Preview

How Did Warren Burger Change The Judicial System?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Warren Burger Change The Judicial System?
The former Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger who served from 1969-1986 and was the 15th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Burger was nominated in 1969 by President Richard Nixon to replace former Chief Justice Earl Warren. During his 17 years that he served as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Burger helped make decisions on many Supreme Court cases during the time of the Burger Court. Burger’s work has changed how the judiciary system now works and changed many laws to make the United States a better place.
Warren E. Burger was born on September 17th, 1907 in St. Paul, Minnesota and was the fourth out of seven children. His father was a cargo inspector along with a traveling salesman and his mother took care of the home. While Burger got his education he delivered
…show more content…
During his career as a Chief Justice, Burger focused on the administrative functions of the Supreme Court. He strived to make the judiciary system run as smoothly as it could while also using his opinions and views to change laws to make the Constitution say what he thinks is right. In the Supreme Court case, Roe vs. Wade, Burger used his views on whether women should have the right to legal abortions to make the decision if women being able to have abortions should be protected under the 14th Amendment. Burger’s views and opinions helped to change how America is today by giving women more rights, citizens having more voting rights, giving suspects of crimes more rights and giving people more rights. Some other examples of what Burger was able to do as Chief Justice were giving criminal defendants more rights and for minorities he was able to prevent some of the racism that came from the desegregation of schools. Burger was able to give all types of Americans more rights based on the Supreme Court cases that were seen while the Burger Court was in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 12 Study Guide

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Marshall (September 24, 1755 – July 6, 1835) was an American jurist and statesman who shaped American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court a center of power. Marshall was Chief Justice of the United States, serving from January 31, 1801, until his death in 1835.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brethren Summary

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While Marshal brought the court into its power, and the Warren court fought for civil liberties, Burger established modern technology and brought to light the political nature of the highest court in the land. Warren Burger was selected by a scheming President Nixon who had hoped to appoint a Chief Justice to reverse the liberal change done by Warren; already Burger is in office for political reasons rather than merit and in the interest of the people. Once in office, instead of adjusting to court and the way of being a justice, Burger is deterred to make the court, the law, and the justices adjust to him. He remains stuck in his conniving political games, for example, changing the status quo and voting last to ensure he would be in the majority and assign who writes the opinions. Besides his obvious power complex, that exemplifies how Burger is willing to abandon his morals and beliefs for dominate and a favorable view in the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He went on to become Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, then 8 years later he was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals by Ronald Regan. During Regan’s presidency, Scalia was appointed, and confirmed by the senate to be one of the Associate Justices on the Supreme Court (Reilly, 2016). Antonin Scalia earned his place on the Supreme Court through hard work, and dedication to the Judicial System throughout his career. Scalia’s voice will never be forgotten because he remained to have a strong conservative view throughout his career, and always vocalized his opinions on issues brought forth in the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court, established in 1789, is the highest judicial body and final court of appeal in the United States. Its nine members include one chief justice and eight associate justices who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court is responsible for explaining the U.S. Constitution and making sure that federal and state laws comply with its articles and amendments. It is based in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. In addition to the nine members, there are also court officers to assist the court in its performance. The other members are; Counselor to the Chief Justice, the Clerk, the Librarian, the Marshal, the Reporter of Decisions, the Court Counsel, the Curator, the Director of…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was the Supreme Court in the development of African-American civil rights in the years 1950 to 1962?…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Felix Frankfurter was Supreme Court Judge from January 30, 1939 to August 28, 1962 (about 23 years). He wrote 247 opinions of the court, 132 concurring opinions, and 251 dissents. He was an outspoken advocate that the interpretation of the constitution should not impose sharp limits on both the legislative and executive branches of government. He refused to apply the constitution to the states, but would only focus it as…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kennedy. Thurgood Marshall served there until 1965 when Thurgood Marshall became the United States Solicitor General. As Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall represented the federal government before the Supreme…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the United States Chief Justice, John Marshall changed several governmental standards. These standards include the change in the judicial system and strengthening the central government. “As man whose political doctrines led always…to strengthen government at the expense of the people,” this quote states that Marshall’s goal was only to improve the federal government at the expense of the states. Marshall had served at Valley Forge and had been impressed with the drawbacks of no central authority, thus he became a lifelong Federalist, committed to strengthening the power of the federal government. His theory of putting the central government over the states is a corrupt and damaging idea that will lead to future events, such as Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohens v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden. The power of the federal government should be left in the hands of the states.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnson Kennedy’s successor appointed Marshall to serve as the first black U.S. solicitor general, with two years of being solicitor he won 14 out of the 19 cases he had. In 1967 President Johnson nominated Thurgood to serve on the bench by October he was moved up to be a Supreme Court justice, him becoming the first African American to serve on the nation's highest court. He later joined liberal Supreme Court by Chief Justice Earl Warren, who aligned with Thurgood’s viewing on politics and and Constitution. He consistently supported rulings keeping a strong protection on individual rights and the liberal interpretations of controversial social issues. Part of the majority that ruled in favor of the right to abortion in the 1973 case Roe V. Wade, 1972 case Furman V. Georgia that led to De Facto Moratorium on death penalty, Marshall gave his opinion on it by saying that it was unconstitutional in circumstances. Throughout his 24 years on the court republican presidents appointed eight consecutive justices, he gradually became an isolated liberal member of an increasingly conservative court. For the part time on the bench he largely relegated to issuing strongly worded dissents as the court had reinstated the death penalty, limited affirmative, and abortion…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roe V. Wade Case Study

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Wade case went to court, judicial activism occurred. The question during court was, “Did the Constitution say that a woman has the right to abortion?” Roe’s argument was supported by the 1st, 4th, 9th, and the14th amendment in the Constitution, where she placed new rights of making babies. She interpreted the 1st amendment that abortion laws are based on religious beliefs. She interpreted the 4th amendment that to be secure in their persons. She interpreted the 9th amendment that undefined rights not mentioned in the constitution. And the most important, she interpreted the 14th amendment that no state shall deny life, liberty in the Constitution and got what she wanted in the end. Jane used these amendments to greatly help her out in her case.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays