Political Influence On Canada
Is it possible for one simple ballot to create such an incredible impact on Canada’s welfare? Or is it a tad bit exaggerated, opposed to the in-depth and precise political aspect of thinking? In regards to the most recent election, Canada’s political parties have many differing viewpoints on the political, economical, and social forms of the “True, North, Strong, and Free” country that we all live in. In terms of politics, Canada’s primary parties, like the Conservatives and Liberals, target a multitude of issues. One of those can be the “Justice” system of policies and laws. A Conservative government perceives that they should decriminalize Marijuana, due to the possible dangerous outcomes from these drugs, and simply because of people
…show more content…
However, the Liberal party would consider utilizing Marijuana only for Personal and Medical Usage, albeit that personal usage is regulated, so it wouldn’t be used for such reasons as aforementioned. Furthermore, the Conservatives are also considering the use of a ticketing system for authorities to penalize others for inhaling 30g of Marijuana or less since the surveillance is felt a bit abysmal. With both ideas shared, it is possible to look at the differentiating on how such a topic like marijuana can be looked upon both the generic, and stereotypical basis of marijuana or delve deeper and try to examine how it can be different.
An equally important affair that is debated can be the environment, since it is one of the most argumentative subjects there is to date. For instance, the Kyoto Protocol was an international global treaty created for protecting any environment that was left and to do so, they needed money from 192 countries, Canada being one of them. However, Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister at the time, withdrawn from said protocol, as he felt that …show more content…
One of these ways can be from the pipelines that are part of the plan for the Conservatives and Liberals. The Conservatives plan on using the Keystone XL pipeline as a way to show an import/export trade using oil and other goods from Alberta to the US, and B.C. For B.C, the residents voted No, because they felt as if Enbridge, the workers behind the pipeline, needed to remind the US that they, “... Need an earlier, stronger presence on the ground”, meaning that they needed to have a more reasonable explanation for their contribution. Furthermore, the idea was dismissed due to the fact that the US president, Barack Obama, said it, “... would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our economy”, and that it would lower gas prices significantly. The Liberals would also support the said pipeline though they had made it clear for them to oppose the Northern Gateway Pipeline project, stating that, “... if you’re going to build a pipeline that goes through nearly one of the most vulnerable and beautiful ecosystems in the world… you have to have a better plan than what it looks like...”. Another example that they want to help the economy with is the tax brackets. The Liberals promised that the tax brackets for middle-class families would be in their favor as they plan to cut the tax bracket from 22% to 20.5%. For the Conservatives, they plan on cutting the tax
However, the Liberal party would consider utilizing Marijuana only for Personal and Medical Usage, albeit that personal usage is regulated, so it wouldn’t be used for such reasons as aforementioned. Furthermore, the Conservatives are also considering the use of a ticketing system for authorities to penalize others for inhaling 30g of Marijuana or less since the surveillance is felt a bit abysmal. With both ideas shared, it is possible to look at the differentiating on how such a topic like marijuana can be looked upon both the generic, and stereotypical basis of marijuana or delve deeper and try to examine how it can be different.
An equally important affair that is debated can be the environment, since it is one of the most argumentative subjects there is to date. For instance, the Kyoto Protocol was an international global treaty created for protecting any environment that was left and to do so, they needed money from 192 countries, Canada being one of them. However, Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister at the time, withdrawn from said protocol, as he felt that …show more content…
One of these ways can be from the pipelines that are part of the plan for the Conservatives and Liberals. The Conservatives plan on using the Keystone XL pipeline as a way to show an import/export trade using oil and other goods from Alberta to the US, and B.C. For B.C, the residents voted No, because they felt as if Enbridge, the workers behind the pipeline, needed to remind the US that they, “... Need an earlier, stronger presence on the ground”, meaning that they needed to have a more reasonable explanation for their contribution. Furthermore, the idea was dismissed due to the fact that the US president, Barack Obama, said it, “... would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our economy”, and that it would lower gas prices significantly. The Liberals would also support the said pipeline though they had made it clear for them to oppose the Northern Gateway Pipeline project, stating that, “... if you’re going to build a pipeline that goes through nearly one of the most vulnerable and beautiful ecosystems in the world… you have to have a better plan than what it looks like...”. Another example that they want to help the economy with is the tax brackets. The Liberals promised that the tax brackets for middle-class families would be in their favor as they plan to cut the tax bracket from 22% to 20.5%. For the Conservatives, they plan on cutting the tax