12 Angry Men Mid Term PROC 5840 Directed by: Sidney Lumet Writing credits: Reginald Rose (story and screenplay) Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Cast 3 Major Case Issues 4 Juror #8 5 Juror #4 9 Juror #3 12 References 15 Cast 1957 Actor Juror # Character Description Order of ’not guilty’ vote Martin Balsam 1/The Foreman The jury foreman‚ somewhat preoccupied with his duties; proves to be accommodating to others. An assistant high school football coach
Premium Jury Verdict
and reasoning; overall‚ diversity has a positive effect on a group’s decision-making process. Three cognitive outcomes of diversity are an improved critical thinking and decision-making process; an expanded network of resources for the group; and‚ a stronger communication structure (Griffith & Dunham‚ 2015). Our text explains that group diversity improves task performance and goal orientation. Ethnic and nationality diversity is a positive cognitive outcome of diversity because these types of groups
Premium Gender Management Gender role
12 Angry Men This movie shows and displays many social psychological events. In the beginning we see the jury of twelve men which would normally lead to a groupthink phenomenon. Group think is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people that show a desire for harmony and conformity within the group. (Myers p. 291) Which would result in an incorrect decision making and wrong outcome‚ and the incorrect decision would be the life of the boy. In the movie we see eleven jurors
Free Social psychology Sociology Social influence
12 Angry Men 12 Angry men presented moral dilemma of twelve jurors. The moral dilemma is of justice and prejudice as we see throughout the movie. A moral person does the right thing for the group or society as a whole‚ not just what’s right for themselves or another person at any given time. Juror number 8 creates his own dilemma because he believes that the boy is not guilty. He seeks answers to the dilemma himself by bringing up the uncertainties of case presented in court. He does not turn to
Premium Ethics Morality
12 Angry Men Motivation Paper Written By: Olivia Bumgardner Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”‚ the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics‚ while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation‚ the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty
Premium Thought Mind Common law
:Belonging Needs :Safety and Protection Needs :Physical Needs for Survival Self Actualization Needs we need to refine talents we already developed to some degree ‚ Self Esteem Needs which involve valuing and respecting ourselves by others the process continues throughout life. Belonging Needs the third level in Maslow’s Hierarchy is belonging or social needs we won’t other’s company‚ acceptance‚ and affirmation. Safety Needs we also meet safety needs through communication as for everyone if I
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs
Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting film. As the evidence is brought up to question by the jurors themselves. The complexity of this case grew as the films went on. Then came the hard part‚ making the decision‚ guilty or not guilty. Especially when you have jurors that are over shadowed by prejudice that influence their decision. It is only when prejudice is set aside that the jurors’ are able to make a more logical decision on the case. As the movie continues‚ all twelve jurors slowly arrive
Premium Film Crime Violence
Karina Verano Pd. 2B 12 Angry Men 1. Which characters base their decisions on prejudice? Juror number 4 based his decision based on the fact that the boy on trial grew up in the slum. Juror number 4 said‚ “He was born in a slum. The slum is a breeding ground for criminals. I know it and so do you. It’s no secret that children from slum backgrounds are menaces to society.” While Juror number ten just doesn’t like the boy bases on his race. Throughout the entire movie‚ he referred to the boy
Premium Jury John Cavil Samuel Anders
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING 25-Mar-13 Ghufran Ul Haque 12 Angry Men Inductive and Deductive reasoning with short explanation * Inductive Reasoning: 1. The boy had a motive for the killing‚ you know‚ the beating ad all. So if he didn’t do it then who did? Who else had the motive? Explanation: This is inductive reasoning‚ in this phrase the 6th juror talk straight to the 8th juror who is in favor of the guilty boy. So
Premium Inductive reasoning Abductive reasoning Scientific method
Twelve Angry Men Leaders are defined by two separate characteristics; those who are appointed as the leader and those with no special title that emerge as influential. In the movie Twelve Angry Men‚ Henry Juror#8 portrays a character that gains respect by others for emerging as a leader. Along with holding leadership abilities‚ his actions also resulted in classic communication techniques. At the beginning of the movie‚ it may seem that Juror #8 is displaying deviant behavior. The scene opens
Premium Jury 12 Angry Men Not proven