What Does Civil Disobedience Mean
Civil Disobedience Civil disobedience is the act of disobeying the law but in a peaceful manner while accepting the consequences. Many people feel it is wrong and disruptive; however, it is what makes people free and true to themselves and what they believe in. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it is truly giving the people their freedom. It does not harm anyone, since it’s only done to prove one’s point or to let them stand up for what they believe is right. The normal population seems to dictate that civil disobedience is wrong because it violates laws which are made to protect the people. Morris Leibman, a Chicago lawyer, stated in his article that, “There can be no law to which obedience is optional.” He feels as though every law must be followed to the exact point with no exceptions, but he does not note that people have the right to speak about what they believe. It is only done when someone feels the need to stand up for something or act on how they feel about the law when it is unjust. He also states that, “Specific disobedience breeds disrespect and promotes general disobedience,” meaning “rebellion” always leads people to grow
…show more content…
He believes people do what is right, which is not always to follow the law. He says, “I ask for not at once no government, but at once a better government,” since he observes how the government treats people and feels they are useless. Thoreau writes, “But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?” He is saying that just because the majority is the strongest, does not mean they are always right. Conscience was given to the people for a reason- “that we should be men first, and subjects
He believes people do what is right, which is not always to follow the law. He says, “I ask for not at once no government, but at once a better government,” since he observes how the government treats people and feels they are useless. Thoreau writes, “But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?” He is saying that just because the majority is the strongest, does not mean they are always right. Conscience was given to the people for a reason- “that we should be men first, and subjects