Preview

Supreme Command Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1025 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Command Analysis
The relationship between military and political leaders has always been complicated, especially during war times. In the Supreme Command, Eliot Cohen examines four historical portraits: Lincoln, Clemenceau, Churchill and Ben-Gurion, to proof through a practical example, his argument that, despite their military experiences, statesmen should not turn their wars over to their generals. Cohen tried to sell his product of civil-military relations based on the concept that the civilian authority should intervene at the tactical and operational level in order to achieve success in war. In this paper, I will define the general argument of Supreme Command then I will explain how Cohen account of civil-military relations to Lincoln during the American …show more content…
Significant that, on 1 April 1861 he ordered the commander in chief Winfield Scott to provide daily reports, only a few weeks after taking office. Likewise, within a week of writing a letter to Ulysses S. Grant, disclaiming any wish to know Grant’s plans, he sent a special emissary to report back regularly and on a daily basis in some cases on what Grant’s doing, and later on by sending his assistant secretary of war, Charles Dana, as a personal observer of the Union armies in the field. Even his relation with his generals was under supervision. Lincoln was an abler manager of man, he had the art of making use of able, but flawed subordinates who could not abide one another. For instance, through his letter to the blustering General Joseph Hooker in 26 January 1863, he showed Hook that the President saw his faults, no less than his virtues. Thus, Hook obeyed Lincoln despite his feuds with other …show more content…
He served as minister of munitions and later secretary of state for war. Perhaps his four-volume book “the world crisis” was the clearest example of his passion for war. However, Churchill interference in the military had another taste. Instead of writing letters to his officers as Lincoln did, he prone to calling his captains at all hours of the night, and asked for meetings with specialists and high ranked officers to study a case in order to win the war challenges. A good example was on 21 June 1940, when he met twenty-eight-year-old London scientist, along with the highest chain of command in the army and the air force, to discuss the possibility that the Germans had developed a means of all-weather precision navigation to drop bombs through cloud
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Military Discourse Community Analysis
    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Military Discourse Community Analysis

    Throughout American history, our military has been made up of very diverse people. From rich to poor, strong to weak, with all sorts of race and religions, we see this organization that fights and wins wars. They hold the frontlines, protecting this country, and can arguably be seen as the muscle of the United States. The people in the military are also seen as heroes, murderers and many things, but with politics and opinions set aside, I want to take this time to analyze the military with a literary viewpoint. I plan to break down the logistics of military communication, and show how they form a discourse community.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are Lincolns Jefferson's Qualities
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are Lincolns Jefferson's Qualities

    Lincoln is willing to accept the risk of Hooker trying to set himself up as dictator because Lincoln recognized Hooker's skill as a general. Up to this point, Lincoln had dealt with so many other contentious or outright incompetent military commanders that Hooker's ambition was an acceptable flaw. From McClellan's tendency to freeze and avoid the offensive, as well as his belief in a "limited war" to Burnsides' massive failure at Antietam to Bragg's indecisiveness, Lincoln was in desperate need of a reliable general to lead the army and change the course of the war. The Confederacy had the leadership of the legendary Robert E. Lee, who I don't believe even Grant could compare to. Lincoln saw that Hooker had all the qualities of an exceptional…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Multifaceted Factors Of Major Military Campaigns In World War I
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Three Multifaceted Factors Of Major Military Campaigns In World War I

    Throughout World War I, an exclusive and unmatched civil-military association was made. The U.S. regime and its army worked carefully with noncombatant leaders to convey an associated conquest in Europe. Enlistment was convoluted by America’s multiplicity which replicated dominant class, cultural, ethnic, and philosophical dissimilarities. Marshaling public view stimulated a super partisan and patriotic passion that intensified into mass frenzy and eventually commanded full conventionality. Demobilization exertions comprised finding occupations for militaries – a sweat the War Section commenced out of a sensation of accountability and panic of intruding militancy. This article examines three multifaceted concerns in America’s World War I civilian-army account: mobilization, marshaling public outlook, and dismissal.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Did Lincoln Administration Prevent European Intervention
    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Did Lincoln Administration Prevent European Intervention

    The purpose of the source was to focus on five distinct events that help to define Lincoln’s approach to foreign affairs, as well as how his administration were able to successfully prevent European intervention. Lincoln is not primarily viewed as a great foreign policy maker, due to him not having any personal relations in Europe. Furthermore, it is important to this investigation because it emphasizes the strategies used during the growing information age and gives clear documented accounts to European responses to these events. Peraino is well educated in foreign policy, which values his ability to understand and enhance Lincoln’s tactics and the effects it had on the European working-class. However, a possible limitation of the source is that he is a news journalist, which credits him to possibly manipulate specific instances to make one side seem more upholding than another. Another limitation is that there is no academic information regarding his background besides him graduating college and being a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. This limits his personal education towards being a credited historian, by using other sources and historians in his…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Failure In Generalship Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Failure In Generalship Analysis

    In “A Failure in Generalship”, LTC Paul Yingling assigns blame for the failure of the military in the Vietnam War and the dire and deteriorating situation in Iraq at the beginning of 2007, placing it on America’s generals, then and now. Though fearless in its attempt, the essay presents a weak academic argument to back up this claim due to a string of fallacies, statements and arguments based on false or invalid inference. Most notable in his essay is “hasty generalization”, “missing the point”, and the “false dichotomy”. The initial fallacy that undermines the argument is that of “hasty generalization”. A “hasty generalization” is a broad sweeping statement placed on a group of people without a sufficient…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is George Washington's Early Examples Of Forbearance
    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is George Washington's Early Examples Of Forbearance

    Following George Washington’s early example of forbearance, United States military leaders between the Revolutionary and Civil Wars honored the spirit of the Constitution by deferring to civilian leaders. However, this deference did not preclude pursuing personal or institutional political goals by courting politicians and playing branches of government against each other. Although military leaders sought to informally influence political decisions regarding force structure, promotions, and budgets, they did not seek to usurp power or take control when decisions unfavorable affected institutional interests. This pattern of civil-military relations became the norm, even when wartime conditions add additional complexity to the relationship.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Essay
    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages

    APUSH Essay

    Abraham Lincoln, a man renowned for his involvement in the civil war and the reconstruction that followed the war’s lambasted segregation of brotherly blood, held an ideology regarding reconstruction that he wished to be upheld nationally. Lincoln’s bias, with its roots in the core of early humanistic values and union preservation, called for the national synthesis of the North and the South in the presence of benevolent and humanitarian efforts that would strive to “bind up the nation’s wounds.” However, regardless of Lincoln’s idealistic view of reconstruction, the events that followed his assassination, whether they were of political or social affiliation, generally served to contradict Lincoln’s peaceful philosophy on a grand scale.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Role in the Battle of New Orleans
    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Role in the Battle of New Orleans

    As a senior commanding officer in the United States army, Andrew Jackson was instrumental at defending the nation’s independence against British colonialism. He is credited for having been one of the most distinguished veteran’s of the American Revolution, at one point even being a prisoner of war. Of all his major achievements at the political and military fronts, it was his participation in the Anglo-American War of 1812 that propelled him into nationwide fame and recognition. According to Robert Remini (11) in his book “The Battle of New Orleans”, during the war Jackson exuded nothing short of fierceness and strength, coupled with confidence at the helm of the military.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War Awakening Summary
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Civil War Awakening Summary

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil-Military Relations In Elliot Cohen's Supreme Command
    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil-Military Relations In Elliot Cohen's Supreme Command

    There is one truth in war…good men will die, sent to the front by their senior civilian and military leadership. Throughout the short history of the United States, many published works put forth a counter position to Huntington’s The Soldier and the State. All attempt to find the “right” answer and balance to the civil-military relationship; with each essay, it seems a new conflict is on the horizon and the question is more difficult to answer. In Elliot Cohen’s book, Supreme Command, he examines the tension between these two kinds of leadership, civil and military. Here, we will examine two accounts of civil-military relationships: the Civil War and Vietnam War, and determine which case best support Cohen’s general argument in his book.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Spychology
    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Spychology

    At the time in history, economic and moral differences led to dispute between the North and the South. Even though, they had some business and organization, anyways, they had had disagreed over tariffs, slavery, and western lands, eventually these dispute led to The Civil War. On the time of history, we had many great soldiers and military leaders, such as, William Wheeler and Charles Colcock Jones Jr., William Wheeler, Captain of New York’s Thirteenth Artillery. At early age he was interested on literature and read books. He was a very educated in law, came from a wealthy family. He was from the Union. He fought in many important battles, as a matter of fact; it made the difference at the victory on The Civil War. Also, always look forward to improve the life of the soldiers. For example, he always looks the way to though the soldier to read. The contribution to the Civil War was always his main factor on life. On time when he came from a trip from home, he wrote to his mom “a quiet feeling of satisfaction and contentment, happiness in being back at my work again.” His abolitions views helped the election of Abraham Lincoln. He knew the military was his life, and also he will die on it. On the other hand, Charles Colcock Jones Jr. lieutenant colonel of the Georgia Artillery was a dedicated soldier of the Confederacy. At the same way like Wheeler, Colcock wrote letters whit details that the life on The Civil War, against the enemy. He also, described on his letters scenes in which the lives of blacks and whites mingled in common sentiment. He was a favor of slavery. In his mind, master and slaves in Georgia constituted a genuine community. He also, was proud to be on the military. Jones wrote a letter to his parent saying “he would gladly give his life in support of southern honor, nationality, and principles.” On the author point of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jellicoe Regarding The Yorkshire Raid Analysis
    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jellicoe Regarding The Yorkshire Raid Analysis

    Churchill’s justification for not following the advice of Jellicoe regarding the Yorkshire Raids is unjustified. Churchill argues that because the information obtained by Room 40, that the Admiralty was basing their decision on, was untested and highly speculative there was no real need to take the information seriously. Any information obtained by Room 40 is going to be untested and highly speculative until put to the test. The purpose of Room 40 is to obtain information regarding the German Naval movements during the war and if the British Admiralty are not going to take the information seriously then there is no point in obtaining the information at all. Furthermore, Churchill argues that the risks of accident, submarines and mines faced…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill's Role in Ww2
    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Winston Churchill's Role in Ww2

    Churchill was important to Britain in World War 2 for many different reasons, mainly because he was just such a good leader and because of the choices he made whilst in power. One of the main reasons was that he gave the British public belief, belief that they would win the war and by making optimistic speeches he inspired them and told them what they needed to hear. But as well as being this inspirational figure he was also quite harsh. He basically harassed the military commanders in the Middle East and North Africa for action and he gave them hell when they did not achieve the results he wanted. Field Marshall Alan Brooke spent most of the war fighting Churchill, although they actually got on really well! It was his job to ensure that none of Churchill’s ideas ‘saw the light of day’ and he tried to shield the military from him.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    The Military's Role and the Effects in a Civilian Supremacy, Civilian Control, and Military Regime
    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The Military's Role and the Effects in a Civilian Supremacy, Civilian Control, and Military Regime

    The Military’s Role and the Effects in A Civilian Supremacy, Civilian Control, and Military Regime…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln Reaction Paper
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lincoln Reaction Paper

    Before Lincoln reached the national capital, Jefferson Davis was already inaugurated as President of the Confederate States of America. Civil War was close to breaking out following the event of Fort Sumter. Since congress was not in session, Lincoln had to take immediate action, calling up militia and compiling money to be spent; Lincoln just took the necessary actions in a time of emergency. He was "commander-in-chief," which granted him some authority; on top of that the limits of execute war power were not clearly defined, so Lincoln cannot take full blame. He undoubtedly acted thinking of the consequences; this was the best path to take.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics