Preview

Ideologies of Karl Marx and Adam Smith

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ideologies of Karl Marx and Adam Smith
The ideologies of Karl Marx and Adam Smith would be compared to that of socialism and democracy today; complete government control verses little government control. These two men were completely opposite in their ideologies. As history plays out, it is clear that Marx’s ideologies led to communist control and extremely harsh conditions for the people. Smith’s ideas, on the other hand, encouraged capitalism and growth in the western world. The Marx system supported government control over everything from land ownership and production to owning property and banking. This system would give all control to the state with no local or individual control and ownership. His ideas were supposed to establish democracy: “A government by the people ruled of the majority with representation of the people through elections.” The Marx system was far from a democratic system and eventually led to the complete opposite, communism. In sharp contrast, the Laissez-Faire economics that Adam Smith supported and believed government should not interfere in the free operation of the economy. It supported Free- enterprise with markets producing more goods and making them affordable to all. Capital goods and investments would be privately owned rather than state controlled. The belief of free enterprise would promote general well fare for all. The government would take measures to fight poverty by allowing the people to work for themselves which would create a stronger economy and get rid of mercantilism. His ideas and promotion of less government and free market led to capitalism and great wealth in the western world. The biggest problems that came with capitalism were monopolies. Some government control was necessary in preventing monopolies. The Marx System and Laissez-Faire systems were intended to promote the well fare of all the people and establish a government that would support the people. Marx was viewed as controversial and Adam Smith was viewed as a great leader of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx was the founder of Marxism, which is the system of economic, social, and political philosophy that views social change in…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This era was called the industrial revolution. It was a time of expansion and it was a society fueled by greed. The industrial revolution consisted of wealthy corporations exploiting people of all ages and gender. As there was very little government intervention during this time, businesses went unchecked in their practices resulting in overworked and underpaid employees. The impact of social and economic classes were extremely evident. The poor and underprivileged suffered under the rule of the wealthy and prosperous. The source states that greater opportunity for all will help stabilize a society, which is clear that this is not what happened in the industrial revolution. If there was not such an enormous divide amongst the economic classes of the people there would not have been these atrocities that occurred. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, believed in the ideology of laissez faire economics. Laissez faire economics is described as a way of the economy to be completely free from the government. The industrial revolution is an example of laissez faire capitalism at work, and it is also and example of how it failed the underprivileged horribly. In order to improve the stability of the society during the industrial revolution, the government should have stepped in and provided the people with greater opportunities and the ability to be equal with each other. The 18th and 19th century government being uninvolved with the economy increased the inequality of the classes and the people within them creating an exceedingly unstable…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that all humans were radical and that this directly influenced their organization of government. Similarly, to Locke, Marx classified society into two groups; The Bourgeois and The Proletarians. Marx believed that a ruling class was inevitable, “we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold of gradation of social ranks,” (Marx 9). All though, Marx sees no way to exist without social ranks, he also believes that in this case the bourgeois will join the proletarians in living a good life, “a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologists,” (Marx…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    gilded age

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Although the gap between rich and poor during the late nineteenth was large, the nation was experienced large economic gains. With the end of free labor, the US had sought a new ideology, and found it in Adam Smith’s market model. He essentially wrote the phycology for the business model in which was “The interests of the worker and the master are by no means the same and in the event of an open conflict between them, the…

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith/Hayek wanted very little government interaction because the “Government isn’t the solution to the problem, government is the problem”. Too much government interference would discourage business to start in the United States of the given country. Also the viewpoint is if interest rates are kept artificially low for too long it causes assets to bubble and eventually the bubble will burst. So the government would cause these recessions instead of prevent them in the minds of Hayek and Smith. Smith also had a really positive view on human nature viewing that people were good and competition would drive his or her self interest to make his or her business prosper. However, in reality big business owner often exploit the market and laws in place to kill the competition. This is most notably during the gilded age when big business would form trust and price gouge until the smaller businesses could not sustain causing foreclosure. So industrialization brought in this complexity where no government interaction would be impossible. Industrialization forever changed the world economy and the government's responsibility within it. There are not many similarities between these two theories, the main one is that both believe that markets will eventually self correct themselves, but keynes thinks that…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes, two of the greatest economists ever, had two very different ways of looking at the economy. Adam Smith; born June 5, 1723, was a believer in market economics. Smith believed that the people are usually best left to their own decisions, and concluded that the economy would prosper with the elimination of government involvement. Adam Smith published An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations on March 9, 1776, which is believed to be considered the first modern work in the field of economics. Three main concepts that Smith expands upon within his writings are the division of labor, pursuit of self interest, and freedom of trade. These three main concepts also assisted in the foundation of free market economics. Adam Smith deeply impacted economics in general and helped form some of the various economic systems that are still used today. The "Invisible Hand" is a metaphor created my Adam Smith to describe the self-regulating behavior of the marketplace. Many traces of Adam Smith's work can be found in today's economic systems and structures. He was surely a pioneer to the study and teachings of economics.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ecconomics

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    to buy, sell, and make. As a result individuals profits rise and fall as a…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Marx's system was predicated on the inevitability of class conflict. He believed that modern political systems would be shaped by the resolution of the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All seven economists that were can be compared and contrasted extensively. However, for this essay, Adam Smith, Thomas Robert Malthus, Karl Marx, and Milton Friedman will be compared and contrasted with each other. They all have similarities and differences among their theories and beliefs, but this essay will only discuss a few of them. Smith, considered the father of economics, was a firm believer in a laissez fair method of monitoring the economy. He wanted to leave things alone and work out on their own, rather than have the government step in and control things. Malthus was a pessimistic economist influenced by the economic conditions of the industrial revolution. One of his theories stated that people grow geometrically, while food can only be produced arithmetically. Marx was the father of communism, and believed that history was a constant clash and resolution of opposite ideas. He also developed the labour theory of value that states that the exchange value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of socially necessary value in it. Finally, Friedman was a firm believer in capitalism and a free market. He also thought that government interference was bad and developed the natural rate of unemployment.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism in Of Mice and Men

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    would allow us to live in this world, glistening with perfection . Marx’s system, later known as…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Communism Vs. Capitalism

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout history, there have been many systems developed in order to have a better society and fair society. The question of what form of government or system is best has been brought up repeatedly during history and still is brought up nowadays. Two of the most debated, analyzed and argued about are Communism and Capitalism. Communism is a system of government where everyone and everything is considered equal, you work for the benefit of society. In other words, all the work you accomplish or funds you make go to the government where they make sure it is all redistributed equally to everyone. Two philosophers: Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels captured and theorized the basic concepts of communism. Vladimir Lenin went on to be the key founder…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of the highly restrictive era of trade, due to mercantilism seen in 1776, Smith offered his alternative. Smith proposed that the masses can prosper through unrestricted free trade between…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith to Durkheim

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Smith believes that the government’s role is to provide a social framework which would help each man realize his interest, wealth, uninterrupted. Man is able to pursue his interest the greatest with free market which provides the greatest division of labor, which says Smith, gives rise to the greatest productivity. Any constraints or laws placed that will hinder the natural flow of the market will only bring impediments to it.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Adam Smith advocated a capitalist economy in which people could freely pursue their own self-interest with government repression. But, if pursuit of self-interest led to oppression and greed, that's when the government should intervene with their invisible hand.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx originally aimed to diminish individuality and highly promoted the concept of equality. He has a rather negative outlook on the rule of law and is of the view that it is a mere tool of oppression used by the higher class towards the lower class.…

    • 3079 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays