Preview

To What Extent Did the Development of the Cold War Influence Stalin’s Policies Inside the Ussr?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1599 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Did the Development of the Cold War Influence Stalin’s Policies Inside the Ussr?
To what extent did the development of the Cold War influence Stalin’s policies inside the USSR?

Up until 1945 the tensions between the USSR and the USA had been covered by the fact that both sides were trying to fight against Hitler and therefore relations up until the war had been relaxed. However this changed after 1945 the victory against Germany brought them international superpower status giving them more control and influence over many countries especially in Eastern Europe. As a result Stalin changed and adapted policies accordingly to increase competition with the USA; both countries were fearful of each other hence why Stalin concentrated on things such as industry and ignoring agricultural production for example. I will explain what and why the cold war influenced Stalin’s policies inside the USSR and come to a conclusion.

My first point is that Stalin focused his efforts even more on the development of industry than ever before. The reason why Stalin did this was to rival the USA’s superpower status and therefore they focused on quantitative rather than the qualitative side of industry. Stalin wasn’t worried if the products they produced were any good as long as they met the 5 year plan targets then he believed he could compete with the USA. This showed as according to the statistics every planned target in 1950 was apparently met e.g. the coal target was 250 million tons which they surpassed and reached 261 million tons. Even the figures may have been exaggerated it is clear that the Stalinist approach had worked in terms of recovering from the war as well making significant progress in terms of producing goods.

My next point is again to do with industrial production, but more specifically how they focused on heavy industry and capital goods in order to help with defence and the production of nuclear weapons. In 1950 industrial production was almost up by 75% compared to 1940. The most significant increases were in the production of capital goods

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was it the acts of Truman and Churchill rather than that of Stalin that brought the cold war to a start?…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several methods Stalin had introduced to obtain control over the Soviet Union by directing individual policies and techniques into a particular group.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the time of Stalin’s death in 1953?…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Stalin’s rule mar the key turning point in Russia’s political development 1856-1953?…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many ways, Stalins policies in the 1920s differed massively from Marxist theories. For example, when Stalin had invaded Georgia, he had gone against the Marxist idea of internationalism in favour of invading Georgia and taking of the republic for the interests of Russian Nationalism.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cold war was due to major changes in the balance of global power created by the second world. The west had always viewed Stalin with distrust and suspicion, Stalin’s past history of teaming up with the Nazis helped determine his credibility issues in the USA. Stalin believed that America purposely stalled deployment of its troops to Russia just so the Nazis would do severe damage and kill many Russian soldiers. When Germany was defeated in 1944 the alliance of Russian and the USA also broke apart. With the Nazis rule of over Europe ended many wondered who would take control over the respective territories leaving the USSR as the front runner. Through the Russians re distribution of the war torn land throughout Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Romania, and Albania this enabled the USSR to maintain military control throughout these countries. Right after the war communist parties sprouted up in all of these countries that Russia had control over. By 1948 most of Eastern Europe had Communist governments; this was very alarming to the United States. President Truman opposed the Soviets wide spread military and economic influence over Easter Europe. Mr. Truman believed that Stalin was using taking advantage of the war torn countries and using unjustified influences to control their countries. The United States of America was afraid that eventually Stalin’s far reaching political and military influence would eventually percolate westward than into Across the Atlantic into America.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin’s policy in Eastern Europe can be construed to seem very defensive; however arguments can be made to suggest that there were alternative motives to his desire to expand Soviet influence in the Eastern nations. The legitimacy towards a defensive claim is due to the critical nature of the Nazi invasion of Russia during the Second World War, which was through countries such as Poland and Czechoslovakia. Therefore Stalin’s fear of further invasion, especially in a nuclear world as proved by the Americans in Japan, allows his policy to be justified. This is only to a certain extent though because there were instances where some might argue that Stalin’s policy took a much more aggressive turn towards the expansion of Communism. Despite these two radically different attitudes regarding Soviet policy, action and response of the USA and Soviet Union suggest a misunderstanding of each other’s aims for the future of Europe, thus creating a rift between the two resulting in the Cold War.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before Stalin’s rise to power, the USSR’s industrial system lagged decades behind other powerful nations. In the 1930s, Stalin transformed USSR to an industrial power with his five-year plans . He also demanded a “liquidation of the kulaks” and brought the traditional peasant life to a violent end . During WWII, Stalin well transformed Soviet’s Red Army with his policies , and the Soviet military helped defeat the Axis power in the end. When Soviet Union rose as the new superpower, Stalin furthered Communists’ interests and started the nuclear arms race with United States, which led to the Cold War. Nonetheless, I believe Stalin had less impact than Napoleon because his reforms benefited Soviet Union only, and the communist rule he imposed did not affected most European countries except those in Eastern Europe. Napoleon, on the contrary, instituted reforms in different countries and spread the revolutionary and Enlightenment ideas over the entire European…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To what extent did Stalin establish a personal dictatorship in the years 1929-1939? Between 1929 and 1939?…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After WW2 a power vacuum was left in a large part of central and Eastern Europe. Stalin took the advantage of this in order to strengthen the Soviet Union and spread communism. In the Yalta conference (Feb 1945), Stalin demanded parts of Poland to be given to USSR. Stalin made a communist government of Poland although there was already a Polish government in UK. This kind of behavior made the West (USA, UK etc) fear that USSR would gain permanent control over Poland. Stalin went even further, in the same year (1945 July~August) Potsdam conference, Stalin wanted parts of Turkey, demanded trusteeship of one of the former Italian colonies in Africa, disabled USA and allies access in areas of Europe occupied by the Red Army, moved the frontier of the USSR westwards and gave Poland lands that the allies didn't agree. Stalin's actions and his wants made the West think Stalin was trying to make a huge communist empire. This marked a cooling in relations between the two sides.…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The orthodox school of historians would argue that the cold war developed due to soviet expansionism and this was clear in Stalin’s foreign policy. This was evident in the events that took place after 1945. One of the events that would side with this view would be the defeat of Germany in 1945 which gave Stalin the opportunity to spread communism through the use of Red Army. Source 7 would support this as it states ‘much of central and eastern Europe was within the soviet sphere of influence’. This was true because the Red Army controlled large areas of Eastern Europe and were in control of spreading communism. The view that Soviet policy was expansionist and aggressive was supported by George Kennan in the ‘Long Telegram’. China turning communist in 1949 was seen as a huge step towards expansionism, however the evidence that would suggest this isn’t true was the Greek Civil War, and Stalin did have a chance to take over Greece but never did.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we were to look at Stalin’s accomplishment, we could see that there was a majority of positive achievements over negative ones. Of the many accomplishments, the most prominent one is Stalin’s famous five year plans. These five year plans helped strengthen industrial and agricultural aspects of Russia as explained in Document 9. These changes could also be seen visually in Documents 2 3 and6 which show the industrial and agricultural…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The nature of Stalin's economic policies and their impact on the people of Russia is a widely debated topic. It's also a difficult topic on which to focus an enquiry, complicated as it is by the reluctance of the Soviets to release all relevant documents, and the political views of those interpreting to documents, driven as many were by their own agendas. However, the documents that have been selected for this enquiry have been chosen for the light they shed on the problem and in the expectation that they will enable a conclusion, however provisional, to be drawn.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I agree to a little extent that Stalin’s foreign policy was a major contributing factor to the emergence of the Cold War in the period 1945-50. Source S tells me that Stalin’s policies with regards to the military were ‘reactive and restrained’ and that he was constantly seeking peaceful coexistence with capitalism. This is in similarity with Source U where we are told that he was not pursuing expansionism –rather to ‘avoid confrontation with the West’ and wanted to cooperate with them. Source T however completely disagrees with my judgement as it suggests that Stalin aimed to dominate Europe peacefully –he was determined and would even resort to diplomacy to achieve this goal. The overwhelming argument however is that Stalin was seeking security in the region and was seeking to protect his country from future invasion through his reactionary policies –such as creation of a buffer zone and keen intent to paralyze Germany, he was not seeking to expand territory.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays