Preview

Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution Charles Beard Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
184 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution Charles Beard Analysis
Charles Beard was a historian and political scientist who wrote the book “An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution.” Beard argued that “to understand the Constitution we must understand the economic interests of the national elite, which included the writers of the Constitution.” (144). In this essay, I will discuss Charles Beard and his assertion about the Founding Fathers and the Constitution. “Beard was not saying that the founders wrote the Constitution exclusively for their own benefit but so that they personally benefited immediately from its adoption and that they did not act only under the guidance of abstract principles of political science.” (144). The founders were looking for some type of personal gain in writing the Constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s suggested that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framer’s wealth. Beard believed that the reason why the rich framers wanted to protect against majority rule was to prevent the majority to overthrow the rich. Beard did manage to fit most of the framers under “rich” categories such as lawyers, landowners, and merchants. But, he failed to realize that the framers limited majority rule to protect the rights of minorities, also.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beard V.s. Commager

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    i. Beard supports his thesis by giving evidence of the economic interests of elite who wrote the Constitution, and then showing how the structure of the government benefits these specific interests.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, Framing the Constitution, Charles Beard had a very strong opinion on the Constitution and the motives of the framers. He believed that this document was written by the rich landowners, creditors, merchants, public bondholders, and lawyers, whose motives were to protect their wealth and property. Beard said that the reason the framers were against having majority rule was because they didn't want the majority to "overthrow" the rich framers of the time. This critical and different opinion of the Constitution and its framers is contrary to most modern belief. The framers had the "best minds" and mainly advocated the idea of "self-government". The idea of federalism in a republic was an innovative system.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sup dowg

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States," is a 1913 book by American historian Charles A. Beard. It argues that the structure of the Constitution of the United States was motivated primarily by the economic interests of the Founding Fathers. Beard pointed out, for example, that George Washington was the wealthiest landowner in the country, and had provided significant funding towards the American Revolutionary War. Beard traces the Constitutional guarantee that the newly formed nation would pay its debts to Washington's desire to have his costs refunded.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Roche presents in his essay, the talent apparent in the constitutionalist that met in Philadelphia was superior amongst other groups, which Roche concludes as an advantage. The fundamental need for an ardent group has been a key component of the formation of the United States, acting as the composers of the prosperous future. Roche may consider this formation an advantage due to the authenticity presented, as their reluctance to divert “original” ambitions to pursue an unpremeditated approach of government (Roche 15). The ascendancy they asserted was within reason as the conditions under the Articles and in 1787 presented the need for a convention, likewise promoting the ratification of the Constitution. Of the defects presented in the time…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting on May 25th of 1787 and lasting until September 17th of 1787 the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution is an integral part of American history. Moreover, the study of American history tends to neglect mentioning the “behind the scenes” that progressed the creation of America’s federated Constitutional Republic. “Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution” by Richard Beeman is designed to demonstrate the diversity amongst Founding Fathers’ beliefs, intentions, and contributions to the Constitution and government. The narrative styled historical nonfiction follows the Constitutional Conventions of the late 1700’s including detailed debates surrounding slavery, representation, treasury, and ultimately…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Davis, Sue (2008). Corwin and Peltason’s understanding the Constitution (17th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth Publishing.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard thought that the constitution was just a document written by the rich, whose only motive was protecting their wealth and property. Beard said that these rich men included landholders, creditors, merchants, public bondholders, and wealthy lawyers. He was able to show that many of the men at the Constitutional Conventions fell into one of those categories. He said that the reason the framers wanted to protect against majority rule, was so the majority could not overthrow the few rich men and take over. He then compared this to a small group of creditors protecting themselves against the masses that owed them money. This is also why the constitution had clauses limiting the states control over money lending and circulation. The framers left these powers with the Federal Government, of which they were supposedly in control of. Beard felt these elite men were conspiring to take even more power from the common man to better themselves.…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These historians do not believe Charles Beard's thesis and try to disprove his thoughts and prove that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are people having public security holdings, who are people from all different backgrounds. The Delegates mostly signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looking out for them. There was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to benefit the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the New York State Ratifying Convention shows that there was a mixes of people with different economic status voting for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to want…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard Vs Commager Analysis

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My position on the Beard V Commager debate is on Beard’s side. He believed that the Constitution was an economic document that was set up by the founding fathers so that the government could achieve economic results that benefit their personal interests. On the other hand Commager believed the Constitution is essentially a political document, carefully created to stand for years to come and to serve as an example of democracy for people around the world. In the text Beard supports his thesis by giving evidence of the economic interests of elite who wrote the Constitution, and then showing how the structure of the government benefits these specific interests. Commager supports his thesis by naming the two problems that the Constitution worked…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fed Papers

    • 197900 Words
    • 792 Pages

    The Federalist Papers is a publication of the Pennsylvania State University. This Portable Document file is furnished free and without any charge of any kind. Any person using this document file, for any purpose, and in any way does so at his or her own risk. Neither the Pennsylvania State University nor Jim Manis, Faculty Editor, nor anyone associated with the Pennsylvania State University assumes any responsibility for the material contained within the document or for the file as an electronic transmission, in any way. The Federalist Papers, the Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classics Series, Jim Manis, Faculty Editor, Hazleton, PA 18202-1291 is a Portable Document File produced as part of an ongoing student publication project to bring classical works of literature, in English, to free and easy access of those wishing to make use of them. Cover Design: Jim Manis Copyright © 2001 The Pennsylvania State University…

    • 197900 Words
    • 792 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the US constitution is one of the single most important documents that was ever created by any group of people or government in the world. This document created a country often referred to as an “experiment” that has been successful in many ramifications. The US is looked upon from countries around the world for inspiration and for help when necessary. This is remarkable for a country that has such a relatively short existence compared to other countries in Europe and Africa.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Constitution: A Minority Document Charles Beard argues that the Constitution was written by a group of people who had certain specific economic and political interests. Beard states that the Constitution didn’t reflect the interests of the general population. Beards mentions that the framers largest fear was the corruption of a democratic government. Those with out property were usually excluded from voting, and elections often occurred indirectly to limit the power of the uneducated public. The Constitution was intended to get rid of the character of evil. Beard also states that the Convention members knew from their personal economic affairs the precise results which the new government that they were setting up was designed to attain. It also ensures a division of society into different interests and party’s. Beard also writes that Madison makes the underlying political science of constitution in the tenth number. Here he lays down, in no uncertain language, the principle that the first and elemental concern of every government is economic. The first objective of government is the protection of the diversity in the faculties of men from which the rights of property originate. The most common source of factions is the unequal distribution of property. An unequal distribution of property is inevitable, and from its contending factions will rise in the state. To secure the public good the contending classes cannot be eliminated and their interests are bound to be reflected in politics, the only way out lies in making it difficult for enough contending interests to fuse into a…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hofstader Analysis

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The American Political Tradition by Richard Hofstadter, the article, “Founding Fathers: An Age of Reason,” talks about the founding fathers’ views of the American people. From what is printed in textbooks, people give the founding fathers too much esteem, when they really held none for the people. Hofstadter makes the point that the founding fathers had a very negative view of the common American citizen.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Founders and the Central Government." Outside the Beltway. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Jan. 2014. .…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays