case of Stella Liebeck versus McDonald’s‚ resulting from Ms. Liebeck’s efforts to collect for damages sustained when she spilled extremely hot coffee into her lap in 1992. The issues‚ applicable laws and the conclusion the jury reached will also be covered as well as the subsequent impacts on American tort law following this decision. The facts in the Liebeck case start with the incident description as recounted by Aric Press in the March 20‚ 1995 issue of Newsweek. Ms. Liebeck was a recently
Premium Tort Burn Damages
Liebeck v. McDonald’s‚ also known as the McDonald’s Coffee Case‚ is a 1994 product liability lawsuit. This lawsuit became one of the most famous in the US history because after the court’s awarded Stella Liebeck $2.9 million‚ after she was severely burned by the coffee she brought from McDonald‚ there were debates over tort reform in the US. Stella Liebeck‚ a 79-year-old woman was in the passenger seat of her grandson’s car‚ while she ordered a coffee from McDonald’s. Liebeck’s nephew parked
Premium Tort Burn Product liability
Introduction This assignment is regarding the Liebeck vs McDonalds case back in 1992. The issues involved are discussed thoroughly as well as the difference between consumer protection laws in Malaysia and also the United States where the case took place. This assignment will also discuss the implications of the case and also businesses/consumers responsibility when handling accident prone products. Question 1 Major issues 1. The 180 degrees coffee caused full thickness or third degree
Premium Product liability Consumer protection Tort
about the McDonalds’ scalding coffee case. No one is in favor of frivolous cases of outlandish results; however‚ it is important to understand some points that were not reported in most of the stories about the case. McDonalds coffee was not only hot‚ it was scalding -- capable of almost instantaneous destruction of skin‚ flesh and muscle. Here’s the whole story. Stella Liebeck of Albuquerque‚ New Mexico‚ was in the passenger seat of her grandson’s car when she was severely burned by McDonalds’ coffee
Premium Burn Temperature Fahrenheit
Business Law Case Study 4/16/10 Liebeck V McDonald’s Corporation The case of Liebeck V McDonald’s Corporation also known as “The McDonald’s coffee case” is a well known court case which caused a lot of controversy. In February of 1992‚ Stella Liebeck‚ a 79 year old woman from Albuquerque‚ New Mexico sued McDonald’s Corporation for suffering third-degree burns from their product. Mrs. Liebeck and her grandson visited a local McDonald’s drive-thru and ordered a cup of coffee. After pulling away
Premium Tort
The McDonald’s hot coffee case occurred on February 27‚ 1992. Stella Liebeck‚ 79 year old woman‚ took McDonalds to court for being burned by hot coffee she purchased. While the car was not moving‚ but said to have been stopped at the time‚ Stella had the McDonalds cup of coffee between her legs and as she tried to open the lid the cup tipped over and burned her. This incident caused third degree burns on 16 percent of her body; she was hospitalized for eight days‚ had extensive skin treatment‚ skin
Premium Fast food restaurant Burn Product liability
1. Describe the company and the product safety issue that led to the lawsuit The name of this case in this report is the Liebeck v. McDonald’s. Restaurants and the court in which the lawsuit was filed was The Second Judicial District Court in Bernalillo County‚ New Mexico. The lawsuit was filed with the original complaint was filed on March 21‚ 1993‚ and the plaintiff only sued P.T.S.‚ Inc.‚ a New Mexico corporation and the local franchise operator. “McDonald’s coffee spill" tort case became a
Premium Food safety Foodborne illness Coffee
The Liebeck v. McDonald’s case was a product liability lawsuit filed by Stella Liebeck‚ a 79 year old woman who was burned by a scalding hot coffee. One Sunday afternoon in 1994‚ Stella Liebeck ordered a cup of coffee at a McDonald’s drive through in Albuquerque‚ New Mexico. As she sat alongside her grandson in a 1989 Ford Probe‚ Liebeck noticed that there were no cup holders on the passenger side. Acting quickly‚ Liebeck decided to put the coffee cup between her knees. When she removed the coffee
Premium Nutrition Obesity Blood
------------------------------------------------- CASE ANALYSIS REX V MCDONALD AND MCDONALD St Qd [1904] 151 ------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTION In order for criminal liability to be placed‚ an accused must not only commit a specific act but also a breach of a duty concerned1. This concept was brought to the forefront in the case of R v McDonald and McDonald St R Qd [1904] 151. The Supreme Court of QLD2 was called to consider the case of Angus and Flora McDonald‚ appealing against joint charges of
Premium Criminal law Supreme Court of the United States Law
Political Socialization Paper Politics encompass so much of our day to day lives no matter where or how you live. Growing up in South Texas with a very republican family has definitely shaped and influenced my views somewhat when it comes to politics. Because of our democratic government system‚ it is important to become educated and participate in government through voting‚ petitioning‚ and much more which is something that has always been stressed to me growing up. Although I live in a primarily
Premium United States Gun politics in the United States Liberalism