Preview

John Locke's Theory In Lord Of The Flies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Locke's Theory In Lord Of The Flies
Canadian cognitive scientist and psychologist Steven Pinker defines the neutrality within humans : “Human nature is complex. Even if we do have inclinations toward violence, we also have inclination to empathy, to cooperation, to self-control.” The novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, focuses on the transition in humans when there is little to no government involved, how one begins to adapt to their surroundings as a result when a group of stranded boys arrive as civilized individuals who unravel into savagery as an act for survival on the island. John Locke’s theories, in Social Contract, State of Nature,and State of Man, are able to relate to the novel as it does not label men as naturally evil nor does it blame government for man’s …show more content…
When it comes to State of Nature, Locke writes in his Two Treatises of Government,“...a state of perfect freedom of acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit within the bounds of the law of nature...The natural state is also one of equality in which all power and jurisdiction is reciprocal...” (Lonang Institute; State of Nature §4). Men are freely allowed to do whatever is necessary as long as there are justifications for their actions and to see that everyone around them is just as equal as themselves. Along with his State of Nature is Locke’s belief of Social Contact: “individuals in a state of nature would be bound morally, by the Law of Nature, not to harm each other in their lives or possession… individuals would agree to form a state that would provide a "neutral judge"...an impartial, objective agent of that self-defense, rather than each man acting as his own judge, jury, and executioner...”(Social Contract-Wikipedia). In other terms, man must form a government that they entrust their lives with by giving them support and power, and in return, the government must protect the people from hurting one another by being the objective factor in the justice system. Finally, in the State of Man, Locke claims that “at birth, the mind was a blank slate or “tabula rasa”... born without innate ideas, and that …show more content…
After Ralph blows a conch, he and Piggy meet the choir boys for the first time and they immediately decide to vote for a leader as described by Golding: “This toy of voting was almost as pleasing as the conch. Jack started to protest but the clamor changed from the general wish for a chief to an election by acclaim of Ralph himself” (28). In this case, democracy, while in progress and decentralized, is used to declare Ralph as the chief on the island as most of the boys trust him having possession of the conch, which symbolizes authority.. Similarly, Locke believes the leader’s power must come from the support of the people involved and it is the leader(s)’ responsibility protect their rights without fear. As chief, Ralph must assume the duty of worrying about everyone’s well-being, survival, and rescue. In other words, Locke’s support in a democracy is reflected through the group’s decision on a chief to make the choices and keep them

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For example, Ralph mentioned that "Jack's in charge of the choir. They can be—what do you want them be?" which means that he wants to share his power with Jack (23). Just like what Locke would do because he believes that if people did the thing it will lead on making good decisions. Also, since Ralph is chief he has to take responsibility on taking care of the kids and making sure they're safe. Ralph is like Locke because Locke believed that "the people" would do the right thing as a group. Therefore, Ralph is an overview of Locke.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A state of nature is not a place, but rather a condition in which no government exists. The idea of state of nature was created by philosopher John Locke, which is relevant to the kids on the island from Lord of the flies. Lord of the flies is a movie about kids who were in a plane crash and landed on an island. They began to make a democracy and government, but they changed into an anarchy because the rules were not followed. John Locke would have been ashamed of life on the island because the rights of life, liberty, and property were not respected.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages” he tells the group (40). With Ralph as the new leader, he sets rules for everyone to follow, giving order to the island. One of the chief symbols of these rules and orderliness is the conch. Before any rules were set, Ralph would blow the conch to signal a “voting time” or a meeting where "every boy would get a chance to…have a vote” (20). The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution grants the right to freedom of speech, which leads to their participation in free elections. Thus, the conch is a symbol for the First Amendment and the polling booth. When a boy has the conch it’s his turn to speak freely, and “vote.” However, when the conch “exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist,” it signaled the end of the island’s democracy, too…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lord of the flies

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the beginning of the novel, Ralph naturally took the leader position. Although not the strongest person on the island, Ralph demonstrates a great understanding of humans, much better than the other boys. This understanding of humans gives him important leadership qualities. Ralph demonstrates his leadership qualities by working towards making the boys’ society better. Ralph understands that the boys need stability and order to survive on the island. To achieve this order, Ralph creates rules and a simple form of government. “Shut up,” said Ralph absently. He lifted the conch. “Seems to me we ought to have a chief to decide things” (pg 22). In this scene the boys are arguing about what should be done in order to survive. Ralph demonstrates his leadership skills by quieting everyone and making it known that order has to be placed if they wish to survive. After this quote the group votes Ralph to be the chief. This is also where the conch is introduced. “And another thing. We can’t have everybody talking at once. We’ll have to have ‘Hands up’ like at school” (pg 33).The conch represents order, where only one boy is allowed to speak so that everyone’s ideas can be heard. This rule placed on the children is to help them from becoming savages and rebels. At the meeting Ralph assigns Jack to be the hunter. While Jack is in charge of the food supply Ralph begins to build huts and thinks about ways to maximize the chance of survival for the boys. During this time the other boys are only…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Treatise of Government by John Locke focuses on the transformation of society from a state of nature to a civil government. The state of nature according to Locke has perfect freedom and individuals govern by reason, whereas a civil government has an established legislative and executive power that has authority. To understand the Treatise on of the very first chapters, titled “The State of Nature”, discusses how men behave in without the legislative and executive powers, or in a sense how they govern themselves. This chapter begins with the idea that all men are born in a perfect freedom and on an equal standing, in which no individual is born with a higher advantage compared to that of another.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A state of nature; a life where no governable state exists and no one possesses political power. ‘Why do we not live in a state of nature?’ some may ask. Why must we be under the government’s power? The first step in understanding why we have something, like the government, is to consider what life would be like without it. There has been many different concepts over time as to what a ‘state of nature’ really is and if life really would be awful without it. Initially, Hobbes believed that in a state of nature, all men would turn ‘nasty and brutish’ and life would turn into a never-ending cycle of crime and war as there would be no one there to stop us. On the contrary, Locke believed that man would be content in a state of nature, that life would be the opposite of awful and we would act morally towards each other due to the social contract. Thirdly, Rousseau thought that if we ever found ourselves in a state of nature, men would turn to savages, but would be happy with it.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time Ralph had found the conche and called everyone into a meeting and they were talking about what should happen and what they should do. “We’ve got to have rules and obey them, after all we're not savages we're English; and the English are the best at everything so we got to do the right things” (pg 34). This relates to Locke because John Locke believes that people need to have a government, vote for things that should happen and he also feels that everyone should be equal. This ties in with what Ralph said because he also thinks that they should have a little democracy. They should have it about what should happen . They should vote for everything and not have someone say what they…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State of Nature In the state of nature, Locke speaks of the natural instincts of human beings as a way of defining political power. He describes the state of nature…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean Jacques Rousseau argues against the theory of original sin and states “nothing can be more gentle than man is in his primitive state.” This remark is also valid for William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Once the young boys establish a sense of order it’s much like Rousseau’s view of government, asserting that government corrupts people. Since Golding’s writing style is allegorical, Lord of the Flies was intended to sprout ideas, not just to tell an interesting story. In Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract he declares democracy was intended for gods, not men, the idea that something will always be wrong with government, and that nations are only teachable in youth, then become irreparable.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke believed that an ideal state such as the state of nature could be governed by one simple law; the law of reason. Locke also wrote that in this state of nature, men are completely equal, “unless the lord and master of them all should… set one above another…” The idealistic state that Locke focuses on, is impossible to reach in his description of it. He says himself that this perfect and equal state is compromised by a “lord and master” who brings hierarchy to the people. This “lord and master” must be the only one with the ability to compromise man’s natural state, and therefore that individual has more power over others. So in reality, this “natural state” was never truly natural because one individual - a master - already had some power over others. Additionally, if this master is able to disrupt the natural state without having to justify his actions and without the consent of others, then this natural state- which can never truly exist in the beginning- is fragile enough that it can fall to pieces from one person’s actions, which means that the natural state may be just as if not more unstable than a government system in which there is an established…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the most influential political philosopher and social contract theorists of all time, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both used ‘The State of Nature’ as a medium in order to understand the basic human nature and natural human rights in their writings. Both, then used their own understanding of the human nature in order to determine and justify the ideal form of government, its role and its powers. However, Locke and Hobbes reach markedly different conclusions. Hobbes argues that every man should concede all of his natural rights to the government and allow it to assume absolute power, while Locke argues that man is entitled to keep his natural rights and a government body is required only in order to protect those certain natural rights.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of nature means to have no government and we have the rights to life, liberty, and property, which were given to everyone by God. There are three parts that make up the state of nature, which include the law of nature, state of equality, and state of liberty. John Locke first describes the state that every person was in. He says that we are all individuals, who are able to act and give away our belongings or ourselves without having to be under…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The state of nature is not a state of license, or a state of authority, in that individuals have the ability to do whatever they want. Although this society is pre-government, morals guide the laws of nature. God gives the natural laws to commands and us that we do not harm others, since we are all equal in the eyes of God. For Locke, the State of Nature is more like a state of liberty that allows the people to pursue their own interests free from interference. It is considered a peaceful state because of the natural laws and its restrictions on the…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conch that was meant to create rule and order ends up enabling the opposite, because it represents power. All of the children, especially the older ones, want power and think it is their right to have it since they are very privileged. To decide on a chief for the island, they hold a vote, and it is almost unanimously decided that Ralph should lead. In the middle of the vote, someone says, “‘Let him be chief with the trumpet-thing.’ Ralph raised a hand for silence” (22). Even though no one had been officially elected yet, Ralph already had the power to order silence because he had the conch. Ralph assumes he has a right to the power, and convinces others of it. His assumption is dangerous to their society because it is risky to select a leader with no reason but a shell they are holding. His sense of entitlement could lead to a bad chief and a bad life for everyone on the island. Later, the strict rule about only talking with the conch is mostly ignored, but still somewhat in place. It continues to cause trouble among the boys, especially when they are discussing matters on which they disagree. When Jack argues with Ralph about who should hunt the beast, Ralph says, “‘You haven’t got the conch...sit down.’ Jack’s face went so white the freckles showed as clear, brown flecks. He licked his lips and remained standing” (102). Jack’s violent nature is revealed when his…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 51 Analysis

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Property- According to Locke, in the state of nature, property is obtained when a man exerts his labor into something and it thus becomes his. For example, when a man picks and apple off a tree the apple is then his because his body and his labor obtained the apple, so it therefore belongs to no one else. In the state of nature, however, a man can only take what he needs, for a surplus of property can only be so advantageous before some of the goods begin to spoil. Therefore, men can barter with each other to obtain their needs and give up their surplus, and eventually the…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays