You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The coined term “working towards the Fuhrer” helps shed light in understanding Hitler’s style of rule. “Working towards the Fuhrer” existed because of Hitler’s highly personalized style of rule. He rarely held cabinet meetings, met with cabinet members alone and disregarded customary governmental procedures. 2 Kershaw further explains the connection between “working towards the Fuhrer” and his rule, “Hitler’s sparse involvement in initiating domestic policy during the mid- and later 1930s and the disintegration of any centralized body for policy formulation means that were was wide scope for those able to exert pressure for action in areas broadly echoing the aims of nationalization of the masses.” 3 Due to Hitler’s disengagement from internal affairs, it opened the doors for party followers to carry out his aims to accomplish presumed party goals. Hitler’s style of rule that invited radical initiatives from below (“working towards the Fuhrer”, had substantial effects on both German society and the Nazi Regime during the 1930s.…
- 1028 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
During the early 20th century, both Germany and Russia underwent several governmental changes. In 1924, Joseph Stalin became the head of the Russian Communist Party, making him the sole leader of the entire Soviet Union. Although the party had been in power since 1922, the new leadership of Stalin was much different than that of Lenin’s, who led the Bolsheviks through the Russian Revolution and succeeded in establishing the Soviet Union. Stalin’s use of censorship to eliminate dissent allowed no opposition to him or the Communist Party (“Soviet Union”). Censorship was also employed in Germany shortly after the National Socialist German Workers’ Party won the election of 1933, making Adolf Hitler the Chancellor of Germany. Barnhill writes that in 1934, “Hitler…ordered the arrest and execution of Ernst Roehm and other of the Sturmabteilung 's top leaders” who could have been possible threats to the Nazi Party. Not only did both nations eliminate any possible opposition, but they also prevented it by having total control over all forms of media. The majority of the time, citizens of Germany and Russia only read, listened, and viewed what their governments wanted them to (Shoptaugh). Mass destruction of books and other printed material took place in both countries, and only films and…
- 1016 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“The new regime made no bones about using coercion in many forms against its declared enemies”2 However, enemies were not the only group that were at threat from Hitler and his coercion policies. Hitler, unlike previous German rulers, realised that in order to secure his position he must have a wall of protection against any possible uprising in the country if he was to remain as the Chancellor of Germany. The SS was created by Hitler and expanded “into a nationwide organisation to hunt down enemies of the state.”3 Here Historian, Boxer, highlights the idea that the SS were created to wipe out any possible opposition to Nazi ideology a prime example of this being The Night Of The Long Knives. This saw Hitler wipe out his previous task force in 1934, as he feared they might “compromise his plan to suppress workers’ rights in exchange for German industry making the country war ready.”4 Hitler showed here that he was prepared to use physical coercion tactics on almost anyone including men he had worked closely with as “Rohm and dozens of SA leaders were summarily executed.”5 Had Hitler not have used coercion in this example then it could have been possible that the “radical ambitions of the SA, who kept longing for a real social revolution.”6 May have had enough strength to remove Hitler from power and begin a revolution of their own; therefore in this case coercion proved to be important to him and his challenge of…
- 998 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“ the way to handle people is to treat them like chickens. Take away everything they have by plucking all their feathers and then throw them a few bread crumbs. Then they will follow you forever.” -Joseph Stalin. “ All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” - Napoleon the pig. The two harsh leaders undertook any rigid behavior they had to perform, in order to show others who were disobeying their orders that they were in charge. This made much of the public petrified of them. Joseph Stalin was known to be a very brutal leader and was put at fault for as many as 20 million deaths. Similar to Stalin was Napoleon who was also known for being a ruthless leader to the other animals on Animal Farm. Both Joseph Stalin and Napoleon…
- 186 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
These dictators were born outside of the countries they ruled. They also worked on killing anyone they disagreed with or they didn’t think were equal. I find it really scary how similar Hitler and Stalin are. These two dictators are different in the means of who they killed. Hitler was leaning more to killing slavs and jews.…
- 311 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
By researching Stalin we can see he had a very different personality. He started of life as the son of a poor family. He was strong willed and managed to weave his way to the top of the soviet government all because of his sneaky personality.…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
groups successfully molded young Russians, assuming progressively more political and propagandistic functions as the children aged. Stalin, just as Mussolini, was also instrumental in directing the role of women. Although initially aiming to liberate women from child rearing duties, Russia reversed this trend. Stalin took measures to strengthen social relationships and increase population at the expense of individual choice; abortions were outlawed, contraception was banned, sex education was forbidden, and divorce was harder to obtain.…
- 657 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the late 1920’s and 1930’s, Hitler and Stalin were leaders of Germany and the Soviet Union respectively. These states were under fascist and communist rule, which essentially were very similar. It was due to their full run of government that resulted in a dictatorial rule, also known as totalitarianism. Civilians’ lives were regulated in every aspect, some of which were their property and the military forces. Both parties used propaganda to bring awareness of their movement’s ideologies to their states in hopes that they would influence a large number of civilians, or if anything, all of them. The most comparable and recognizable aspect of fascism and communism was the fact that both Hitler and Stalin wanted a radical change for their states. In order to attain the transformation, violence was used on both their parts, which offended and anguished peoples lives. There are minor differences in relation to all of these examples; however, fascism and communism were essentially the same.…
- 1380 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Their stories begin at birth. Both Hitler and Stalin had difficult childhoods with abusive fathers. The father of young Adolf Hitler , an Austrian official, was known to be a harsh, strict man. Stalin’s father was an abusive drunk that perpetually beat his wife and children. The constant beatings in both of these men’s early life has lead many historians to wonder if the cynical outlook these men stems from the difficult childhoods they had. Both young men were good students at the religious schools…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hitler and Stalin were very different; Hitler killed millions of people due to their religious belief, Stalin killed millions by over working them and because they decided to go against the government, or were of a higher power. Now when it comes down to it in World War II the United States became allies with Stalin seeing as Hitler was the bigger threat. Stalin and Hitler both led by fear, Hitler was more vicious than Stalin, they both had their camps, but Stalin sent them to forced labor camps while Hitler sent them to concentration camps. Hitler did not put the Jews to work and work them to death, he saw them as flaws and useless human beings and they were just killed because of his personal beliefs. Although they both have their flaws and can be compared because they both did pretty terrible things to keep the power and social standings that they had Stalin was a better leader than Hitler. Hitler had German troops watching the streets and breaking into homes and forcing people to label themselves as Jews, while Stalin had citizens snoop on citizens, and did not have people label themselves as what they were. Historians have a hard time separating the two men and how they ran their countries (Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union: A Comparison and Contrast). Hitler as a leader lacked being rational, he was once asked how someone should progress in a party standing; his response was, that they simply had to seize that position. Stalin was less of a threat, he wanted to build up the industrial technologies and make the country better as a whole without singling any one specific type of person and taking that entire society of people out to gain his power. Stalin during World War II did not listen to anyone that warned him that they were going to be invaded by Germany and that Germany was going to break the pact that they made together, this was one of his biggest flaws. But with that being stated, he was not a shady leader, he…
- 959 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the twentieth century, there have been a lot of comparisons between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Notably, both of these dictators are known for their pitiless behaviour. As a result of an unparalleled level of authoritarianism, propaganda and endeavours to manipulate the citizens, these two dictators both possessed outright power. Each of these tyrants was compelled by innovative, debatable and exploitative ideologies about the supposed structure of the society and the world power. While Hitler and Stalin share some clear similarities, their personalities, the efficacy of governance and certain regimes were justifiably different. This essay with the use of dominant quantifiers of power such as style of leadership, propaganda, and the establishment of fundamental economic policies will argue that Hitler’s agenda was more successful. Stalin might have accomplished instilling a higher level of terror on the citizens; but it was also the cause of his inability to retain an efficient method of ruling. Finally, it would be concluded by linking a concrete analysis of Hitler’s dictatorship with scholars of World History to prove the main argument that Hitler’s embodied a more proficient and productive dictator rather than Stalin. It is necessary to note that this essay is not in its entirety stating that Hitler was infallible or a botch, but only assessing Hitler based on the different aspects of a successful leadership he implemented, during his supremacy in the Third Reich which led to the conclusion of him being a more successful dictator when compared to Stalin and his achievements.…
- 2915 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
During the period leading up to World War II, there were two men who were on opposing sides, the men were Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin. These men were each triumphant in their rise to power in their countries and they were very comparable in the ways that they succeeded. Their success was mostly attributed to their new ideas and their politics.<br><br>Although Hitler and Stalin hated each other, the two leaders were similar in many ways. Hitler and Stalin each rose to the highest position attainable in their respective countries, and there were three main reasons that they were able to do this. Both men were skilled users of propaganda, each was amoral, and they both had the ambition to make their countries powerful in the world. Since each was a skilled user of propaganda, they could use their words to twist and manipulate the minds of people into believing that what they were saying was the absolute truth. Using this power, they would get people to do anything for them, which proves their amorality. Since their countries were still trying to recover from World War I, they desired to restore the power back in to their countries. These three reasons will prove that Hitler and Stalin were similar in many ways.<br><br>The names Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are synonymous with the word propaganda. In order to understand how Hitler and Stalin used propaganda, an understanding of what the word means, is required. According to Merriam-Webster, "propaganda is the spreading of ideas to further or damage a cause; also the ideas or allegations spread for a purpose". Hitler and Stalin each used propaganda as their tool to further their ideas and help them gain the backing of the people in their countries. The form of propaganda that Hitler used, and was successful in using, was his words. Hitler made many speeches, but the one speech that was a famous one, was his final speech at his trial for treason. In this speech he gave his views and opinions on the events preceding…
- 1822 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Our world has had some powerful leaders who have developed their countries as well as having had major impact on the world. Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini and Adolph Hitler were three of these leaders. All these three leaders were the most powerful and influential leaders of their time. Each one of them made a significant impact on their country as well as on world’s history. Although they received similar success, all of them reached their success quite differently .Even though they assumed power legally, they where totalitarian leaders. They had positive and negative reflects during their rule.…
- 1829 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
How is evil measured? One of the most discussed topics of the century has been the contrast between the command of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Both leaders have had a massive impact not only in their country’s history, but also in society itself. Hitler and Stalin wanted to obtain the well-being of their country and people, but it is their attempt to achieve this victory is what truly made history. Their tactics ranged from concentration camps to mass murders and wars. Both have an endless list of crimes to their name, yet there are numerous factors to consider when determining who was worse.…
- 1086 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays