Preview

Research Outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Outline
Name: Samantha Filpes
Date:
Period:
Issues Research Paper

Topic: Human Cloning

Issue: Is human cloning right?

Background: There is many opinionated answers if human cloning is right or wrong. As of now, Human cloning is illegal, although in the future it might change. There is many pros and cons to the effect of human cloning and the whole idea of it. | Evidence: “ With the advancement and expansion of technology science has been able to achieve new wonders. These improvements and discoveries in science have allowed the human race to explore and learn more about the world. One such phenomenon is cloning. Cloning has opened the doors to explore human beings in a way that was once never possible. With cloning the human body, as well as other organisms, will be studied. Cloning and genetic engineering will both come into play to improve scientific knowledge.” (Serendip, 1)Citation: ( Serendip, Cloning right or wrong)Evidence: Many people believe human cloning should be banned prior to human defects, health problems, not proper treatment, and many other things. Human cloning Has not been exactly successful, and most of the time it has failed. However, scientist are trying to figure things out and fix itCitation: ( Serendip, Cloning right or wrong) |

Pro/Con Chart with Evidence Pros | Cons | 1. If someone were to lose another person, they would be able to clone them.Evidence # 1: This can be another way of cheating death in a way, by reproducing a loved one that they had just lost. Although it wouldn’t be the exact same person, just a twin.Citation: (WiseGeek, Benefits of Cloning)Evidence #2: The woman can have the person who has recently died DNA transferred into her egg, and usually have the same genetic potential.Citation: ( Humanhealthcare, Ethical Issues of Human Cloning)Evidence #3: People have frozen dead loved ones cells until future cloning.Citation: ( nbcnews, Conveting a Clone)Evidence #4: If One was to lose a child in birth , they



Citations: ( Yenra, Pros and Cons of Human Cloning) | |

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Research Paper Outline

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A. Lee Harvey Oswald went to the Soviet Union during a time of terrorism between the Soviet Union and the United States also known as “The Cold War”.…

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    research paper outline

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This evaluation will determine the reliability of the narrator, how Connie’s sense of entitlement affects her as a narrator and point of view, and the historical events that inspired the author.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While a large portion of society do not believe that we should clone any species there is the portion that whole heartedly support the quest to prefect not only the cloning of animals but the cloning of humans. By cloning we can create new ways to fight diseases and other health problems by doing things like cloning a liver for a person whose is shutting down. Cloning can also help bring a species back from the brink of extinction due…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    research outline

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because of many people abusing the welfare system people automatically turn a blind eye to single mothers, but what people fail to realize is that it takes a lot to raise a child. Most people dont understand that on average it cost 94,774 dollars to take care of a child, and thats not including the 86,824$ a parent will spend on a public college. As you can see children are really expensive, and a mother working on a low-wage job isnt enough to take care of a child finacially. Im not saying mothers who work can not provide for their children, because my mother is single parent who provides me with the neciaties that i need and ask for. But what im trying to say is if a mother needs a helping hand, then she can look to welfare as a secondary resource if she truly needs it.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In her article “Should Human Cloning Be Permitted?,” Patricia Baird (2000) argues against human cloning. Human cloning is a new type of reproduction, specifically asexual reproduction. With this new technology, people have a choice instead of just a chance to have a biological child. Human cloning is rejected by the majority of people from different countries because most are not scientists and don’t have a deep understanding of it. People can however, make judgements about complex issues. There are advantages for those that agree with cloning humans because of personal reasons, such as an infertile couple wanting a child of their own, lesbian or gay couples that want to make a family, or a couple wanting to save a dying child. She states that “[in] these scenarios, there are other options available to form a family” (Paragraph 4). For the cloned humans, she emphasizes on the possible physical and psychological harm that can occur to them. Patricia Baird questions the risks and dangers of cloning humans in the future because it not only impacts people that choose to use it but also for society and future generations. She describes cloning as creating a product, not a human and says that it will change the way we think of children that have been cloned. Cloning could become marketable, change laws and most importantly, people may be able to control human evolution. In her conclusion, she accentuates the significance of it being a collective decision on whether or not human cloning should be permitted.…

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is often a very controversial topic. Some people think it would be good while others are against it. I think cloning can be positive. Especially cloning food. While there are many who disagree there are a lot who agree. People are often misinformed about cloning. The pros outweigh the cons in most situations that have to do with cloning.There are many aspects of cloning that can be positive like cloning food and endangered species.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For these reasons, I am against human cloning. We can't let people make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. A lot of people worry that cloned people would not have full rights, since they are just copies. I find this reasoning absolutely ridiculous, since a person is a person despite their genetic source or of artificially…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Parents of clones might value children according to how much they look like themselves.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendation of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Washington: GPO, 1997.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many argue that cloning will benefit many people in various ways such as providing genetically related children for people who are infertile and allowing for stem-cell research. However, they choose to blatantly ignore the many risks associated cloning a human being. When man attempts to play God, it can never turn out well.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Speech: Cloning Humans

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human cloning involves many social, moral, and ethical controversies. I would like to state my position: no to human cloning, we have made enough mistakes, and I am personally not ready for such trials of my humanity. Human cloning is perverse, abnormal, unhealthy and unnecessary. It is an unjustifiable waste of human and material resources. I’m glad that the scientists have failed because the less attractive the idea may be to those who want to keep attempting such a thing. Human cloning is a controversial issue that is becoming one of the debatable subjects. I have studied websites to find out what people think of a designer human being. The opinions are divided. Some people are for human cloning as an emotional compensation for our lives' naturally ending in deaths; others are horrified with this unhealthy idea. Why would you want a replicate of someone that might possibly hate you? For example if you mother or father passes away, would you want to replace them with a copy that won’t have the exact feelings he or she felt towards you? Why would you want to replace a loved one in the first place? The idea of death shouldn’t be negative, it’s a way to put the mind and body to rest and at one point we all have to do it. I believe the cloning humans is morally incorrect and in the eyes of religious zealots they’ll will argue that God created man in his own image, and that he is the creator of it all. So why would man challenge God in creating something when he shouldn’t have the ability to do…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 5124 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The cloning of humans is now very close to reality, thanks to the historic scientific breakthrough of Dr. Ian Wilmut and his colleagues in the UK. This possibility is one of incredible potential benefit for all of us. Unfortunately the initial debate on this issue has been dominated by misleading, sensationalized accounts in the news media and negative emotional reactions derived from inaccurate science fiction. Much of the negativity about human cloning is based simply on the breathtaking novelty of the concept rather than on any real undesirable consequences. On balance, human cloning would have overwhelming advantages if regulated in a reasonable way. A comprehensive ban on human cloning by a misinformed public would be a sorry episode in human history. This essay will discuss both the advantages and the alleged negative consequences of human cloning.…

    • 5124 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Has human life become so unimportant that we need to make more of one person? It…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The informational piece of Pro-Human Cloning that is produced by Simon Smith describes that cloning should be legalized because it allows couples another alternative to conception so if parent(s) want to have children that have the same genetically related child whose DNA was similar to those of the parent. Moreover, it allows the curing and prevention of diseases, and it allows one to clone organs and cells to improve treatment of life threatening-illnesses.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics