Factors of Bullying
Bullying: The identify technique and its major risk factors
Dr. Kasetchai Laeheem1, Dr. Metta Kuning2, Dr. Nittaya McNeil2 1. Department of Educational Foundation, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University 2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University.
Abstract The purpose of this study was to study the technique for identifying bullying outcomes, and to investigate the risk factors associated with bullying behaviour at Pattani primary schools, southern Thailand. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,440 students. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and logistic regression were used for data analysis. In this study, factor analysis and standardized score techniques were used to identify bullying outcome. It was found that 301 (20.9%) students could be identified as a bully. Witnessing parental physical abuse and preference for action cartoons were major risk factor for bullying others. Students having parental physical abuse experiences were more likely to bully others than were those who had never witnessed parental physical abuse (odds ratio 7.11, 95% confidence intervals 5.26-9.60). Students who preferred action cartoons tended to bully more than did students who preferred comedy cartoons (odds ratio 2.96, 95% confidence intervals 1.99-4.43).
Key words: bullying, cartoon, factor analysis, parental physical abuse, risk factors
The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs – Literature – Lifestyle_002
1
1. Background and significance of problem Bullying behaviour in primary schools is well-known to students, parents, teachers and educational personnel. School bullying is a serious problem which affects students’ quality of life, inflicting psychological, emotional, and physical damage and occurs throughout the world. School bullying can be
Dr. Kasetchai Laeheem1, Dr. Metta Kuning2, Dr. Nittaya McNeil2 1. Department of Educational Foundation, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University 2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University.
Abstract The purpose of this study was to study the technique for identifying bullying outcomes, and to investigate the risk factors associated with bullying behaviour at Pattani primary schools, southern Thailand. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,440 students. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and logistic regression were used for data analysis. In this study, factor analysis and standardized score techniques were used to identify bullying outcome. It was found that 301 (20.9%) students could be identified as a bully. Witnessing parental physical abuse and preference for action cartoons were major risk factor for bullying others. Students having parental physical abuse experiences were more likely to bully others than were those who had never witnessed parental physical abuse (odds ratio 7.11, 95% confidence intervals 5.26-9.60). Students who preferred action cartoons tended to bully more than did students who preferred comedy cartoons (odds ratio 2.96, 95% confidence intervals 1.99-4.43).
Key words: bullying, cartoon, factor analysis, parental physical abuse, risk factors
The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs – Literature – Lifestyle_002
1
1. Background and significance of problem Bullying behaviour in primary schools is well-known to students, parents, teachers and educational personnel. School bullying is a serious problem which affects students’ quality of life, inflicting psychological, emotional, and physical damage and occurs throughout the world. School bullying can be
References: Baldry, A. C. 2003. Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 713–732. Beale, A. 2001. “Bully busters”: Using drama to empower students to take a stand against bullying behaviour. Professional School Counseling, 4, 300-306. Beran, T. 2005. A new perspective on managing school bullying: Pre-service teachers’ attitudes. Journal of Social Science, 8: 43-49. Besag, V. E. 2006. Understanding girls’ friendships, fights and feuds: A practical approach to girls’ bullying. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Blumberg, F.C., Bierwirth, K.P. 2008. Schwartz AJ. Does Cartoon Violence Beget Aggressive Behavior in Real Life? An Opposing View. Early Childhood Educ J. 2008; 36:101–104. Carlyle, K. E., and Steinman, K. J. 2007. Demographic differences in the prevalence, cooccurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. Journal of School Health, 77: 623-629. Cooke, P. 1993. TV causes violence? Says Who?. The New York Times. Craig, W. 1998. The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety and aggression in elementary children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130. Egbochuku, E. O. 2007. Bullying in Nigerian schools: Prevalence study and implications for counselling, J. Soc. Sci., 14(1): 65-71. Farrington, D.P. 1993. Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice (Vol. 17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gini, G. 2008. Associations between bullying behaviour, psychosomatic complaints, emotional and behavioural problems. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 44: 492– 497. Hawkins, D. L., Pepler D. J., and Craig, W. M. 2001. Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10 (4): 512-527. Herrera, V. M., and McCloskey, L. A. 2001. Gender differences in the risk for delinquency among youth exposed to family violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25: 1037–1051. Junger, T. J. 1996. Youth and violence in Europe. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5(1): 31-58. The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs – Literature – Lifestyle_002 12 Kirsch, S. 2006. Cartoon violence and aggression in youth. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 11: 547–557. Larson, M.S. 2003. Gender, Race, and Aggression in Television Commercials That Feature Children. Sex Roles. 48: 67-75. McNeil, D. 1996. Epidemiological research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Mouttapa, M., Valente, T., Gallaher, P., Rohrbach, L. A., and Unger, J. B. 2004. Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Adolescence, 39: 315-336. Olweus, D. 1999. The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London: Routledge. Parada, R. H., Marsh, H. W., and Craven, R. G. 2005. There and back again from bully to victim and victim to bully: A reciprocal effects model of bullying behaviours in schools. Sydney, Australia: SELF Research Centre, University of Western Sydney. Scholte, R. J., Engels, R. E., Overbeek, G., Kemp, R. T., and Haselager, G. T. 2007. Stability in Bullying and Victimization and its Association. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35: 217-228. Tapanya, S. 2006. A survey of bullying problem of students in Thailand. Chiang-Mai: Faculty of Medicine, Chiang-Mai University. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., and Ormel, J. 2005. Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41: 672-682. Wan Salwina, W. I., Susan, M. K., Nik Ruzyanei, N. J., Tuti Iryani, M. D., Syamsul, S., Aniza, A., and Zasmani, S. 2009. School bullying amongst standard students attending primary national schools in the federal territory of Kuala Lumpur: The prevalence and associated socio demographic factors, Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry, 18(1): 5-12. Williams, G. 2007. Gabriel Tarde and the Imitation of Deviance. Available at: http://www.criminology.fsu.edu/crimtheory/ tarde.htm. [Accessed date: September 21, 2007]. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., and Schulz, H. 2001. Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology. 92: 673–696. The 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences April 10th, 2010 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Beliefs – Literature – Lifestyle_002 13