Preview

How to Poison the Earth: An Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
681 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How to Poison the Earth: An Analysis
"How to Poison the Earth": An Analysis

The two main purposes Linnea Saukko has in "How to Poison the Earth" are persuasive and referential aims. She uses examples classification and descriptions to help the reader better understand the future of the planet if humans keep on the same path of destruction.

The main modes she uses in the first paragraph are cause and effect, and later classification of pollution into ground water and air methods is used Saukko starts the essay off by saying, "Poisoning the earth can be difficult because the earth is always trying to cleanse and renew itself." She not only uses sarcasm to make reader think what she is saying is meant to taken literally, but she classifies the main methods to poison the earth. She stress the need for toxic chemicals like uranium-238, plutonium, PCB, and DDT. Along with the need to spread those chemicals around the earth, she starts to persuade the reader that if those two parts happen, we will poison the earth.

The next two paragraphs she emphasizes several ways to spread the toxins into the shell of the earth. She classifies those into deep-well and shallow-well injections, and dumping. The deep-well injections are to "ensure that the earth is poisoned all the way to the core," while the shallow-well injections are to contaminate groundwater aquifers. In paragraph two she gives the reader examples of deep-well and shallow-well injections and how these will ensure that the core is poisoned. The third paragraph ties to the second by explaining that if humans place dumps by groundwater that this method and shallow-well injections will poison the water. Saukko sarcastically states that since there are only 50,000 dumps in the United States," they should be located in areas where they will leak to the surrounding ground and surface water."

In paragraphs four, five, and six Saukko uses cause and effect to show how to bring pesticides and other poisons to lakes, rivers, and oceans. She explains that if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Finally, Annie Leonard’s script from her video “The Story of Bottled Water” describes how the producers of bottled water have taken over the market for water and have skewed the public’s perception of tap water in order to sell their product. Each of these pieces of work connects technology with a way in which it harms the environment. When militaries occupy land, they open up new ways for people to affect the environment in negative ways. One way that humans have affected the environment in a negative way as a result of militaries that occupy land is that they have asserted their inherent call to protect Earth and are deciding the fate of animals.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Toxico Oil Spill Outline

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Transition –Researchers and biologists (hired in some cases by the mining companies themselves) carry out independent studies to pacify the concerns of the local population. They often conclude that the rising levels of these toxins in the water supply are mainly due to a natural occurrence and has little or no connection in the oil or mining operations nearby.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of Linnea Saukko’s “How to Poison the Earth” is to explain the process of poisoning the Earth. Saukko utilizes sarcasm throughout the essay while explaining the process of poisoning the Earth. For example, Saukko infers that since the earth continually undergoes renewal, humanity should produce more waste from uranium-238 and plutonium due to their longer half-life (Saukko 309). The ironic tone of the essay does not take away from the directive process analysis exhibited throughout the text. For instance, Sauko explains that releasing poisonous substances around the planet at a rate that the Earth could purge is how to efficiently poison the earth (Saukko 310). Furthermore, Suakko’s use of irony highlights the drastic consequences…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    it causes the reader to come to the realization how humans are currently poisoning the earth.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She achieves this by providing evidence that supports her claim and also by creating a space in which the reader becomes aware of their surroundings and overall health. This also gets the audience to start caring about the world around them and the methods they can implement in their day-to-day lives to better care for it. She further appeals to the audience by mentioning her experience in the industry, writing,” As an environmental justice scholar who works directly with low-income and communities of color, I see incineration as a poor waste management option.” (Section 1). Mentioning this allows her to establish trust with a wider audience by building credibility with the reader.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popsicle Cycle Analysis

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The flora and fauna of the world is delightful to humankind, much like a popsicle might be a delight to an individual. When one considers the rainforests and the deforestation that takes place there in order to support a growing human population, this relates to the consumption of the popsicle. People may neglect to think about the consequences of deforestation or the use of fossil fuels, even though they may be a participant in these processes through their consumption of paper products or devices that need energy. The person consuming the popsicle might also be in denial about the impermanence of the popsicle, or the consequences of consuming it. Russ Crest, an author at Beautiful Decay magazine, says of Myers and Berg’s work; “ Sometimes something must be broken or fractured in order for us to see its value. This may be especially true for our environment. Only when we see the consequences of our actions do we begin to understand our complicity in fracturing it” (Crest). People do not notice the destruction of the environment until awareness is brought to it, either in their real life or in news media. Until then, people take nature for…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People’s primary source of concern is health. This is obviously understandable. Chemicals scare people, especially the amount involved in fracking. However, the chemicals involved in fracking are no stronger than your average household bleach. Most of the chemicals used are used every day in normal processes. The substances that are put down a well are bentonite clay, which is used in wine making, xanthan gum polymer, which is used in salad dressing, water, calcium chloride brine, which is electrolytes, lime, fatty acids, which are plant fats and barite, which is used in medical imaging. Most of these completely harmless and are used normally everyday. As an extra safeguard, the well is entirely cased in concrete. At the surface, there are six layers of casing. These six layers go down to around 400 meters deep. This is below the lowest water table recorded in New Zealand. Between 400 meters and 2000 meters there are four…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This entry focuses mainly on the chemical DDT, which is over consumed on various vegetation, however, the overall idea is regarding our environment and how human actions are abolishing it, although it may be unintentional. To be more specific, the central idea consists of the environmental actions that are backfiring on our population in a negative way. Furthermore, in my opinion, Rachel Carson desires to spread awareness about the harmful deeds that are destroying our environment and our society’s health.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Saukko and Ehrlich both strongly express their concern for the environment in their essays and they both use process analysis, but the way they approach the readers differs. Saukko’s essay focuses on the pollutants that jeopardize life and Ehrlich essay focuses on what environmental issues affect glaciers. Saukko uses satire to engage the reader and her ironic tone is a contribution. Ehlrich’s essay approaches the reader through personal experience, her details and descriptions make the essay informative attracting a specific reader. Both essays are interesting, each with distinct methods but overall informative while complimenting each other. s requires you to break the…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "The Obligation to Endure," Rachel Carson explains how man is destroying earth because of the advancements in science, along with the continuous use of numerous chemicals. During her essay, she points out to the reader that humans continue to use chemicals to produce our products since they like having the ability to manage the growth of the plants. Carson argues that the use of chemicals is damaging "poisoning" nature along with destroying our environment…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These features also have a role to make the audience believe that human action is to blame for it occurrence, and how we as a human population can change its course. The second most obvious purpose is to invite anyone to take action in preventing climate change.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming a Spanish Teacher

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Rachel Carson main point in “Negotiating the Environment” part I is that the place she is describing might not exist, but what does exist is the fact that every disaster she mentioned has happened somewhere. The story is an effective way to put this point across because the reader can get the idea of what could happen and how the world will look if we don’t take care of it. Her main argument in part II is that humanity is destroying nature with all the contamination and substances being used. She does appeal to logic and reason. She gives examples of what could happen and she establishes reasons of why we should believe her because she gives facts and not just her opinions.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    more than half of the book is devoted to various cases of the misuse of pesticides to…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Climate Change

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Saukko’s writing, she gives specific examples of how to poison the earth, without really wanting to poison the earth, but rather to inform her audience. She does this very well because she gives specific examples of how to do it. This helps us to understand what exactly is causing these problems in our environment. In her essay, she gives an example of the poison plutonium and how we should store it in deep parts of the earth. Not only does she give the example of the poison, but she also tells us where it is stored. She also goes on…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One hundred and fifty years prior thus far, the monster started in a few cities, this city had turned into a position of industry, industrial facilities developed on the scene like weeds, trees fell, and fields were built-upon, streams darkened because of pollution. Pollution can appear as synthetic substances or energy, for example, sound, temperature or light, we can define pollution as the act of making something impure and often unsafe or unsuitable for use caused by people. Although some people live in a highly polluted city, there are several arguments that explain the danger of living there, among which are air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution and the quality of life.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays