Preview

Miss

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miss
Using these four passages and your own knowledge, asses the view that the breach between Edward IV and Warwick was entirely the result of the Earl’s uncontrolled ambition
When Edward IV claimed the throne in the Battle of Townton and established the Yorkist dynasty, it was thought that this young and strong man would rule without problems from those other than the Lancastrians. However in 1469 his closest adviser and ‘king maker’, Warwick turned against him in favour of the weak Lancastrian Henry VI. It is argued that it was Warwick’s own selfish and uncontrolled ambition which led to this breach between two friends, however numerous factors may have also caused this end, for example Edwards unscrupulous marriage to Elizabeth Woodville and the differing opinions to foreign policy, which would lead to the breach in friendship and yet another war between the Lancastrians and Yorkist leaders.
John Gillingham’s Interpretation B would suggest a divided argument on the breach between these two great friends being caused by both Warwick’s uncontrolled ambition and the King’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. It agrees with the Interpretation in that Gillingham believed that Warwick was discontent with the power granted by Edward although he much believed that he had put the Yorkist on the throne, and had expected more gratitude through access to power. “English policy should be Warwick’s policy”, which assesses well the interpretation that Warwick saw himself as the ‘puppeteer’ behind Edwards reign. This view is also shared by Charles Ross’ source A, of which states that although Warwick was showered in patronage, for example being granted wardship of Francis Lovell and having Richard of Gloucester (this King’s prized possession) installed into his household; he refused to “accept anything less than domination over the king”. This suggests that Warwick indeed saw himself as ’The King Maker’ and true mind behind the rule of England which can be substantiated by Warwick’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edward Vi Foreign Policy

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When analysing the foreign policy of Edward VI’s reign, it is essential that one recognises that Edward was a minor and it was his protectors, the Dukes of Somerset an Northumberland, that were chiefly responsible for England’s foreign policy at this time. While there is debate on this topic, it is generally documented that the foreign policy of Edward’s reign was not as successful as the previous Tudors.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Edward came into power in 1042, England was in a poor state financially and also because of threats of an invasion and this made the first few years of his rule difficult. Edward was faced with many problems which he had to overcome. These problems involved; powerful Earls, (especially the Godwine’s), the foreign policy and the domestic policy. Edward both failed and succeeded in these problems due to a number of factors. These include a lack of knowledge about his kingdom and some may argue that he was naïve in his decisions. With some evaluation, we will be able to judge if Edward was a successful King or not.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth I is a one of the main known rulers of England. She brought in the “Golden Age” of Britannia. Many books that are written about Elizabeth chronologically tell about her decisions and how they affect England and the rest of Europe. Most of the books are biographies but, Christopher Haigh’s book Elizabeth I is not merely a biography but a detailed account on how Elizabeth and the people around her influenced each other and how that affected Elizabeth’s reign. In Christopher Haigh’s book Elizabeth I: Profiles in Power, his main argument and thesis is that Elizabeth had to play a dangerous game throughout her life and rule to keep England balanced with illusion.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It states that the Duke of Somerset at the time “dominates and rules about the king’s person”, the Duke of Somerset was a favoured noble of Henry VI’s, especially liked by Margaret of Anjou. The source is suggesting that the Duke of Somerset controlled some of the decisions made by the king, referencing towards the loss of Normandy by his army. Henry VI was not very wise, certainly when it came to ruling the country, allowing himself to be ruled by the nobles around him, this could be one of the reasons for his lavish expenditure. Therefore, this source does support the claim that the over-mighty nobility was a big reason for the outbreak of the wars, but also gives evidence of Henry VI being a weak king, after all he had the power to put a stop to the problems Somerset was causing but he did little to stop…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James I had many questions asked about his ability and potential to be King of England. He had many critics saying that the only reason he was King, was as he was the only one in line to the throne and his ability as a King was not good enough to deserved the throne. There were many views about him at this point of time and this was one of many. This may have been due to his mix repertoire as King of Scotland. In this essay, I will debate whether I believe James was a suitable candidate to become the King of England.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1 scene 4 of “King Richard III”, Shakespeare explores the concept of free will clashing with Providentialism through the debate between Clarence and the two Murderers. Shakespeare juxtaposes Clarence’s dream with his murder in order to affirm the value of Providentialism and the Great Chain of Being which underpinned Elizabethan hierarchical society. On wakening from his dream, Clarence describes the torment of his soul in Hell at the behest of Warwick and the murdered Prince Edward who, “dabbled in blood” demands that the furies “take him in torment”. Clarence accepts his crimes and the punishment which is to be his as a just outcome of Providentialism, praying only that God “spare my guiltless wife and children”. This is immediately juxtaposed with the entrance of the two Murderers who, in their decision to murder a Prince, represent the rising power of secularism and free will. Shakespeare explores this dichotomy in Clarence’s pleas for his life; firstly he appeals to their secular greed, promising that “my brother Gloucester…shall reward you” for his life and, when this fails, asks if they “will war with God” by murdering him. Shakespeare’s use of emotive language such as “beastly, savage, devilish” draws attention to the crisis of…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A child born in the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, at the end of the year 1600, was to inherit this hitherto unquestioned office, and apparently to inherit it undiminished in reputation or effect. He was to come to the kingship of his fathers in true descent of the Blood Royal, and , destined as it would seem, to administer as those before him had administered and to hand on this same power and majesty to his posterity. Yet in the lifetime of that child- and it was not a long one, monarchy in England crumbled, or rather was destroyed. He himself acted that tragedy and took the tragic part therein. First he was thwarted by his more powerful subjects through his early years, from the day when as a young man of twenty-five he came to his own when he had not long passed his fortieth year. They gradually destroyed his national forces, they triumphed over him, they belittle him by one humiliation after another, and at last, before he had reached his fiftieth year, they put him to death. With him died the English monarchy- he was the last ruling King of England, the last who goverened as Kings had goverened for untold years. His virtues destroyed the Crown of England and the power thereof.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miss

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, it is possible that Buckingham wanted to be seen as a kingmaker. He had helped Richard III take the throne but maybe Buckingham couldn’t control Richard as well as he thought he would be able to. Henry Tudor was in Brittany, planning an invasion, but Tudor had not even seen England since he was fourteen. He needed the support of a rich noble to finance his invasion and provide him with men. As Buckingham was one of the richest, most powerful men in the country, he could have offered this support to Tudor. This would allow him to remove Richard III from the throne and place Henry Tudor upon it; making him the one who ultimately, had the most power. It is evident from the fact that on Christmas day 1483 Henry Tudor announced that when he became king he would marry Elizabeth of York (the daughter of Elizabeth Woodville and Edward IV) that Tudor was in contact with the Woodvilles. The Duke of Buckingham was married to…

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth I is widely known as a great and beloved English ruler, despite the fact that her motivations were questionable. Henry VIII is often considered as a vicious, autocratic ruler by historians, but in fact much of what he did strengthened England as a country and military force. In this essay, there will be a closer look at the true accomplishments of these rulers. By the end, it will be evident that Henry is the greater ruler.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A “Shadow in the Sun”: Green-eyed Baby Brother’s Blues There is victory in all but Richard Gloucester whose internal battlements still smoke, with their muzzles pointed sunward. Accepting his fate given title of “villain,” (30) Gloucester isolates himself from the “glorious summer” (2) of triumph to release his frustration and self pity - lending the play both voice for foreshadow and basis for thematic growth. As Gloucester begins his sorrowing, he reflects upon the war, where he was “arms” (6) in arms with his brothers until the victorious end when War “capers nimbly” (12) away to rest. Although Gloucester was there making “dreadful marches” (8) he does not gain any “delight” (8) nor relief as his brothers have.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is clear that there is a prominent struggle in the balance of power between the monarch and the subject that is represented in the two early modern texts Edward II by the playwright Christopher Marlowe and the poem The dowbt of future foes exiles my present joye by Queen Elizabeth. The monarch of each text is losing support from their once loyal followers and subjects by intertwining public responsibility and personal desire. In this essay I will use these texts to demonstrate each monarch’s power struggles as a result of their subjects. I will also use secondary sources of criticism to confirm the points that are made in this essay.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We firstly know that Edward Was born in England but raised in Normandy thus meaning that Normandy could have first acquired a taste upon him meaning that he would prefer it to England. At this time there were many Viking raids going on within England. Sweyn took the throne in 1013 but later died in 1014 thus Aethlred sent Edward back to his ambassadors. Aethlred died in 1016 making Edmund Ironside (Edwards’s half brother) take up the fight against Cnut (Sweyn’s son) He also died leaving Edward to go into exile with his brother and sister, but his mother married Cnut even after all he had done possibly making an even bigger hatred for anything or anyone to do with England.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Norman Conquest

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * William of Normandy – nephew of Edward, claimed that Edward promised him the throne and that Harold II of had sworn agreement to this.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays