Preview

Hobbes vs Locke

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
551 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes vs Locke
Hobbes vs. Locke
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were known as Social Contract Theorists, and Natural Law Theorists. The two men both had very strong views on freedom and how a country should be governed. Thomas Hobbes had more of a Pessimistic view while John locke had more of an Optimistic view. Hobbes and Locke believed in a type of Social Contract between the Government and being governed. Hobbes believed in Absolute Monarchs and Locke believed in the will of people being governed. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic appraisal of human nature. They both had extremely different views on government, but the bases of their arguments were similar. They both used reason to justify their ideas, rather than divine right. Although both men acknowledged that there was a God, He played a very small role in their ideologies. I believe that both Hobbes and Locke are genuinely correct.
Thomas Hobbes believed mankind good and evil depended on what the individual loved and hated. He believed that life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." (119) Mankind was naturally equal in power of mind and body so no individual was capable of dominating another. In a strictly natural condition there was no justice or injustice because everyone had their right to seek and take whatever is good and dispose of whatever was bad for them. He was for absolute monarchy. Thomas Hobbes believed that “authoritarian governments were necessary to keep human beings’ worst impulses under control.”(119) He did not believe that a large group of men would agree with one and other and peacefully run a country. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic view of human nature. The passages in Hobbes writings show that he did not desire the possibility of anything like modern totalitarianism. For Hobbes, any division of power was an invitation to chaos.
Locke believed all men should be free but should some freedom be sacrificed in



Cited: Hobbes, Thomas. “from Leviathan. “ Reading The World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd Ed. Ed. Austin Michael. New York: Norton, 2010.119.Print. Hobbes, Thomas. “from Leviathan.” Reading the World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd Ed. Ed. Austin Michael. New York: Norton, 2010.125.Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Gauthier, D. (1969) The Logic of ‘Leviathan’: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies: Hobbes vs. Locke In the novel, Lord of The Flies by William Golding, several young boys are stranded on an island and must maintain civilization on their own with no real authority. Their attempt at maintaining a peaceful and civilized state between each other can help to explain the theories of philosophy stated by Jack Hobbes and John Locke. In Locke’s philosophy, he states that people are naturally good. He believes that is in our nature, as humans, to be good people and do what it is that we know is right and what we are told is right.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were very different Enlightenment philosophers.They had many similarities and differences on what form of government they should form for the people.For example Thomas Hobbes believed in a powerful government,and John Locke believed in a limited government where the government should protect the people’s natural rights. Both of these philosophers were seventeen century enlightenment thinkers.Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different points of view on how the government should be formed for the people.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on government. Though it is not directly stated in his text, most historians believe Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy. He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil. The sovereign (government) has the obligation of keeping the peace and, when need be, national defense. The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative,…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs. Locke

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Locke, John, and C. B. Macpherson. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 1980. N. pag. Print.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes believes that the government protects us from ourselves. While Locke believes the government protects natural rights. They have different beliefs on why they have the government. Hobbes believes that sovereignty resides to the monarch, or the kings. Locke believes that sovereignty resides to the people or the community. Sovereignty is where the power is holded. Hobbes believes that the government’s…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    That difference in opinion is just one out of a whole list of their views on the government. There once was a legend of a great sea monster called the leviathan. In Thomas Hobbes’s eyes that was a major opportunity. He said that a great government can result from having awesome power over the leviathan and can be a new punishment for the people. So in Hobbes’s mind control over the leviathan equaled total power and the best government. John Locke on the other hand had another idea at hand. He thought that it would be best to jus leave the people alone in their mistakes. He thought that if someone makes a mistake that instead of being tried and killed for their actions, people should be able to learn from their experience and improve.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The battle between Hobbes and Locke still continues today through their influence on governments and how they believed government should work. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarch where they were to demand obedience in order to maintain order. On the other hand, John Locke thought that a Democracy was a better form of government provided that they had the right information to make. This form of government allows the people to keep their natural rights rather than giving them up in exchange for protection by the monarch. As a result of their views on human nature and what form government should take, it is easy to see why Lockean government is more powerful than Hobbesian by looking at past governments in history as well as logically.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke believed that everyone was born naturally good and had three basic rights, the rights to life, liberty, and property. Thomas Hobbes however, believed everyone was born naturally evil and needed to be controlled and punished. This greatly affected both of their views on government. Thomas Hobbes, since he thought people were evil and should be stripped of free will, believed in absolute monarchy and that people were incapable of making decisions for themselves, whereas John Locke, believing people were naturally good and capable of making decisions for themselves, believed that it is vital that the government was ruled…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    hobbes and kant

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes was a different kind of philosopher that had a very pessimistic view on humanity. In Hobbes’ book the Leviathan, he believed that humans were naturally nasty creatures and needed to be regulated in a society. For Hobbes one thing he also believed in was Utilitarianism, which is the desire for pleasure that drives our actions, basically, the most useful choice for your benefit. Hobbes had a theory that was called “the state of nature”, which in the eyes of Hobbes was life for humans before any kind of laws or governments. He says that the state of nature is a violent place with no lows. In the state of nature there is no business, no account of time, buildings, and there is always danger around the corner. For Hobbes the “state of nature” was a savage place that could only be fixed by laws, there is only peace when there is no war and no war is a place with laws. Hobbes came to the conclusion that humans cant live in groups without law. Hobbes was…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What were the similarities and differences between philosophers Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau? Rousseau was more of an optimistic philosopher in government, who believed that humans live independent lives in the state of nature, happiness, goodness, and freedom. And Locke believed that the governmental power had to be limited, but like Rousseau, Locke emphasized that people had natural rights. Hobbes however believed that peace and security can only be achieved by establishing government and like the others he also intends to bring a sense of peace to the people but is a strop supporter of powerful government.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are both undoubtedly two of the most well known and written about philosophers of all time. However, their theories and ideas on what society is, and what society should be should be differ drastically making them different as night and day. Thomas Hobbes had a rather dark view of society and the people in it, likely due to the political and civil unrest that he had experienced. This caused him to see humans as inherently hostile and that we are generally incapable of keeping peace with one another. John Locke on the other hand saw humans as inherently good and thought that we would seek peace with one another and prosper through the good intentions of one another. Both sought to make social contract theories on what they felt was the key to a well adjusted smoothly running society.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Hampton, J., ‘Thomas Hobbes’, [in] Classics of Political and Moral Philosophy, Cahn, S. M., (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 2002…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Nature

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “And therefore if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies,” stated Thomas Hobbes, an eminent English philosopher. One of Hobbes’ masterpieces is “The Leviathan” where he records his thoughts about absolutism, and his dissatisfactory view on the nature of man before government. John Locke, another well-known philosopher, opposes Hobbes’ conclusions about human nature. He wrote “Of Civil Government,” here Locke speaks of a state of nature where men are free, independent, and equal. Locke and Hobbes were some of the most influential philosophers who discussed human nature and society; yet, these men had conflicting views over their political philosophies.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays