Preview

Courtroom Work Groups

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
384 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Work Groups
| Courtroom Work Groups | Jaraka Ward | | University of Phoenix | 10/21/2012 |

|

I found several responses to the question of who is included in the courtroom work group. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each individual group but also to make sure it is given in a timely manner. The courtroom work group needs to communicate in order to offer plea bargains and choose jurors. The role of the prosecutor is to protect the government or community’s best interests. This being said the prosecutor must take cases based on the facts of each case and the evidence provided. If the prosecutor did not do this and took every case under less stringent requirements it could leave many cases going to trial with a lack of evidence and lead to a waste of court room time and money for attempting a trial with no evidence to convince a jury. This could also lead to innocent people being convicted on no evidence simply because of a well-spoken lawyer. This being said, if the prosecutors were more stringent about the cases they took and the minimum amount of evidence was greater it may lead to criminals getting away with more crimes and never being brought to trial because of a lack of concrete evidence. The only way I see that the courtroom work group could be improved would be if all parties focused more on the justice and rules side rather than always focusing on the speedy aspect of getting things done. There will always be the criminals let go because of a lack of evidence to convince a jury as well as innocent people who will be convicted without proper concrete evidence, this is why I am a strong believer in the appeal system. I do however feel that these numbers could be reduced if we could slow the system down while still maintaining due process and a speedy trial.



References: Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger (2012, 08). Courtroom Workgroups. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 08, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Courtroom-Workgroups-1070144.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |matters; they don't work with civil cases such as |citizens. This makes the prosecutor's duties somewhat |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The courtroom work group is all of the professionals that participate in a court proceeding. They include the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders and any other individuals who earn a living by giving service to the court. These individuals act together with a common goal of bringing any and all court room proceedings to a successful close. Each of professional in the courtroom work group has it's own duties.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The prosecutor has a very important role as a member of the courtroom workgroup. The prosecutor may also be known as the district attorney, states attorney, or the commonwealth attorney (Schmalleger, 2011). The prosecutor is responsible for making and presenting the case of the state against the accused. In their own way the prosecutor speaks on behalf of the people, for the law or laws broken by the defendant. The…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Efficient courtroom workgroups seek to process cases rather than dispense justice. Because the courtroom workgroup deviates from the public idea of how justice works, it has developed a irregular set of virtues to continue its work and ease daily life for its participants. The academic theory of the courtroom workgroup has four cornerstone concepts that recognize this fact: Speed, Pragmatic Cynicism,…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    trail of ghenus khan

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this simulation, I liked that we all worked together as a group, and we each had an important part in the trial. When we work as a group, the work seemed to go faster. For instance, my partner and I were both defensive attorney’s, and when it came to looking for questions…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In United States Criminal Justice System, all criminal cases need the Participation of the judge, counsel for the prosecution, and the counsel for the accused. Criminal justice system is incomplete with either of them not being present. Prosecutors value their power to seek justice for an accused person but sometimes they use it dishonestly. Prosecutors have so much power that they sometimes take advantage of and engage in misconduct.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger. Published by Prentice Hall.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plea bargaining process is very important to the criminal justice system because without it the criminal justice system would grind to a halt. Plea-bargaining is important because if every case went to a trial it would take years for criminals to get from the time of arrest till the time of trial. The video we saw showed an example of how the process works to get criminals who plea guilty to committing minor crimes through the system faster so that the courts can concentrate on those criminals who commit major crimes. In this video you can see some of the variables that enter into the plea-bargaining system and how they can be fair and unfair to the parties involved. You can see the quality of legal representation…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courtroom workgroup is made up of people in the criminal justice system such as judges and prosecutors. They decide what happens in every case that is presented in the system and use their discretion on whether to deny or accept a case. The way that cases are identified as serious depends on the evidence that is available. Other factors such as witnesses, prior record, and criminal activity is all taken into account. If the courtroom workgroup decides that there isn’t enough information for the case to go on they drop it because they see no use in wasting their time with it. Walker mentions that most of the cases like rape are what get dropped because of insufficient evidence and people tend to see it as the offender getting off the hook (2015, p. 66). It may be seen as an injustice because those cases don’t go through to have a trial, but too much work is put into cases that the best option is to just put all the effort in the ones that will get a conviction. Those other cases that are seen as more serious because of prior record and the type of crime committed usually have a high going rate. Some crimes like murder are known to have higher going rate because of how…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The courtroom workgroup is a mechanism for prosecutorial discretion. Various techniques are used to convince the defendant that the evidence against him or her is overwhelming. “Charge stacking” is a process by which police and prosecutors create case with numerous charges or numerous instances of the same charge to convince the defendant that the risk of not pleading guilty is intolerable. The defendant may be convinced to plead guilty to a few of the charges in return for not being prosecuted for the remaining charges. Because the courtroom workgroup deviates from the public consensus of how justice works, it has developed a deviant set of virtues to continue its work and facilitate daily life for its participants. ("Courtroom Workgroup", n.d.) This group interacts daily to make sure that rules are being followed in each individual group but also to make sure it is given in a timely manner. The courtroom work group needs to communicate in order to offer plea bargains and choose jurors. The role of the prosecutor is to protect the government or community’s best interests. With that being said, the prosecutor must take cases based on the facts of each case and the evidence provided. If the prosecutor did not do this and took every case under less stringent requirements it could leave many cases going to trial with a…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judicial branch is responsible for overseeing the local, state, and federal court systems. It explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. Now the Supreme Court is ahead of the judicial branch because it is the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court rules if whether or not the issue itself is constitutional. (Dictionary, 2013)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Court Workgroup

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The courtroom workgroup of juvenile court is very similarly composed as one of adult’s court (Neubauer and Fradella, 2014). Inside the juvenile court you can find the prosecutor, the defense attorney and the judge and sometimes judges have the hearing officers as aid (Neubauer and Fradella, 2014). We can see much equality between the courts however the tasks between the adult courts and the juvenile courts are handled differently. As an example the juvenile court members such as the lawyers and judges use the expert advice of professional that are non-lawyers to help assess the family historical background as well as the youth that is being examined in the court (Neubauer and Fradella, 2014). Juvenile courts use professionals such as social workers, psychologist, and counselors since they mostly deal with young adolescents who require such specialist to help them assess their problems and advice on a proper treatment plan rather than simply dropping them to jail with other criminals who would most likely bring the worst of themselves. Each of these individuals has a special and specific task inside the juvenile court all-important and relevant to make the case.…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since their creation in the 1990’s, problem-solving courts have become of much interest to the legal community. Not only are these courts revolutionary in their way of processing cases, but also they are proving to have great success rates. One of the most important aspects of the problem-solving courts is how much more involved a judge is with each case. In traditional courts, a judge will most likely read off the names of the people in the docket, and simply sentence an individual according to what the DA has already negotiated. During a problem-solving court, the judge has the opportunity to get to know each defendant on a more personal level, and be able to help the defendant succeed. While results have shown that the more involved judges are, the more likely it is for a program to succeed, there is much criticism regarding the judge’s attachment to each…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What if you Were Boss

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the first changes to a more successful process would be the pre-trial release. Understanding that all accused may have the opportunity for bail if provided, in some cases it is not provided. Therefore, if bail is not provided or released, they wait for the results of the case in jail. In my opinion, if the accused makes bail or is released, law officials should track every move they make, so if the accused tries to make a run for it or disappear there would be a way to track them down for their trial or court date. Also, bringing them back into custody a day or two before there court date, so they’re fully accounted for and there is no delay on the trial, would be a good change.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays