Preview

Examine and Comment on the relationship between religion and science with reference to the topic you have studied

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine and Comment on the relationship between religion and science with reference to the topic you have studied
The relationship between religion and science has always been complicated, with many scholars having very separate ideas. There are three ways to look at this relationship; Some scholars and religious groups, such as ultra Darwinist Richard Dawkins and literalist Christians believe in what has come to be known as the conflict model, when one believes that one dominates the other. The convergence model argues that science and religion work together harmoniously, the distinct model argues that science and religion shouldn't be mixed.
The way the people view the relationship between religion and science has been affected by many events over the years. One of the best examples of this is the release of Darwin's theory of evolution. The publication of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species (1859) is regarded as a landmark in nineteenth-century science. One popular account of the origin of species that was more readily supported by religious believers held that God had somehow created the entire world exactly as we now see it, this theory was heaving influenced by William Paley. This was not, however the biggest rival to Darwin's theory of evolution, the idea of the "fixity of species" was argued by Linnaeus, and said that the present range of species which can be observed in the natural world represents the way they were in the beginning and the way they will always be. It was Linnaeus' detailed classification of every species that 'proved' to many of his readers that nature was fixed from the moment of its origination. This fitted in well with the popular and literal reading of genesis. Similarly, Nicolaus Copernicus' Heliocentric model of the solar system published just before his death in 1543 argues that the sun was the centre of the solar system and that the earth and various other planets all revolved around it. At the time, this proved to be highly controversial, as there was still a continuing belief in the Ptolemaic model. The Ptolemaic model was, like the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Scientific Revolution was a progressive movement that that place in the 16th and 17th century. Scientist and Philosophers would have to reexamine traditionally held values. Nowhere is this best exemplified as is in the reshaping of the European view of the universe. Since the Middle Ages the Catholic Church had followed the Ptolemaic model of the universe, a geocentralized solar system where the Earth is orbited by the various planets in regular, crystalline spheres. The Polish astronomer Nicholas Copernicus, however, presented a system where the sun was the center of the solar system, thereby solving numerous mathematical problems encountered at the time. German astronomer Johannes Kepler further championed Copernicanism by discovering that the path of the planets' orbits is elliptical rather than circular, as was previously thought. English physicist Sir Isaac Newton would later justify this theory by establishing his laws of gravity.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacks Great Partnership

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’ The Great Partnership: Science, Religion and the Search for Meaning depicts Sacks’ understanding of the relationship between religion and science. In the first part of the book, Sacks’ differentiates between religion and science and discusses some of the reasons why people believe that science and religion are incompatible. The second part of Sacks’ book is primarily about the importance of religion and the effect on the world if religion was lost. The last and final part of his book goes over some of the major challenges that science and people pose to faith. The main thesis of Sacks’ book is that science and religion are two ways of thinking that are necessary and compatible with one another. According to Sacks’ science…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GP_Science_and_religion

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Extension Lecture 3: Science and Religion 21 April & 25 April 2014 “Science without Religion is lame; Religion without Science is blind” – Albert Einstein ‘God is the Ultimate Scientist’ – Anonymous Lecture Outline 1. What is science? 2. What is religion? 3.…

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Entwistle

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “In many ways the foundations of science were paved in part by Christian worldview that allowed for the universe to be seen as an orderly place in which laws could describe the regularities found within it, based on the premise that the world was created by a powerful, rational and person Being” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 33).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The changes and developments of scientific thought from Copernicus to Newton created a new conception of the universe as well as humanities place within it. The constant change of scientific ideas made by Copernicus, Brahe, Kepler, Galileo and Newton created the new conception of the universe. In the 1500s, the traditional European ideas about the universe were based on Aristotle’s ideas, which said a motionless Earth was at the center of the universe and ten separate transparent crystal spheres moved around it. Heaven was beyond these spheres. The reason this was accepted was because it not only gave an explanation for what was actually seen by the eye but also established a home for Christians as well as for God. With this theory, which was accepted by the church, humans were at the center of the universe and were an important link in a “great chain of being.” At this time, science truly reinforced religious thought and these…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first major figure whose scientific views conflicted with the official position of the church was Nicolaus Copernicus, who published an anonymous work claiming that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system. (The traditional, earth-centered view was associated with a second-century Egyptian natural philosopher named Ptolemy.) Copernicus died (1543) before his work was widely enough known, or widely enough associated with him, to cause him personal problems. However, his book On the Revolution of the Celestial Spheres was added to the Index of Forbidden Books maintained by the Roman Catholic Church, and Christians were forbidden to read it.…

    • 14026 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Towne Summary

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Towne’s explains that religion and science are coming more together, the more that people try to separate them. Also, that we should not try to stand in the way of something that is inevitable such as this. When trying to understand why people see them as being so different, they eventually prove that they are quite similar. He went on to say if we can look at the nature of them, then they are “almost indistinguishable” (Townes, 1966). Some people see them as different because of how they thought of them. People see science as more of an experiment…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Overemphasis on one philosophy has often led to a strong reaction by another philosophy. In our time of emphasizing science, we see a resurgence of religious fundamentalism in many parts of the world. This may be explained by a closing-of-the-ranks of those who feel seriously threatened in their security by the loss of the foundation of their faith and culture or gain merit by fighting for their faith – and also explained by the defense of hierarchies hanging on to their power.…

    • 2841 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Galileo Was Condemned

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Primarily, during the seventeenth century, there were two theories looking to explain the nature of the solar system. The geocentric theory, which proposed that the earth was at the centre of the universe and that the sun orbits it and the heliocentric theory, which correctly placed the sun at the centre of the solar system with the earth as part of its orbit, the theory also explained that day and night were caused by the earth’s rotation, this position was adopted by Galileo and published in 1613 in ‘Historia e dimonstrazioni intorno alle macchie solari’ (e notes: Galileo ). The geocentric theory, the accepted theory of the time, can be argued to have been religiously motivated, although there is certainly some debate surrounding this; many commentators dispel this notion. However, it is no secret that the church certainly followed this theory and that it was indeed the accepted ‘science’ of the day. At the same time it is important to note that Galileo was not the discoverer of the heliocentric theory; it was in fact named after Nicholas Copernicus who published it in his book some two decades before.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the years we have seen the evolution of science and how it was grown to be what is considered science today. In all that growth, there have always been controversial aspects of science, which are still disputed today. One large controversy that still stands today is the theory of evolution is the idea of religion and the story of creation. These two concepts can be either seen as two opposing sides or two separate entities that have nothing to do with the other. Either way, the theory of evolution and religion have yet to see eye to eye. With every controversy there will be people standing on both ends of the spectrum. On the side of evolution with no belief in religion or God is Richard Dawkins. On the other end of the spectrum are people who take the literal interpretation of the bible. There are also some people who believe in a combination of religion and evolution, Stephen Gould. Over the years, people gave gained popularity for their ideas within the field of science and religion.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European History Essay

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The scientific revolution is a time period in history roughly from 1500 to 1700 that is known as one where advances in European mathematical, political and scientific thought occurred. A “founding father” of the scientific revolution was a polish scientist by the name of Nicholas Copernicus, whose conclusion that it was the sun, not the earth that lies at the center of the solar system, was a direct contradiction to the church, which strongly believed the vice-versa or the Geo-Centric theory. (Merriman,290) It was this initiating step that led other scientists to further question and test traditional church beliefs. An example of this is Galileo Galilee and his creation of a telescope that would confirm the geocentric theory, although for which he was decreed a heretic and put under house arrest. (Merriman 296)…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    .Nicolaus Copernicus wrote “On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres” which challenged the theory that earth was the center of the universe, that the sun was the center. This challenged Religion by challenging the Bible’s Book of Genesis.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays