HR0864
Module Title:
Analysing Organisations
Distributed on:
2014/15
Hand in Date:
Please do not enter a date in this box. Please advise the relevant programme office of the preferred week for hand in.
Further information about general assessment criteria, ARNA regulations, referencing and plagiarism can be found on the module’s site on the e-Learning Portal. Students are advised to read and follow this information.
Instructions on Assessment:
Analysing Organisations
The module assessment consists of a 3000 word essay which analyses a case organisation using one, or a maximum of two of the topics covered in the module, chosen by the student.
Choose an organization with which you are familiar to answer the following question: …show more content…
Reflect on their own ethical values.
Goal Three: Have developed leadership and management capability
1.
Demonstrate their personal contribution to team effectiveness.
X
2.
Communicate complex issues effectively.
3.
Demonstrate decision making and problem solving skills.
4.
Carry out presentations and lead discussions.
Goal Four: Have developed and applied knowledge of international business and management theory
x
1.
Acquire, interpret and apply knowledge of international business, management and organisational functions.
Goal Five: Have developed a range of research skills and project capabilities x
1.
Plan and complete a major individual piece of research on a contemporary business, management or leadership topic of their choice. x 2.
Demonstrate skills of analysis and synthesis in the application of research methods to the exploration of contemporary business issues.
Goal Six: Have developed specialist knowledge about the theory and practice of your programme of study
1.
Demonstrate specialist functional knowledge in relation to your programme of study.
Assessment Criteria (NBS)
Module Specific Assessment Criteria
Trait
0
Fail
1 – 39
Fail
40 – 49
Fail
50 – 54
Pass
55 – …show more content…
Theories stand apart from, and not synthesized with, relevant organizational examples to provide a comprehensive argument. Demonstrates adequate evidence and knowledge, understanding of chosen paradigm. All learning outcomes are met (or nearly met and balanced by strengths elsewhere).
Some synthesis of theory within analysis to provide a comprehensive argument. Useful organizational examples provided. Greater evidence of linkage between choices of theory for analysis. Paradigm is included and recognizes the paradigmatic presuppositions of theories used. All learning outcomes are met.
Comprehensive synthesis of theory with practice to provide a strong and detailed argument with the help of appropriate organizational examples. Good linkage between theoretical choices for analysis. Paradigm included, and recognizes and understands the implications of the paradigmatic presuppositions of theories used. Good evidence of reading beyond module references. All learning outcomes met, many are more than