Preview

Injustice In The Apology After Socrates

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Injustice In The Apology After Socrates
Man was born free, and every where he is in chains. To Socrates, the unexamined life is not free. In the society he knew, justice was overall important, and to him it was as well. The problem was that his beliefs conflicted with the conduct of law in his community, so he would have replied to this quote by saying that a person needs explore themselves or else they just build bars around their lives. In order to explore ones life, questions need to be asked and beliefs need to be challenged, but the law of his time prohibited such acts.
The laws were needed to maintain order and they were for the to prevent injust acts from happening, but at the same time prohibited people to be free. A quote from the Apology after Socrates was convicted, stated, Now I shall depart, convicted by you and sentenced to death, while they go convicted by truth of villainess injustice(18). This statement would seem to say that a person is born free under the laws of justice, but already in chains by those same laws because they, the free born, cannot examine themselves to find There is no less difference between rule over a free person and rule over slaves, than between what is by nature free and what is by nature slavish(186). Any rule or authority puts chains on the people whether it is for order or punishment.
…show more content…
The only true person would not be interested in politics and a person must be content with the presents of others for there to be no coercion. Augustine said, Good man, although he is a slave, is fee; but the bad man is a slave..(201) The bad person is a slave, of there own doing and therefor in the struggle for power and selfishness, that they think can bring them freedom, is leading them farther away from freedom. A good person is free, under the rule of God. Every one is born with the same freedom, yet it is how the person tries to maintain that freedom, that tells which people will put themselves into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. After hearing the oracle, Socrates plans to find a wiser man than himself to…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does Socrates mean when he says that “an unexamined life is no life for a human being to live?”. As I read Plato’s Apology, Euthyphro and The Allegory of the Cave, I could sense two things about unexamined life. First, unexamined life means someone who lives in self-reflection such as sin, guilty, and self-examination. According to Socrates, for living life, the most important one is that should be analyzed and explore the mind itself. One of an important thing, self-reflection of our inner mind gives us the ability to not only understand ourselves more enough but also our relationship with the universe. According to his thinking, without self-reflection, we can give up the chances to evaluate ourselves and our the central axis. In order…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHIL 201 Lesson 2

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The quote: "The unexamined life is not worth living." Socrates didn't mean that people have no value, or should be executed if they lived unexamined lives. Humans are unique in the animal kingdom; we have the ability to reason and reflect about everything. What he meant was: To live the unexamined life is to live less than a fully human life; not living life the way we were created to live.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Socrates Unjust

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires, to avoid self indulgence in evil desires, and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laws were just as important to ancient societies as they are today, keeping an essential balance between interacting individuals. Without them, members of a society would be able to treat their fellow citizens in any way they wished, even if for purely personal gain. Some of these laws were made by the leader or leaders of the society. These were accepted as being for the common good. Other laws were developed within the society, things deemed "socially acceptable." Examples from today might be chewing with your mouth closed and dressing formally for a church service. There were also laws that were set by religious beliefs or moral codes and were highly respected. Breaking these laws would mean doing something like stealing, killing, or cheating. As cultures evolved, and beliefs changed, written, social, and ethical laws often conflicted with each other and created conflicts in society, as described by the play Antigone by Sophocles. In this play, there is a clear conflict between the written law made by the king, and the higher law, dictated by the religious beliefs of the time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Philosophy plays the role of both abstract and concrete at the same time it could be contradicting some situations people might know the truth but refuse to prove it like Socrates in Plato’s Apology. I agree with Bertrand Russell there is a problem with philosophy it’s almost impossible to figure out. Socrates was a wise man because in reality he knew the truth but the jurymen couldn’t prove him of the crime he never confessed to corrupting the young men in fact he questioned the jurymen . I would say good actions would be to convince someone that I’m speaking the truth without meaning any harm “ in socrates case” I would want to live a moral life why live a lie and mislead people especially those you are wanting to influence…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, honor is shown as an irrelevant characteristic. Aurelius believes that honor is not a trait to die for, because both the honored and the ones that honor other will die. Along with that Aurelius states that all human beings are the same in that every person possesses a body, mind in the form of intellect, and a soul. By this reasoning everyone is same and no one is above or below another by profession or status. Aurelius states that one should, “…be free from vain conceit with regard to worldly honours…” meaning that one should not expect or have a desire for bodily praising (Meditations, 1.16).…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not Socrates is truly breaking the law by practicing philosophy is questionable. In the city of Athens it is said that Socrates has corrupted the youth by teaching his incorrect version of philosophy and creating new gods. It is for this reason that he is being wrongly accused and put on trial. Socrates positions in the Apology and the Crito, in regards to following the law, appear to be contradictory to each other but in fact they are consistent in most ways. In the Apology, Socrates states that he would much rather die than refrain from spreading his wisdom of philosophy. In the Crito, Socrates refuses to escape from prison with Crito because he believes that it is morally wrong to intentionally break the law. This is an interesting reason for Socrates to believe this because he is being acquitted for supposedly breaking the law. There is a slight irregularity with Socrates arguments over following the law. In the Apology he seems to have no care…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology is written by Plato of Socrates' trial, at 70 years of age Socrates was accused of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens. Plato’s account consists of three speeches that were given by Socrates during this trial. Socrates speaks before the men of Athens, his jury, in 399 BCE and confesses he has forgotten who he was, he then recollects who he is, and finally he proclaims who Socrates is.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We walk the fine line of the Just and Unjust during Plato's book 2 of The Republic as we listen in to Glaucon insist on achieving concrete answers with Socrates. As Glaucon plays devil's advocate he states that the nature of man is selfish and cruel as it delves into the unjust with the famous tale of the Gyge of Lydian. With such a powerful example, Socrates acknowledges that the urges of the unjust do weigh heavily on individuals, but that the reward of doing a unjust act does not compare to the harm of suffering such an act from others, and that laws in place must hold that line between the two extremes. But how would this system work? Socrates first states that one must recognize certain levels of man depending on their intelligence and…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Socrates, an unjust person is an unhappy person. Why do you believe Socrates made this analogy? How does one become a balanced individual? Furthermore, Plato also has an opinion of what a well-balanced person is. Show how Plato's understanding of a well-balanced person is necessary to a society in harmony with itself, and how that ties in with Socrates’ preceding analogy.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He examined. He examined his life, his purpose, the surrounding people, the culture, the motives, etc., that revolved around him. And thus, by his definition, he lived his life. I very much agree with this technique of living not taking anything as given but questioning what is before me. I do find it hard to agree completely with Socrates in that the “unexamined life is not worth living”. I find this a bit of a blanket statement that leaves many questions to be answered. And I’m sure he would be very pleased with himself to hear me ponder the questions that arise. Anyone who wants to create change, be it scientific, political, economical, spiritual, must question the way of life around them in the world. You cannot produce change if you do not know what is wrong with the way of life. This is how the greater thinkers are born. Yet, this raises the question, should this mean that a man who lives his life going by the things as they are and does not examine his life or the way of life that he has followed should live? Should a man of an unexamined life have his life taken away? Or should he be forced to examine the life he is…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Meaning of Life and Socrates

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece. While he was eventually condemned for his wisdom, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today. When, during his trial, Socrates stated that, "the unexamined life is not worth living" (Plato 45), people began to question his theory. They began to wonder what Socrates meant with his statement, why he would feel that a life would not be worth living. To them, life was above all else, and choosing to give up life would be out of the picture. They did not understand how one would choose not to live life just because he would be unable to examine it.…

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Apology by Plato, passage 38d-39c, Socrates turns his attention to those who voted against him. He expresses that he was convicted because he did the opposite of what they wanted him to do which was to beg for mercy and try to avoid the death sentence like many others do. On the contrary, he was not ashamed or scared to reveal his truth nor did he try to avoid death. Socrates’ tone conveys his strong beliefs of doing what’s right, this idea of justice which is highlighted throughout his defense. Death and truth/justice are two particular themes that come up in this passage. He states that no one should try to avoid death which is easy to do. He explains in his example that in war, one can escape death by surrendering and there are multiple…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This task is based on the accompanying documents. Some of these documents have been edited…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays