Preview

John Locke Questions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
938 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Locke Questions
John Locke Questions

1. John Locke describes the “state of nature” as a sort of equality between men. No man has any rights over the other, and they can be free in doing what they want. All being able to use the same faculties. Locke also explains that although they are free it does not give them the right to hurt one another because the “natural law” still exists even through the “state of nature”. Locke defines the state of nature as political power. This “state of nature” is basically where humans can exist without a government or social contract. And that people would follow this “law of nature” and would protect it against anyone who did not follow it. “The execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man’s hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation.” Locke also mentions that eventually people would try to form a government to try to protect their rights further. The “state of nature” is more of a thought rather than something that actually happened in history.

2. John Locke explains that the reason why people leave this “state of nature” is because this “paradise” is uncertain and insecure. There is no guarantee that people will always go along with the “laws of nature” and everyone will think of others as equals. So it makes it harder for individuals to enjoy this “paradise” because they fear something might go wrong so they want to quit and become part of a political society where someone can tell them what to do with there freedom. This feeling is because of the “mutual preservation” of their lives, estates, liberties and a big part, property. Men want to join a government to protect their properties; it says that they would want a known law that is a standard for right and wrong. Also another issue with the “laws of nature” is the judging system it would cause a lot of anarchy within the people because if everything was so “equal” then wouldn’t you be equal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Q: The phrase “ a lawyer’s brief justifying a revolution” has been used to describe the ___…

    • 4220 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIST Assignment 1

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Life, liberty, and property” are the main ideas of Locke’s natural law theory. Locke claims that “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it that, being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm one another in his life, health, liberty, or possession…” (SB, 35). According to Locke, in the state of nature, there is a set of universal law which depends on human reason and human nature. Every human being is naturally equal and free under any circumstance. The law educates all human beings to live in one livable community where everyone should treat others equally and peacefully. In addition, no one should destroy or control other human lives such as having them as servants for one business. Every member in the community should join together into one group for their amicable life and in order to maintain a civil society.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first being the state of nature as defined by Thomas Hobbes is that of a pre-societal state. In general terms this means there would be no government or any form of laws, leading citizens towards a constant state of war. As a result of this, people would be motivated solely by self interest, and would not have any regards towards others needs. This relates to a lecture on Zombies and Sociology given by Dr. Peters. Dr. Peter’s pointed out the fact that society begins to fail as a whole when its institutions breakdown. Government, the economy, religion, education, media and family are all institutions of society. In a Hobbesian state of nature it is likely that very few of these intuitions would continue to stand, the first to go being government and economy. It is also worth noting that in a Hobbesian state of nature, individuals are motivated to act out of fear, which Professor Gillard mentioned in his lecture. This explains why people act only to meet their personal needs, they are so blinded by fear that they fail to rationalize the needs of others. Locke takes a different approach when it comes to defining the state of nature, which places more emphasis on…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believes that before we form civil society by consenting to establish government, we live in a State of Nature. He describes this pre-political state as,...a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending on the will of any other man. (Locke, 1980, p.81)The State of Nature is ruled essentially by human nature. Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property are the most prominent principles that Locke feels are innate to humans. Locke explains how nature intended for all men to be equal,...creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same facilities should be equal amongst another... (Locke, 1980, p.8)Locke comes to the conclusion that humans are self preserving in the State of…

    • 4014 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When it comes to State of Nature, Locke writes in his Two Treatises of Government,“...a state of perfect freedom of acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit within the bounds of the law of nature...The natural state is also one of equality in which all power and jurisdiction is reciprocal...” (Lonang Institute; State of Nature §4). Men are freely allowed to do whatever is necessary as long as there are justifications for their actions and to see that everyone around them is just as equal as themselves. Along with his State of Nature is Locke’s belief of Social Contact: “individuals in a state of nature would be bound morally, by the Law of Nature, not to harm each other in their lives or possession… individuals would agree to form a state that would provide a "neutral judge"...an impartial, objective agent of that self-defense, rather than each man acting as his own judge, jury, and executioner...”(Social Contract-Wikipedia). In other terms, man must form a government that they entrust their lives with by giving them support and power, and in return, the government must protect the people from hurting one another by being the objective factor in the justice system. Finally, in the State of Man, Locke claims that “at birth, the mind was a blank slate or “tabula rasa”... born without innate ideas, and that…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was an English philosopher and is believed to be one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. 17th-century Locke introduced the philosophy that humans agree to a social contract that allows the government to efficiently conduct society in harmony with natural law. He believes that without the control of the government, people would not behave in an acceptable manner and corrupt society. On contrary to the government, he felt the people should have the right to remove the government if they felt their natural rights were being threatened. Under natural law are natural rights. “Natural rights hold that because individuals are human beings capable of rational thinking and moral behavior, they are due all the rights one would have in the natural state.” Therefore Locke believed that all individuals are inherently good and created equally. This means individuals should innately be given natural rights which include: life, liberty, and property.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding principles on which the United States were established belong to the ongoing human quest for political and religious liberty. That quest has been the central theme of Western civilization. When the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth in 1620, they were seeking religious freedom. When the American Revolution was fought, it was fought for political freedom. The American Revolution is inconceivable in the absence of the context of ideas, which have constituted Christianity, such as Martin Luther's 95 theses, John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, as well as the social theory from the Puritan Revolution. The leaders of the Revolution in every colony were imbued with the precepts of the Reformed faith.…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Locke’s, “The Second Treatise of Government,” supreme power and authority is given to every individual person. John Locke's primary argument is that all people are born with equal rights, termed natural rights, that allow them to be treated the same and should be treated as such throughout their lives. He believed that all people have the natural right to govern themselves and their surroundings, free from outside duress. He stated that each of us has an equal right to the food, land, etc. that God has supplied us and we should all take it freely, but just what we must to satisfy our needs. He envisioned a world where, as humans who are rational creatures, we should govern ourselves. We have the natural right to life, personal property,…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next part of the passage questions why a man would ever want to leave the state of nature of freedom to be controlled by a higher power. Locke makes the argument that without a higher power or form of government man’s life and property could be in danger. A government could help secure freedoms and safety. In the state of nature many things are missing including a common law, no indifferent judge to determine differences, and a power to promote law. Men must create and agree with a form of law to make mankind peaceful with one another and punish those who fail to follow the law. Freedoms need to be protected by law.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to John Locke's State of Nature, he believed human being was born to have some certain right. One of them is a state of freedom; he said that all man were naturally in state of perfect freedom to order their action and disposed of their possessions and persons as they thought without any bounds of the law of nature or depending upon the will of any other man. It means that individuals have freedom on life and making decision. Equality is the second state which all man was equal with natural right that no king or other man had power to voice because each individual was born equally with " all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties." He also argued “Men living according to reason, without a common superior on earth, to judge between them, are property the state of nature."(Two Treaties 2.19). Although all man has freedom to do their wants, they cannot harm or use on other people because of their profits. It is called a state of liberty. Locke defended “the state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that, being all equal and independent, no…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke believed that an ideal state such as the state of nature could be governed by one simple law; the law of reason. Locke also wrote that in this state of nature, men are completely equal, “unless the lord and master of them all should… set one above another…” The idealistic state that Locke focuses on, is impossible to reach in his description of it. He says himself that this perfect and equal state is compromised by a “lord and master” who brings hierarchy to the people. This “lord and master” must be the only one with the ability to compromise man’s natural state, and therefore that individual has more power over others. So in reality, this “natural state” was never truly natural because one individual - a master - already had some power over others. Additionally, if this master is able to disrupt the natural state without having to justify his actions and without the consent of others, then this natural state- which can never truly exist in the beginning- is fragile enough that it can fall to pieces from one person’s actions, which means that the natural state may be just as if not more unstable than a government system in which there is an established…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes' and Locke's writings center on the definition of the "state of nature" and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and "the state of nature", a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes' Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler's powers. The understanding of the state of nature is essential to both theorists' discussions. For Hobbes, the state of nature is equivalent to a state of war. Locke's description of the state of nature is more complex: initially the state of nature is one of "peace, goodwill, mutual assistance and preservation". Transgressions against the law of nature, or reason which "teaches mankind that all being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty and possessions," are but few. The state of nature, according to Locke's Treatise, consists of the society of man, distinct from political society, live together without any superior authority to restrict and judge their actions. It is when man begins to acquire property that the state of nature becomes somewhat less peaceful. At an undetermined point in the history of man, a people, while still in the state of nature, allowed one person to become their leader and judge over controversies. This was first the patriarch of a…

    • 3013 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locke’s natural law says that individuals take care of others. Locke wanted to create a better government that would consider all people, not a government with kings and nobles. He believed that there should be no one to enforce laws and that neither good nor evil existed in nature. Locke also believed that the people of nature are created equal and have rights to all things. Because of this, a constant state of war exists. Locke wanted people to act more responsible and morally and face their consequences if there were any.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Review Guide

    • 5314 Words
    • 22 Pages

    * State of Nature – All men are originally in a state of nature. A man in this original state is bound by the laws of nature, but he is otherwise able to live, act, and dispose of his possessions as he sees fit. More important, human beings, free from the arbitrary laws of other men, have an obligation to protect the interests of each other, since they are all equally children of God. They also have an obligation to punish those who go against God’s will and attempt to harm another by compromising his life, liberty, or possessions.…

    • 5314 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays