Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The United States After the War of 1812

Good Essays
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The United States After the War of 1812
After the war of 1812, America underwent some changes as a nation. In comparison to the country prior to the war, the United States initially appeared to be more united in the sense that only one party ruled, but in reality, this only increased factions within the government due to sectionalism and the court. Because the United States emerged as a one party nation after the War of 1812, members of past parties, such as the Federalists, felt the need to join with the Jeffersonians to maintain their competitiveness in the government. Evidently, this meant that many members within the Jeffersonian party began to hold differing political viewpoints. Thus, what the Jeffersonians originally represented became irrelevant and the true values of the party were obliterated. Basically, the party was meaningless and political unity was only superficial. For instance, Henery Clay was considered a Jeffersonian during this time, but he was in favor of building roads with the use of tax dollars, which was not a traditional Jeffersonian belief.
Where politicians came from also had a huge influence on their views. Those from the South favored the use of slaves while those from the North opposed it. When it came to deciding whether incoming states would be free or slave states, conflict arose. The Southern states were concerned that if another free state was added, that their candidates would be more likely to lose elections, and vice versa. Finally, the Missouri compromise was brought about which physically drew a line through the country at 36 30. All states above would be free, and all below would be slave states. Cleary, this led to a severe case of sectionalism; the country was divided amongst slave states and free states. With such sectional differences, unity was impossible, despite the fact that only Jeffersonians existed.
Another factor which effected the nation’s unity was the court. Since John Adams appointed “midnight judges” to the Supreme Court during the final hours of his presidency, Federalist influence still lingered throughout the court, specifically with John Marshall. Marshall was certainly not a Jeffersonian as he constantly sought to strengthen the court and the Federal government with his rulings. During the case of Marbury vs. Madison, he successfully strengthened the court by stating that the final say of what is constitutional belongs to the court. This began the practice of judicial review. In the case of McCulloch vs. Maryland, Madison limited state power forbidding states from overriding constitutional law. Many a Jeffersonian opposed his rulings as they believed that power should lie within the states and that the Federal government should not have too much strength. Obviously, Marshall’s court led to division after the war of 1812.
However, the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans were now the only political party alone is a good basis to how the country was more united after the War of 1812. Unity like this was unheard of in the United States prior to this time. For the first time, there appeared to be no political factions, causing the Era of Good Feelings. A sense of nationalism was adopted by Americans as well and unity certainly seemed to be present.
Although the country became unified in many trivial ways after the War of 1812, for the most part, the United States actually became more divided. Yes, single party rule existed, but this did not mean that all within the party were truly loyal to the ways of Jefferson, but were merely conforming to stay in the running for future elections. Because of this, sectionalism emerged and Marshall’s court provided further political detachment, making the United States a very divided nation after the War of 1812.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the bustling port cities of the early American eastern seaboard, Baltimore was the only one that was firmly in the Democratic-Republican camp at the onset of the War of 1812. The young and dynamic boomtown stood antithetical to the aged, ordered, and settled civilization of southern Maryland whose economy was founded in the eighteenth century on the backs of African slaves and tobacco production; a crop which remained during the grain transition of northern Maryland and southern Pennsylvania farmland at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Baltimore, since 1798, had been a Democratic-Republican bastion and, starting in 1801, the Maryland state government soon followed. Though the Federalists remained powerful in southern Maryland and on the Eastern Shore, there were less Federalist representatives in the state legislature as compared to the populous Democratic-Republican districts. A…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Change occurs in every time period. Today Americans work and communicate faster through home computers and cell phones than they did thirty years earlier. Change also occurred early in the nineteenth century. After General Andrew Jackson led the United States victory at New Orleans, nationalism increased and Americans looked forward with confidence to a future filled with changes. They would not be disappointed. The years after the War of 1812 produced great economic and political changes.…

    • 941 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Missouri Compromise reflected regional differences toward slavery in that the North and South had opposite opinions about the issue. The North was against using slaves while the South was for it. The 36-30 latitude line essentially divided the country between North and South, as the area above the line prohibited slavery, which they were fine with anyways as the North didn’t use and was against using slaves. The area below the line and Missouri were allowed to use slaves, which made sense as the area below the line was the South, who actually used the slaves and didn’t want to end the use of the slave system. This 36-30 latitude line was a physical reflection of the differing viewpoints on slavery between the North and the South, as it reflected the ideals of the North and…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Revolutionary war, America had to create a new government. George Washington accomplished many things and solved even more problems. Then President Jefferson and Madison came into their terms’ and run rolled all of his work. President Washington achieved four main goals during his two terms; avoiding a war, establishing a economy, stopped British from aiding Native Americans and creating a federal government. In the time of Jefferson’s and Madison’s terms’ they concluded somethings, but they were of no help for anyone but themselves, and sometimes not even themselves. Actually, they started more problems than what they solved through starting a new government, the Louisiana Purchase, and the War of 1812.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winning the War of 1812 against Britain, brought a sense of unity and peace to Americans. The national economy was flourishing. As a result of the war Americans experienced a “new surge of patriotic nationalism…” This period was known as the “Era of Good Feelings.”…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founders hoped to avoid factions in the government which was the equivalent of the political parties which came into being. The founding fathers goal would become unachievable during George Washington’s presidency which would mark the beginning of the two party systems. This system began with Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, was the Secretary of the Treasury and the antifederalists who became known as the democratic republicans led by Jefferson. Political parties were very important in the evolution of the way the united states governed itself due to the fact that people with shared economic and cultural goals joined together to influence policy decisions in America. These parties were able to back candidates for certain positions. Once…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Of 1812 Dbq Outline

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The war of 1812 took place in America and Canada. The Americans fought with the British and natives of the land. When the US and congress declared war on Great Britain, they may not have realized that their success seemed to be doomed to begin with. There was strong lack of support from American citizens to go to war, this was because of several reasons. Divided forces from different states caused problems and didn’t want to cooperate or complete certain tasks. Ports were not being allowed for war usage because citizens didn’t feel the need to go to war. There was a huge national debt to pay off from the previous war with Britain, and finally because of political differences. This all ties in with he lack of support from citizens not wanting…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1820, congress passed a law called the “Missouri Compromise”. This law stated: any state below the border of Missouri that wanted to join the Union would be a slave state, and any state above the Missouri border would be a free state. The law also allowed anyone to cross either side of the border to capture African Americans and sell them back into slavery. When the Missouri Compromise was passed,there were three states above the border that were already slave states, and the law allowed those states to keep slavery. There were several reasons why the Missouri Compromise gave the South an advantage over the North.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slavery Sectional Issue

    • 2426 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The compromise stated that above the 36’30’ parallel was a free state and anything below it would be a slave state (Silverman). The Missouri Compromise only created more division of ideas between the North and the South. Northerners did not believe that geography should dictate whether slavery was legal, whereas the south believed that there should still be slavery all over the United States. Although this 36’30 compromise was first agreed on by both the North and South, the South had other plans about territory during this…

    • 2426 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over time, most took for granted that their prosperity, even their way of life, was inseparable from African slavery” (NPS). The regional divisions caused by the difference in economies were furthered deepened by the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state in order to keep the balance of power of the Senate. It also established a line so that any state north of the line would be a free state and any state south of the line would be a slave state. The compromise created a line dividing the North and the South, which increased tensions among the two sides as it created a clear division showing which side supported slavery and which side opposed…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Election of 1800

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Edward J. Larson analyzes the pivotal presidential election, sometimes referred to as a revolution, of 1800 that established two disparate political parties, challenged the United States Constitution, and threatened the nation’s unity. Because this was the first time in American history that partisan campaigning was distinctly apparent, it was a significant piece of the election of 1800. When establishing the opposing campaigns of 1800, the article states, “…divided Americans into two distinct partisan camps: the Federalist of President John Adams and Alexander Hamilton –ideological ancestors of modern Republicans- versus the Republicans, or the future Democrats.” Here it is not only giving information on the situation of the fourth presidential election, but the situation that set the precedent for presidential elections to come. Even “207 years later”, as Larson writes, the political breach on policies and ideas shapes the government of the United States. The election of 1800 included the race between the following candidates: Thomas Jefferson, Aaron Burr, Alexander Hamilton and Charles Pinckney. After all the votes were calculated “Jefferson and Burr had 73 votes each.” The election ended in a tie between two members of the same party. As an immediate result of the election’s initial outcome, the Constitution was put to the test. The voting process in place by the Constitution showed its faults with the changing bipartisan mentality of America. This newly discovered weakness “led to the adoption of the 12th Amendment to the US Constitution.” This amendment prevented a repeat of the election of 1800 by making voting for president and vice president separate. Never again could tie be caused by equal voting by a party. Here the government adapted to the changing fundamentals of the partisan politics of the United States; it shows concern for the good people. In referring to the election of 1800 Larson concludes by making the claim…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Era Of Good Feelings

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The changing nation reflected a growing sense of national pride in the United States during the Era of Good Feelings when United States citizens had a gleaming sense of nationalism and didn’t really care what the government did, The Age of Jackson when lower class citizens were just happy to have a president that wasn’t from a rich family. Lastly, State’s rights and the Economy not only brought people together due to the states gaining power but it also drew citizens further apart because not everyone liked the idea of a national bank. In the United States after the War of 1812, everyone had a large sense of nationalism because the British were defeated again. The United States was finally being seen as a threat or an actual country and the…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays