Preview

Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan Summary
Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan
A book called Leviathan (1660), written by Thomas Hobbes, in argues that all social peace and unity is and can be achieved through the use of a sovereign power. Hobbes begins the Leviathan with his theories on man. He believes men are a basic creature and relativity simple. They are nothing but creatures that react to their surroundings, which leads to their wants and desires. Because the world's environment is ever changing so is man. All of these different desires floating around puts man in an unending warring state. In this never ending violent state men are reduced to living in constant fear and in a state of endless anxiety. Men only think for their own lives because of this, and Hobbes solution is to create a state that has a main goal of protecting the ever nervous creatures. The second part of the book is then brought into play; man's duties to this government that is trying to protect them. In the eyes of Hobbes, the most efficient form of government is a monarchy because is a single power, strong enough to save man from outside invaders and from themselves. The subjects of such a government have a complete and total duty to their government. Of course there is always the option to leave if one does not like the ideals however, this places man back in the state of constant warring and always defending one's self. Next, Hobbes ponders the question of obedience to divine and sovereign authority. He concludes that there is no reason for the two to clash. But, because of man's belief that god is within human reach, the two conflict. According to Leviathan, because God is supernatural and unreachable, man has no claim to religious authority, leaving only worldly authorities to answer to such as the law. Finally, The final chapter of Leviathan describes a setting for man when they do not follow the rules and ideals set forth for them. In this life, there is an endless manipulation of man by others and they cycle continues. Without man

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After his experience in World War 2 William Golding had the idea for his novel The Lord of the Flies, within said novel he included the philosophies of several men. William Golding was aware of the enlightenment philosophers when he wrote The Lord of the Flies, because Ralph had created a legitimate government, the rights of the people were put in danger once his social contract was broken, and once the boy's are given freedom they were corrupted.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    but such a system would have to take for granted Hobbes’ values and rationality—it would not work ‘right out of the box’ as deontology or utilitarianism does; more on this later.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout human history, the issue of power has been the source of countless wars and violence, and so has it sparked inspiration in many philosophers to develop potentially better systems of government. The Age of Enlightenment saw many philosophers sprout with new ideas on forms of government to replace or refine the archaic norm of absolute monarchy; one such controversial thinker was Thomas Hobbes. In his widely-recognized book, The Leviathan, he claimed that, because human beings are naturally selfish and evil, one must cede his or her rights to the absolute monarch so that peace can be established and maintained. However, if all human beings are cruel, then monarchs are not any different from the evil of those he rules. In William Golding’s 1954 novel The Lord of the Flies, Golding reflects Hobbes’ ideas about human nature as he depicts the governing of a cluster of stranded boys on an island, from the lack of cohesion of Ralph’s attempt to rationally lead them back to civilization, to Jack’s manipulation of the children into savagery. William Golding thus qualifies Thomas Hobbes’ position, supporting that humans are naturally selfish and evil but refuting his claim that an absolute ruler would make “wise” decisions through his illustration of Jack’s greed for power, hostile acts to Ralph and Piggy, and manipulation of his followers.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes.
Thomas Hobbes. (1588-1679). ‘Born premature when mother heard of oncoming Armada.’ At 40, he took Euclid’s geometry as starting point to make mechanical model of universe (man and society). Mechanism (based on motion) was to greatly influence thinking over next few centuries. Witness to upheaval of civil war in England in 1640s. Fled to France. 1651. Publishes "Leviathan.”Hobbes sees state of nature sans government as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Promulgates absolute monarch thesis. Says people (wholly selfish) should escape chaos of everyday life, give up their freedom to ruler who guarantees peace and order. In his state Hobbes saw ruler as absolute with men having no right to rebel since this would break the social contract and be illogical.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes begins Leviathan with Book 1: Of Man, in which he builds, layer by layer, a foundation for his eventual argument that the "natural condition" of man, or one without sovereign control, is one of continuous war, violence, death, and fear.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story Lord of the Flies by William Golding, there are quotes in the story that help the reader understand what events are happening. Roger exemplifies all the negative human characteristics discussed by Thomas Hobbes. When Roger was introduced to the story, he appeared to be someone who would most likely be picked to be a leader, or “chief”. Thomas Hobbes mainly believed that “men cannot know good and evil, and in consequence can only live in peace together by subjection to the absolute power of a common master, and therefore there can be no peace between kings”. A great of example of Ralph is when Jack was introduced. There was a conflict because Jack also appeared to be a great representation of a leader. Although both characters compromised , there was still conflicts because two ‘testosterone-fueled’ children might not always have the skills to run a group together. “Ralph was annoyed and, for the moment, defeated. He felt himself facing something ungraspable. The eyes that looked so intently at him were without humor” (37).…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A plane full of adolescent boys crashes on a stranded island, leaving them alone and trapped, are they prone to civilization, or will their age cause disputes and show the true meaning of learning life through experience? Through the boys’ peril, their inhumanity to each other is caused from their want for power, their victimization, and their need to survive on a pig-inhabited island. Thomas Hobbes, an avid supporter of human rights, is definitely a great choice among others, for an appearance in the end of Lord of the Flies. Because of his beliefs, he could have potentially changed the outcome for some of the boys though words of wisdom. In life, people learn and grow during experiences with others, and change is something that happens because of actions and…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argues that the social contract between man and government allows man to exit the state of nature and enter the state of law. Each man comprises the body of the Leviathan, with only the head…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes' and Locke's writings center on the definition of the "state of nature" and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and "the state of nature", a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes' Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler's powers. The understanding of the state of nature is essential to both theorists' discussions. For Hobbes, the state of nature is equivalent to a state of war. Locke's description of the state of nature is more complex: initially the state of nature is one of "peace, goodwill, mutual assistance and preservation". Transgressions against the law of nature, or reason which "teaches mankind that all being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty and possessions," are but few. The state of nature, according to Locke's Treatise, consists of the society of man, distinct from political society, live together without any superior authority to restrict and judge their actions. It is when man begins to acquire property that the state of nature becomes somewhat less peaceful. At an undetermined point in the history of man, a people, while still in the state of nature, allowed one person to become their leader and judge over controversies. This was first the patriarch of a…

    • 3013 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In Leviathan (1651) by Thomas Hobbes, he assumes that men are all equal and selfish, and such selfish desires drives men into a state…

    • 3199 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, there are numerous references to the emotion of fear in human nature and it’s effects as one of the defining principles of human interaction. It helps set up a foundation of sorts for some of the main points of Hobbes’ liberal view on the governing body of society and a basis for the “Social Contract Theory”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hobbes represents his theory of the “perfect” government by the story of Leviathan in the book of Job found in the Christian Bible. He sees the sovereign ruler would be as strong as the biblical Leviathan. Hobbes believes that the people would turn to the guidance…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays