Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Political System for Pakistan

Good Essays
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political System for Pakistan
* A democratic Pakistan OR An autocratic Pakistan. Which, in your opinion, is better equipped at consolidating our status as a “federation” and Why?

A democratic country means a type of government running in a country which is elected by the people where a president and a prime minister has his own powers and is bound to stick to those powers only which are granted to him by his post While in Autocracy the meaning is totally opposite it is a common misconception that autocracy is more like dictatorship while in my view dictatorship and autocracy are quite different things. In Dictatorship there is a leader who is being dictated by other person mainly the overruling personality or the party, while an autocrat is a type of a leader who posses all the powers to do anything that he wants like a dictator but I would like to repeat my words “He has all the powers to do anything that HE wants” which means he is ruling the country the way he wishes.
Pakistan now is in such a state where it is neither a democratic nor an autocratic. The American dictation is still being copied down by the men in power; the powers are being kept limited due to the immense intervention of media and the judiciary in the state affairs, while the decision taken by the Officials are declared as unjust and a hurdle is some how managed to be created to terminate the order before it reaches the destination. In a country where none of the many types of the government is given a chance to grow how can one think of a consolidated status as a federation?
Democracy has its own fruit. A place where the representatives of the people will talk about their problems and would be sincere enough to solve the problems then democracy is the best but if you go for the other side of the page you find those Representatives caught guilty of many crimes themselves like one of the major issue faced in the previous days was of the fake degree cases against many of the Member’s of Parliament. This point makes one a little confused or I would better say double minded that what has a degree got to do with the representative of the people, but suddenly my mind is struck by the other idea that whether a person who is not literate enough would be able to convey his ideas or problems in a better manner?
Autocracy must be given a chance where no one should be given a chance to intervene in the state affairs and a fully capable leader should be given a chance to run the country his way. Let not the political parties have a single percent of say in how the country is being governed for the specified period of time. In my opinion Autocracy is the only solution for bringing the state into a consolidated form of federation.

By Sanaullah Khan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) As I almost always come back to, instability is a big piece of history and politics of Pakistan. There has been little to no faith in the government from the people, except from those that it benefits (which is really a small percentage).…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy is a system in which people decide matters as a group; people have the right to do as they want and vote. When making the laws in this government citizens make the decisions and to a certain extent the government follows. One country that has a successful Democracy is America, because of it’s economy and the different ways that make the people feel safe. For example,…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is directly translated to people rule. The greek word demokratia is broken down into kratos meaning rule and demos meaning people. A government ruled by the people is strong, because there is an even playing field. There is representation from every one. If the people are the ones who the rules and regulations are for they should have a say in what they are. The only…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though there is no exact definition of a democracy, it does “refer to a regime whereby political power is widely spread,” (68 Gerner, Ferdinand, and Lawson) and involves equality when it comes to politics. In a democracy, the people run the government. This system is thought to have four key elements: a system in which the government is chosen or replaced through free and fair elections, active participation of the people in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights for all the people, a rule of law in which the laws and procedures are equally applied to all the citizens. In a democracy, the people are sovereign because they are the highest form of political authority. They are the ones that “choose their leaders and hold their…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy, by far, is viewed as being a much more equal, reliable and honest form of government organisation, to comparison with a monarchy or a dictatorship, where the individuals of a state have very little or no say at all to the ruling and management of their country.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in terms of economy Democracy may not necessarily lead to great economic development. Democratic governments have a limit to how much they can oppress economic contributing factors like predation. Dictatorships usually have a better control over their people; only allowing them to promote factors which they think would grow their economy. However, Democracy leads to a situation whereby the economic growth cannot be totally enforced by the government onto the people as everyone is supposed to have equal rights, not necessarily promoting the economical growth.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pakistan: A Weak State

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After independence from the British in 1947, President Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan was very clear: he wanted peace, good governance, tolerance and a state able to adhere to a rule of law. Unfortunately, this vision was never transformed into reality; the nation created as a home for the British India’s Muslims six decades ago today represent one of the world most troubling states in crisis (Crisis Guide: Pakistan).Why can’t Pakistan flourish? What makes Pakistan such a weak state?…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people are free and they have their human right. Such as in the United States, we have the bill of right, the first ten amendments. We have freedom to speech; have the right to vote for our government. We also have written rule to limit our government that no one is above the law. Therefore everybody have equal opportunity to success. Moreover, democracy trend to have peaceful power transaction, such as our President we voted for it every four years. However, there are also disadvantages in democracy. Discussion making is slow in democracy since it has to be voted on and pass through many steps. It also has weaker military during peacetime. In addition, since people have more freedom and the government not strict as dictatorship, it usually has higher crime rate and has a wider disparity between rich and poor.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Spina, Cha & Dana Cha, 2011) The biggest virtue of a democratic government is that it represents the views of the majority. Autocracy is a system of government by a single person with absolute power, usually characterised by exerting force to take control of a group of people reluctant to be under his rule. A fundamental problem of politics in the past, and even the present, is that autocracy and dictatorship should be avoided. Such systems undermine the individual’s liberty, as the autocrat is the driving force behind all decisions of the state, giving little or no consideration to his advisers. It is such that these tyrants of state leadership sometimes make wrong decisions which led to the decimation of many human lives. Adolf Hitler of Nazist Germany is a famous example of an autocratic leader. Hitler was power hungry; his lofty goal led to the epoch of World War II, causing the deaths of 17 million people. Another example is of Joseph Stalin, past leader of the Soviet Union, and the cause of the Holodomor. Almost half a million Ukrainian civilians who objected to Stalin’s new law of agricultural collectivisation were shipped to remote areas such as Siberia where they are left to fend for themselves, which will lead to their eventual deaths. Democracy is the contrast and thus a preferred form of government in comparison to autocracy.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto assumed control of Pakistan in the aftermath of the debacle that was 1971: the State of Pakistan had lost more than half of its population and a major source of revenue to a secessionist movement, its army was humiliated with almost ninety-three thousand prisoners of war in hostile Indian custody, and the economy was in complete turmoil. Bhutto’s rallying cry of ‘Roti, Kapra, Makaan’ had allowed him to win the majority seats in West Pakistan in the elections of 1970, and with the secession of East Pakistan in 1971, the path to the presidency was clear. Certain historians and political analysts have credited Bhutto with pulling Pakistan through the darkest period of its history, but in ‘Signposts to a Police State’, Eqbal Ahmad, argues that Bhutto might have done more damage to Pakistan than good. To support this claim he draws attention towards personality flaws of the man himself which resulted in certain damaging policy decisions. In addition to this, Eqbal also shows how the balance of power within the country was shifting in the military’s favor, partial responsibility of which he places on Bhutto. ‘Signposts to a Police State’ is then a critique of Bhutto’s policies in the period 1972-1974, based on which Eqbal attempts to give a prognosis of the direction in which Pakistan was headed politically.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a Democracy decisions and laws are well thought out and voted on before they go into effect. In the case of a bad law or decision, there are many fail safe to keep order, unlike in dictatorship…

    • 300 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution should provide for a Federation of Pakistan in its true sense on the Lahore Resolution and the parliamentary form of government with…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.The Government of Pakistan is a federal government established by the Constitution of Pakistan. Pakistan is a democratic parliamentary federal republic with Islam as the state religion.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On a concluding note, we can say that Democracy is one of the best system of Government for Pakistan,…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Study of Democracy

    • 1558 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pakistan, like India, adopted the Government of India Act, 1935 as the Interim Constitution, 1947 to meet the immediate requirements of an independent state. It provided parliamentary form of government, although the Governor General enjoyed special powers and the federal government exercised some overriding powers over provinces. Pakistan's early rulers did not pay especial attention to…

    • 1558 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays