LEGT2741 Assignment There are three main parties to this case; Flywell Ltd (F)‚ the parent company‚ Jetover Ltd (J)‚ the subsidiary‚ and the Australian Pilots Association (APA) which is representing the 200 pilots currently employed by J. F incorporated J as a wholly owned subsidiary of F and appointed four directors for J from the six directors of F. Two hundred of F’s pilots were made redundant and immediately rehired by J on lower wages and entitlement previously enjoyed at F. New pilots hired
Premium Subsidiary Corporation Legal entities
Corporate Law (4th ed‚ 2013) LEGT 2741 Anil Hargovan 1 What is a trust? • ..is an equitable obligation‚ binding a person (called trustee) to deal with property over which he/she has control (trust property) for the benefit of persons (called beneficiaries) of whom he/she may be one (but not sole)‚ and any one of whom may enforce the obligation. • Note: Trust is not itself a legal entity. See further: Australian Corporate Law (4th ed‚ 2013) at pp 63-72 LEGT 2741 Anil Hargovan 2 Features
Premium Corporation
Tutorial 2 Business Structures Question 1 Advise Violet and Sonny regarding their liability to Friendly Bank in relation to the Busy Bee Florist Shop. Your answer must make reference to relevant provisions of the Partnership Act and precedents. Introduction In order to advise Violet and Sonny regarding their liability to Friendly Bank in relation to the Busy Bee Florist Shop‚ firstly it is necessary to examine whether a partnership relationship exists between (a) Violet and Busy Bee Florist
Premium Debt Partnership Joint and several liability
Introduction There are two urgent issues for us to figure out when dealing with two questions: firstly‚ whether Ron’s exclusion clause on the receipt or the sign is effective based on the fact that Winston does not know that existence of exclusion clause. Secondly‚ whether Winston accepts Ron’s exclusion clause at the right time and whether it can exclude Ron for liability. (a) Whether Winston is bound by the words on the receipt or the sign? As we can see in the case introduction‚ Ron
Premium Contract Sale of Goods Act 1979 Contractual term
LEGT 1710 BUSINESS LAW – ASSIGNMENT 2 1 Introduction Vincent is demanding compensation from Claude for the damages incurred from the paints provided. Claude‚ however‚ refuses this claim by arguing that he is protected by an exclusion clause – the words on the receipt and sign. Given that negligence was apparent and that the exclusion clause did not fall foul of any statutory regulations; whether Vincent will be successful in his claim‚ ultimately lies in the question was Vincent bound by
Premium Contract Contractual term Sale of Goods Act 1979
A: What is the full case citation? The full case citation is Novakovic v Stekovic [2012] NSWCA 54 B: (1) what are the names of the parties? The names of the parties are the appellant and the respondents. (2) Who is the ‘appellant’? Who is the ‘respondent’? In this case‚ the appellant is Mileva Novakovic and the respondents are Michael Stekovic and Snezana Stekovic. (3) Please explain why the parties are not referred to as the ‘plaintiff’ and the ‘defendant’? Parties are called as the plaintiff
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
LEGT 2741 MAJOR ASSIGNMENT The chances of successfully enforcing the contractual agreement between Casino Ltd. and its employees depends upon the issues raised‚ the rules and subsequent applications that could be established by the trade union against Casino Ltd. ------------------------------------------------- Issues 1. Whether Casino Ltd. (the parent company) and Caterers Ltd. (its wholly-owned subsidiary company) are considered as separate legal entities. Additionally‚ whether the concept
Premium Corporation Contract Subsidiary
OPDRACHT 2.2.1: STAKEHOLDERSANALYSE EN KRACHTENVELD In voorgaande taken zagen we de onmiskenbare rol die verschillende partijen en actoren in het organisatievraagstuk spelen. In blok 1 heeft u al kennis gemaakt met de grondlegger van de stakeholdersbenadering Freeman (1983‚ 1984) en soorten stakeholders bij Clarke (1998) Lees nu het artikel van R.K. Mitchell Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts uit 1997 (reader 2). Dit
Premium
LEGT 1710 BUSINESS AND THE LAW ASSIGNMENT 2: Semester 2‚ 2013 Length: 2000 words Worth: 20 Marks Due date: Monday 23 September 2013‚ by 5pm (See Course Outline Part A at para 4.4 for Submission Procedure) Winston operates a business‚ painting murals and other art works in offices and other commercial buildings. Over the past two years he has bought paint twice a month from Ron‚ a local paint manufacturer. Recently‚ Winston bought 100 cans of paint from Ron‚ which Winston then put in his storeroom
Premium Two Minutes Hate Nineteen Eighty-Four Hatred
A s ae o . s h r d n. . SCHOOL OF BUSINESS LAW AND TAXATION GST Free Supplies diffe.irom npur Taxed Supprtes for cST pu.poses in rhar: LEGT 2751 BUSINESS TAXATION MIJI‚TIPI‚IE CHOICE TEST 52 2OO9 (a) Wilh an nput laxed suppy the enlerpnse makno the supoiv does nol charge GST on lh6 supply and does not gei an nput tax credit for GST paid on pu.chas€s lhat reate to the input iax€d supply With a GSTffee suppy lh€ ontsrprise making the suppy do€s nol charge Gst on rhe suppy and does
Premium Taxation in the United States Trigraph Supply and demand