Preview

Aristotle's Credibility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Credibility
Overall, I agree with Aristotle when he says that having a good moral character and establishing credibility is an important part of being successful in persuasive speaking. I believe that if someone is passionate and knowledgeable about the topic they are discussing they would be able to establish credibility with their audience. I also agree when Aristotle says that credibility needs to be earned during the speech. However, it would be challenging for a speaker who in the past has been known to not be a credible source for information to change the views of an audience who already has bad judgement of him or her. In vice versa a speaker who has been credible in the past would not have as hard of a time convincing an audience of his credibility.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Persuasion is achieved by the speaker’s personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: This is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is possible and opinions are divided. This kind of persuasion, like the others, should be achieved by what the speaker says, not by what people think of this character before he begins to speak. It is not true, as some writers assume in their treatises on rhetoric, that the personal goodness revealed by the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Quintilian Rhetoric

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Roman rhetorician Quintilian once commented, “And what, after all, is an orator? Not a good speaker, but a good person speaking well..." Great speeches influence, challenge or persuade audiences from any context because they are messages ‘good' people have imparted upon human society to urge moral and social progress. Some orators such as Socrates focus on logical argument, whilst others such as Lincoln and Levertov use the emotional powers of their rhetoric. However, they all expound universally appreciated…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rhetorician might not be truthful with his audience. He might fool the masses to believe something not morally just. He also speaks rhetorically not for the good of doing good, but because it pleasures his listeners which, in turn, benefits him. “In order to use rhetoric for good, rhetoric cannot exist alone; it must depend on philosophy to guide its morality. Socrates, therefore, believes that morality is not inherent in rhetoric and that without philosophy, rhetoric is simply used to persuade for personal gain.”1 If you want to convey a matter of any subject and persuade all those hearing, I believe you should be an authority on the subject and also have the intention of enlightening your audience. By doing this, you are doing something that can be considered virtuous. By this I mean that it is being done for the sake of perhaps actually educating an audience, of passing valid information and not for seeking the pleasure of impairing the beliefs of any person. You should be imparting nothing less than the…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Note: The process of the Scientific Method is outlined well in the lecture found at Classroom>Canyon Connect>Module 1 Readings>. You can also find the process of the Scientific Method in Chapter 1 of your textbook as well as at the References listed at the end of this document.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle is one of the most well known philosophers in history. He was born in 384 BC in Stagira, which is in Macedonia. His father was personal physician to the king of Macedonia at that time, Amyntas. He lived until 322 BC when he died at a family estate in Euboea. Aristotle is credited with many great accomplishments during his time. He was pupil to a great mind, as well as a teacher to great leaders. Aristotle's thinking was beyond his time and rivaled the worldview at the time.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” This just one of Aristotle’s famous quotes and is probably the most important of them all. Excellence isn’t an act it’s just a habit something you just do without thinking about the thing you’re excellent at. In the Leaving a Legacy unit, many social and historical movements, as well as people and legacies, have been explored. Some of these people are still going on or have left a legacy worth learning about, one of which is Aristotle. Aristotle is a Greek philosopher who is the icon of western philosophy who started out as a student of Plato to one of the most iconic philosophers ever.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to his point of view, rhetoric is defined as the ability to see what is possible persuasive in very given case. Of course, the definition as such may not be able to apply to all circumstances. Rather, he is in the situation which is similar to physician. He would not be able to convince everyone if he finds out the available means of convincing. Aristotle joins Plato in criticizing contemporary manuals of rhetoric. In Aristotle’s view, people are most strongly convinced when they suppose that something has been proven, there is no need for the orator to confuse or distract the audience by the use of emotional appeals and so on. There is no unbridgeable gap between the commonly-held opinions and what is true. The core of Aristotle's Rhetoric is the doctrine that there are three technical means of…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people would rather die, before they would speak to a group of people in a public forum. With a little practice, public speaking will come easier, and soon, the fear will be overcome. There are some things that a speaker can do to help make the presentation a memorable experience for the audience. This paper will discuss how to develop persuasive communication skills using effective language and techniques to help deliver the message. Becoming the subject matter expert, and knowing what the audience wants to hear, will assist in communicating effectively with them.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credibility is the most important part of the group’s discussion last week. The members of the team agreed that credible sources must have a backup make a valid argument otherwise an argument or claims could become an opinion or an invalid argument. One disadvantage of not having credible information is it could tarnish one’s reputation and mistrust from audiences. Once the information has been put out to the public, the receiver or audience could verify the information to ensure that it comes from credible and reliable information. The speaker builds trust among the audiences when a claim or an argument presented are credible information and comes from a trustworthy source.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When delivering a speech it is important to establish credibility with your audience so they know to believe everything you are telling them. Ethos is known as the perceptions of character, intelligence, and good will that belong to the listening audience. If the audience does not perceive much ethos from a speaker, than there is no established credibility. This leads to a narrow understanding of what you have said. When the audience thinks you do not know what you are talking about, they do not pay attention. Who wants to use there time and research on a group of people who are not listening to you? I try to establish credibility with my audience using the ethical factors learned from our book. Trustworthiness, competence, objectivity,…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Establishing a credible character is especially important when it comes to character. It would be impossible to persuade a colleague or customer if one's credibility was damaged from a previous experience. One way to partially restore that credibility would be to apologize for any mistakes that have been made. Again, credibility is a necessity when it comes to persuasion messages. The ultimate goal of a persuasion message is to influence a person to believe in the same idea as you. Weak credibility typically means that you are untrustworthy which would affect your ability to change a person's perception. Additionally, it is important to strongly development your idea before sharing the message. A speaker is more likely to persuade an audience…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Messages from expert sources are persuasive when the message includes strong arguments from within that expert's field of knowledge. Messages that come from an expert source but are weak are less persuasive than messages coming from someone who is less of an expert, but who has strong arguments (Feenstra, 2011). If we can relate to the message and the message giver, due to the credibility and benefit from both, one can be persuaded easily.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credibility In Speech

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nowadays, in most speech, there many steps to follow, but credibility is like the heart without it you won’t gain the audience attention. In the speech process, we follow many steps from the introduction, the way we caught the attention of the audience, to the credibility on what we said.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle was a pupil of the famous philosopher Plato. During his lifetime (384-322 BC) he learned and taught Socratic philosophy which was taught to him. He was taught this philosophy by Plato, who is responsible for all of Socrates written works since Socrates himself did not write down his teachings. During his teen years he was enrolled in Plato's “Academy” where he then taught for about 20 years after his graduation. After this he started his own school called the “Lyceum”. Here he taught of philosophy and politics. His political teaching broke down regimes into six categories. These categories are then broken down into three groups of pairs. Each of these pairs has one “good” form and one “bad” form. The first tier consists of Monarchy and Tyranny. Each of these is “the rule of the one”, but according to Aristotle, a Monarchy was better than Tyranny because a Monarch puts the needs of his people before his own. The second tier is Oligarchy and Aristocracy. Both of these are “the rule of the few” but Oligarchy was considered a better form because the Oligarchy was not necessarily influenced by money and class whereas Aristocracy was. The third tier was Polity and Democracy. Both of these were “the rule of the many” but Democracy was considered better for the same reasons that Oligarchy was better than Aristocracy. With his teachings of philosophy, and his image of an ideal regime which could possibly be attainable (unlike his predecessor Plato' “ideal city”) he was a very influential character in the future of society. Due to his father being a court physician for King Amyntas of Macedonia, Aristotle was a childhood friend of the later King Phillip. His friendship with King Phillip was the main reason he was asked to teach Phillip's son Alexander (later known as Alexander the Great). Aristotle played a pivotal role in the development of Alexander the Great and it is quite possible that he would…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays