Preview

Summary of St.Thomas Aquinas' Treastie on Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary of St.Thomas Aquinas' Treastie on Law
Thomas Aquinas, Treatise on Law

Summary of Work:

Aquinas's political and legal theory is important for three reasons. First, it reasserts the value of politics by drawing on Aristotle to argue that politics and political life are morally positive activities that are in accordance with the intention of God for man. Second, it combines traditional hierarchical and feudal views of the structure of society and politics with emerging community-oriented and incipiently egalitarian views of the proper ordering of society. Third, it develops an integrated and logically coherent theory of natural law that continues to be an important source of legal, political, and moral norms.

Main Point of Section:

In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”

Key Ideas:

1. Source of the law is God. The root of obligation is in the divine conception of the order proper to the universe. Human Law, to be just and morally obligating, must therefore be rooted in Divine Law. People cannot originate the law themselves. Aquinas rejects Divine Right theory because it contributes a divine quality to political authority. No authority, not even the sovereign, can impose an obligation on the citizen where it is not already latent in the nature of things.

2. Essence of Law: An ordinance of reason for the common good made by one who has care for the community and is promulgated. (90.4)

3. Kinds of Law: A hierarchical typology of laws. * But the eternal, natural, and human laws are all one rule progressively specified.
a) Eternal: The rational governance of everything on the part of God as ruler of the universe (91.1). Divine Providence.
b) Natural: The participation in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economics Quiz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the following is not an example of St. Thomas Aquinas’ requirements for a law to be just?…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canadian Law Categories

    • 4297 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The Law: a command of the sovereign, each with its own set of rules from different sources and aims.…

    • 4297 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The view of a timeless God that Aquinas’ presents is more akin to how I see God. He is sees all at once and knows the path I should take; however, I have the choice to walk which path. I also have the choice to use my personal characteristics and individual traits for good. God wills for it to be so, contingent on my choice. I think Aquinas’ argues this…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    EssayThief123

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However it can be argued that even before Aquinas developed Natural Law; it was a pretty stable concept which could be followed. As previously mentioned that we don’t truly know what good is, following our reason, as Aristotle said, would become much easier. This is because what we perceive to be good is personal to the individual and…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reducing Suarez's position on law and obligation to mere voluntarism fails to do him justice. The content of the natural law is something that is created by nature itself, a position that voluntarists of the time would surely disagree with. I then go to show that, under the blame model, sinful acts are blameworthy and thus obligatory. I will first make the claim that this is more philosophically consistent than making a distinction between obligation and duty (as Irwin does). I will conclude by stating that Suarez's system can still be rendered comprehensible without this distinction.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Combining natural-law doctrines with the theory of royal absolutism, fourteenth century philosopher Bartolus of Sassoferrato believed that the ruler should not be bound to the laws of the government, but still should obey them whenever possible. In agreement with Bartolus, another fourteenth century philosopher, Lucas de Penna advocated that the ruler is only accountable to divine authority, being responsible to God alone, not the people. Further de Penna believed that law is the articulation of the ethical virtue of justice and reason is the foundation for that law. Thereby debasing the importance of the king's obedience to established law.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    explicitly noted in his writings, that he was influenced by the work of 13th century philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas. King’s functional definition of natural law was taken from Aquinas’ seminal and most known work, “Summa Theologica”. King agrees with St. Thomas Aquinas’ key precepts of natural law that good should be promoted and carried out, while evil must be identified and avoided. It was King’s view that he had not broken a moral or legal law. King strongly believed in Aquinas teachings, stating that “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law”. King’s arguments in his letter accurately reflect Aquinas’ philosophy on natural…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Through Aristotle’s work in Politics, he articulates several fundamental aspects of political philosophy that has been greatly influential. Two specific philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas, evaluate Aristotle’s perspective of the political nature in relation to mankind. Thomas Aquinas uses Aristotle’s principles as a foundation for his reasoning in writing “On Law, Morality, and Politics.” He modifies Aristotle argument by contributing the religious sphere into the fundamental principles of his political teachings. Thomas Hobbes, on the contrary, is a lot more critical of Aristotle and attacks a lot of his political principles in “The Leviathan.” Hobbes perceives individuals as corrupt, untrustworthy and selfishly motivated, without…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In all of these, God is the central truth. Aquinas believes that law was given to us by God’s divine existence, and as such is the eternal law. According to Aquinas, because God is inherently good, any laws and their subsequent punishments that are based on eternal law are considered virtuous and good as they are a means to make man moral and true. Laws based on tyranny cannot be considered true laws because their basis is personal rather than divine and therefore they do not serve God and do not contribute to the greater good.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanities Final

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Who Studied Roman Laws ? Who said … We must build a Republic based on virtue? – montesquiee – spirit of laws…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That is a perfect example of Karma. Question 3: Aquinas ties his natural law ethic to a comprehensive religious theology. However, Aristotle argued that a belief in God is not necessary for the existence of natural law. Which point of view do you agree with?…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ← Definition of law: Law, in its generic sense, is a body of rules of action or conduct prescribed by controlling authority, and having binding legal force. That which must be obeyed and followed by citizens subject to sanctions or legal consequences is a law.…

    • 10003 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays