Preview

mark kasky vs nike

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
mark kasky vs nike
“Marc Kasky versus Nike”

1. What responsibility does Nike have for conditions of work at foreign factories making its products?
The company expanded efforts to stop workplace abuse and started a public relations campaign. It became the only shoe company in the world to eliminate the use of polyvinyl chloride in shoes construction, ending worker exposure to chloride compounds. It revised its conduct code, expanding protections for workers. It set up a compliance department of more than 50 employees. Its staff members were assigned to specific Asian plants or to a region, where they trained local managers and did audits assessing code compliance.
Nike helped to start a voluntary CSR initiative called the Fair Labor Association to enforce a code of conduct and monitoring scheme to end sweatshop labor
The Nike Code of Conduct said that:
*Forced labor: The contractor doesn’t use forced labor in any form-prision, indentured, bonded or otherwise.
*Child labor: The contractor doesn’t employ any person below the age to 16.
*Compensation: Provides each employee at least the minimum wage.
*Benefits: The contractor provides each employee all legally mandated benefits.
*Hours of work/overtime: Contractor employees do not work more than 60 hours per week, or regular and overtime hours allowed by the laws of the manufacturing country.
Extra work is pay.
* Environment, safety and health (ES&H): Nike considers every member of our supply chain like a partner in our business. We work with Asian to achieve specific environmental, health and safety goals.
*Documentation and inspection: The contractor maintains on file all documentation needed to demonstrate compliance whit this code of conduct and required laws.
This are some of the responsibility does Nike have for conditions of work.

2. Could Nike have better anticipated and more effectively handled the sweatshop issue? What did it to right? What was ineffective or counterproductive?
In the early

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    keady, J. (2009, October 2). When will nike "just do it" on the sweatshop issue?. Retrieved from…

    • 5847 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike Ethics Case Study

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For Nike, labor and human rights continues to be a top priority and corporate concern. Ethics is essential in crisis communication. Nike’s sweatshop labor crisis demonstrates the importance of ethics. To defend its practices and public reputation during this crisis, Nike responded to allegations in ethical ways, employing truthfulness and transparency, disclosing their corporate social responsibility statements, including a fair employee treatment and a labor report, and commissioning external investigations for the company’s foreign workers (Kim, 2015). Nike’s response is an example of “contingency thinking” (Schermerhorn et al., 2012) and resulted in the company developing its own code of conduct. Eventually, Nike’s ethical…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every time a company subcontract to a company abroad, they are at risk for lawsuits and allegations for they are not able to manage the work environment and monitor labor practices. “The majority of Nike shoes are made in Indonesia and China, countries that prohibit independent unions and set the minimum wage at rock bottom. The Indonesian government admits that the minimum wage there do not provide enough to supply the basic needs of one person, let alone a family”, (Hill, 2013, p. 155).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nike Controversy

    • 4921 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Poor working conditions have been present for centuries. Often times little or nothing is done unless a tragedy occurs to persuade the public to rally for worker rights. This was definitely the case in the United States during the Industrial Revolution and even late in the 20th Century. These conditions have for most purposes disappeared in the United States, with the exception of some in the agricultural sector. However, internationally, mainly in poor third world countries, that is far from the truth. Large corporations from the United States have moved a large portion of their factories overseas to circumvent the strict working regulations within the United States. The third…

    • 4921 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Knight Nike

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Within Nike 's code of ethics they also stress how important their social responsibility is to the company. They do not only what law requires, but also what is required to be a leader of their industry. To do this their management…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike has been a provider of athletic apparel for years, the Nike Swoosh is a global icon seen from New York, Philippines, China, and Manila just to name a few countries. Nike is synonymous with sporting events of every magnitude and is seen as a multinational presence. In the early 1990’s Nike began to outsource its supply chain operations to contract-factories operating in nations such as Bangladesh, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Moldova, Argentina, Nicaragua, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Turkey, China, and India with more that are not mentioned (Nike, Inc., n.d.). Nike has a reputation to uphold regardless of what country they…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nike Sweat Shop Case

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Nike Inc. is an American multinational corporation that is engaged in the design, development and worldwide marketing and selling of foot wear apparel equipment, accessories and services. It has its shoe’s manufactured on a contractual basic in different places like Asia, Vietnam and China. This case overviews the miserable working conditions where all the manufacturing takes places. It states even though Nike is the leading marketers in the shoe business in the planet but still how the very workers who make the luxury products are being neglected from their basic needs. Although Nike does not hold responsibility of the manufacturing locations in regards to how they operate but Nike has been accused of having its products produced in facilities that exploit workers. It is keenly observed that the basic human rights have been cruelly tarnished under the glittering logo.…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nike - Hitting the Wall

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1) The intension with which it has acted: any corporate’s acts are a manifestation of the values of individuals responsible for making decisions. In my view the most relevant reading that applies to Nike is Kant’s philosophy of acting in good will to others and out of moral duty. Kant believes people should respect the rights and dignity of others. However, by having a supplier selection criterion, which focuses on lowest cost and does not include any information on how the goods are manufactured, by who, where they come from, and how the supplier manages such a low cost, Nike has committed a serious oversight of its duties and moral responsibilities. In the process it has acted in sheer self-interest and has ignored the workers’ rights and dignity. It becomes even more important in Nike’s case because it commands a really high bargaining power and could have easily got any information it wanted.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But even if the employees are directly Nike employees should Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories owned by someone they contractor with. Many believe they should. Nike is technically removed from responsibility in some parts but as a company doing business with another company they have a certain level of obligation as well. When Nike hired the sub-contractors they could have inquired about the pay and working conditions that the workers of subcontractors receive. Let’s face it Nike contracts would be large enough to argue the subcontractor may not exit if it wasn’t for the Nike business, why wouldn’t Nike executives want to take a look around do some fair investigating about who they are going into business with. If Nike had done it’s due diligence they may have been a head of all the attacks and protesting by chosen to make improved working conditions a part of the arrangement, them those benefits may have been passed on to the workers. Let’s not forget that Nike is a publicly owned firm whose goal is to improve the wealth of its shareholders, so maybe no one asked the hard questions because they didn’t…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tnc Research Paper

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hartman L, Wokutch R (2003) Nike, Inc.: corporate social responsibility and workplace standard initiatives in Vietnam. In: Hartman L, Arnold D, Wokutch R (eds) Rising above sweatshops. Praeger, Westport pp 145-190…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why should Nike be held responsible for what happens in factories that are not owned by the company? Is Nike’s responsibility to monitor their subcontractors a legal, economic, ethical or a philanthropic responsibility? What could Nike have done,…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike and Human Rights

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical issues may include the violation of fundamental human rights of ‘sweatshop’ workers such as freedom, speech and discrimination. The treatment of their workers could be deemed ‘unethical’ by media who construe this view to consumers. Such allegations can and will have damaging effects with Nike having been taken to court already in the past.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nike’s business model was based in outsourcing its manufacturing, then using the money it saved on aggressive marketing campaigns. However, the process of outsourcing work internationally proved to be problematic for Nike in a variety of ways particularly in regards to low wages provided workers and poor working conditions and environment. This paper intends to evaluate Jeff Ballinger’s argument against Nike, as well as determine how convincing Nike’s response was to Ballinger’s allegations. Lastly, strategies are provided as to how Nike moves forward after the smoke of the crisis has cleared.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is ironic to see how an organization like Nike would response to its negative labor practices in quite an immature way, especially when it carries a big brand image in the industry and has a lot on stake to lose; with respect to its loyal clientele and future growth opportunities. In my opinion, Nike’s approach was almost prohibitive, specifically for the initial few years. I agree, later on in May, 1998 Knight announced a series of sweeping reforms however; what is shocking to me, it took Nike roughly 18 years to realize that some serious steps are needed to address the allegations and their future steps must go beyond and over than what they had committed themselves to. Nike was pressed by the circumstances to think this way as their bottom line had truly started to suffer. Evidently, since 1980’s the corporation had been plagued by a series of labor incidents and public relations nightmares but what has astounded me is “despite the criticism; they insisted that labor conditions in its contractors’ factories were not — could not — be Nike’s concern or its responsibility”. Initially, Nike was moving quite fast from one country to another just to accomplish their low cost manufacturing agendas. It is quite relevant, applicable and fair for any organization to outsource where they can save cost but it should not be on someone else expense where the organization is violating human rights and/or the labor is not even making enough to meet their bare minimum necessities. All these bad business practices of Nike got them in mainstream where they were not able to come up with innovative ideas to be in command of this bad publicity. As the matter was heating up Nike did try to address many issues which are surely commendable but the major issue of workers minimum wage was never resolved up until 1998. This is exactly where Nike was getting benefited from (low-wages). In response to the entire kiosk, Nike did…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ethics

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nike has been plagued over the years with an array of allegations suggesting that its products are manufactured under sweatshop conditions in developing nations. Investigate and discuss the various allegations that have been made over the years, and the defenses Nike has raised. Are the charges against Nike legitimate? What recommendations would you make to Nike going forward, to address this…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays