Preview

How did thinkers from the late antiquity to the renaissance explore the relationship between faith and reason?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How did thinkers from the late antiquity to the renaissance explore the relationship between faith and reason?
How did thinkers from the late antiquity to the renaissance explore the relationship between faith and reason?

The relationship between faith and reason has been explored by a number of thinkers and philosopher’s since ancient times. The exploration undertaken by Renaissance writer; Machiavelli is a particularly significant due to its contrast with thinker of the late antiquity such as Thomas Aquinas, he is particularly interested in classical literature ttys to distil the experiences of Rome and Greece through its rulers. His book ‘The Prince’ and ‘The Discourses’ are books of particular interest which outline his views on reason and faith.
The most famous piece and controversial piece of writing ‘The Prince’ acts is written guide for future princes on how to govern. His firm and well explained opinions regarding church, power and reason is contradictory to late antiquity write Thomas Aquinas who believes faith justifies reason.

Machiavelli’s emerged in the renaissance period; a time during which new ideas where developing in regards to science and technology, he felt that reason and faith should be associated as one. He felt that the faith should have a place within the state acting as a support and encouragement to the success and prosperousness of the state; ‘religion introduced into Rome was one of the chief causes of the prosperity of that city’. He felt faith was essential to ensure successful running of the state. The significance of the church for Machiavelli was that this organisation allowed control this is shown in his text ‘The Discourses’ where he mentions Numa as being the successor of religion and peace, she is described as more important then Romulus who represents soldiery and lawmaker; ‘I believe that the higher merit would be conceded to Numa; for where religion exists it is easier to introduce armies and discipline’ This shows Machiavelli understood that citizens will not obey by mere fear of being punished however will obey through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miles Unger offers an interesting take on Machiavelli in, Machiavelli: A Biography, written in 2011. Right off the bat, Unger’s Machiavelli regards priests as “charlatans and swindlers” Upon his death, a prominent church man described Machiavelli as “an enemy of the human race” with the Pope following suit several years in the future-a move that the anticlerical Machiavelli “might have taken as a backhanded compliment”. Unger argues that because Machiavelli’s works were placed in the Index of Prohibited Books, this give credence to the argument of Machiavellian atheism. Machiavelli’s goal in his writings encourages the hearkening back to the ancient writers such as Aristotle in an effort to bypass Christianity with paganism. Christianity proved too weak in the mind of Machiavelli, therefore something older and more violent needed to be used in order to stave off the corruption and attack on liberty that the Papacy brought. Although an excellent read, Unger offers little…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmation of Faith had largely arisen to counter the rationalistic currents of the Age of…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The corruption of religious faith: how organized religion used propaganda to gain power from the middle ages to the Renaissance…

    • 1804 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early 1500’s, three theological philosophies came to recognize the Reformation: Sola gratia, sola fide, and sola scriptura. Sola gratia (Latin, ‘grace alone’ or ‘by grace alone’) this highlights that salvation occurs by God’s ‘grace alone’. Sola fide (Latin, ‘faith alone’ or ‘by faith alone’) is alike in that it stresses that people accept God’s gracious offer of salvation by (or through) ‘faith alone’. Sola scriptura (Latin, ‘scripture alone’) emphasizes that ‘scripture alone’, rather than church authority or human opinion, represents religious authority. It is sometimes called the ‘formal principle’…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A theologist uses reason to rationalize specific explanations that they consider just with what is being discussed with fellow theologians. Reasons along with faith are theological with religious context, as in theology, where it almost universally refers to a trusting belief in a transcendent reality or a Supreme Being (God); thus this being’s role in the order of transcendence and spiritual things. Theology can be summed up as the study of God and religious beliefs…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think Machiavelli means leaders need to show their followers their human qualities. When using these qualities, leaders get people to believe what they are doing is in the best interest of everyone. Leaders get people on their side and the people do not see they are being manipulated to believe in what leaders want them to believe. But in reality, leaders are manipulating people to do what they want to achieve their objective. Machiavelli believes it is better to be feared than to be loved.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In St. Augustine's book entitled Political Writings, one could see that Christianity plays a very important role in his view of politics. His opinion on the morality or lack of morality in politics, to me makes it more evident that Christianity persuades his views. Although it seems his writings have become quite well known and admired, not everyone fully shared his beliefs. Niccolo Machiavelli, for instance, seemed to believe in a government that was not driven by morality, but more by practicality. In, The Prince, Machiavelli stresses that the moral fibers of government should not be so soft. Like St. Augustine, his work went on to become one of the most famous books ever written about politics. Throughout the two works there are some similarities and differences regarding politics, however it their view of Christianity and morality that many find most intriguing.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Lawrence in his book Culture and Values A Survey of the Humanities, Machiavelli "sees Christianity 's role in politics as a disaster that destroys the power of the state to govern."(302). In other words, the Church interfered deeply in everything, especially in state management. A good example of this is Henry VIII, who ruled England from 1509 to 1547 and remains one of English most famous and controversial king because of his divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Henry VIII wanted to divorce from Catherine that followed by marriage to Anne Boleyn. But, the Church of Rome did not allow him to do what he had wanted for so long, about six years. In 1534, Henry VIII broke with the Church of Rome over his divorce, found his own church and made himself Head of the Church of England. Clearly, Henry VIII who was a king of England, had no ability of divorcing his wife without the Church of Rome 's sanction unless he cut off all the connections from Rome. That is to say that the Church had an immense large religious influence on much of the power of a state to govern, in other words, politics. From Machiavelli 's point of view, "the state needs to restrict the power of the Church, allowing it to exercise is office only in the spiritual realm."(302). I strongly agree with Machiavelli that there are always so much conflicts between the politics and the church that these two powerful influences can not share power and influence.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Machiavelli Satan?

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for writing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici, called the Magnificent, ruler of Florence. The political views Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the theology of the Church, specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Middle Ages was the medieval era between 500-1400 AD. Many literary, artistic, and architectural advances occurred. Many labels could be used to describe the era; for example the Dark Ages, Age of Faith, and Golden Age are common. The Dark Ages suggests that there is ignorance and barbarism. The Age of Faith suggests people are faithful and loyal to God and any churches. Staying devoted to God helped people have hope that better times were ahead after suffering through the Dark Ages. A Golden Age is a time of peace and prosperity. During a Golden Age, lots can be accomplished and the society will thrive. Although the Dark Ages and Age of Faith reflect the era between 500-1400 AD in Europe, the Golden Age is the label that best describes…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays