Preview

Similarities Between Hitler And Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Hitler And Russia
IV. Differences

Although both Stalinist USSR and Hitler's Nazi Germany shared some similarities in terms of the means of their rule, these two totalitarian regimes differed from each other in economic and social aspects.

(1) Economic Institution

The USSR - Collectivization
The Five Year Plan started under Lenin and continued by Stalin which enabled the USSR to develop economically but at a great cost to the Soviet people. Indeed, Stalin strengthened the state's existing dominance: legal private entreprise above the level of highly-restricted individual production and commerce practically ceased. However, the Five Year Plans for industry were ambitious and far-reaching. They assumed nothing less than the transformation of the Soviet Union
…show more content…
Private enterprises were to be eliminated. Talking about collectivization, it was a policy to transform traditional agriculture in the Soviet Union and to reduce the economic power of the Kulaks. It had a serious impact on the USSR and created a man-made famine in Ukraine. As Richard Charques said in his book, "But among the ghastly fruits of the campaign for collectivization was the 'man-made famine' of 1931-32 in the Ukraine and the northern Caucasus, where it had been resisted most fiercely and where the fields had lain almost totally neglected. There were millions of deaths from starvation in these regions." Yet, despite all the problems, the plan was successful in many aspects. The USSR's economy improved dramatically in just 10 years. Housing, sanitation and shopping all struggled to keep up with the pace of …show more content…
This was called 'Autarky', meaning self-sufficient by suspending and terminating foreign help and supplies. Hermann Goering’s Four Year Plan was therefore proposed to get the army and industry ready for war in 4 years. However as a result of this, businesses within or out of the country were strictly controlled; although businessmen were encouraged to invest more, at the same time they were not allowed to raise wages to workers and workers could only be sent to other factories. Hence this may lower the workers' incentives to work. Thus, these policies had a lot advantages though, it had also caused massive economic problems and discontentment among Germans despite the aim of these policies were to tackle the devastated impacts by the Great Depression and restoring Germany from a high unemployment rate into full

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To a greater extent, I do agree that collectivisation was an essential contribution to stalin’s transformation of the economy, for example, it helped increase production and with it came the increase in industrialisation. Although there were many clear failures with collectivisation, in purely economic terms, it was mainly successful. However, I also think, that to a certain extent, it was other factors such as the 3 5 year plans that helped transform the economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are widely regarded as the greatest tyrants of the twentieth century, accountable for more violent deaths than any other leaders in history. Both have been individually and collectively labeled mass murders, tyrants, “authors of terror”, and even “twin demons of the twentieth century”. The shared political methodology of both dictators was heavily based around totalitarianism. Their apparatus of power and repression led to absolute and ruthless authority over the population of their respective nations. The disparity in Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin’s rise to power, economy, policies, totalitarian rule and methodology confirm who the greater oppressor was.…

    • 3537 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The degree of totalitarianism in a country is a very controversial topic between historians. Yet, in this essay it a personal opinion is given towards proving that Stalin was more totalitarian than Hitler. In order to start this persuasive essay, the time period of both regimes and context must be known. Firstly, Josef Stalin was a Georgian man, who ruled Russia Between 1929 and 1953 and made it a totalitarian state. He came to power after Lenin had died using many ways and opportunities such as the Lenin testament, disputes over NEP, and his cunning character and position. As compared to Adolf Hitler, who was also not born in the country he ruled (Germany) but was an Austrian. Hitler came to power due to reasons such as economic crisis, impressing the people by promising them things far different from pervious government, Versailles Treaty. Since the context of both regimes are now known, one must be first clear on the definition of a totalitarian before claiming which ruler was more totalitarian than the other. A totalitarian state is one that is centralized or in other words ruled by one party, it is also dictatorial and enforces complete subservience to the government. Therefore due to the evidence that is found, it is argued that: Stalin’s rule over Russia seemed more totalitarian than Hitler’s regime over Germany in regards to actions taken and goals set towards politics, society, and the economy.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were different in their ideology and how they came to power but were similar in some ways. They both used the same tactics to stop uprisings and to silence party rivals but the question that still remains is which regime was worse? With all the knowledge we have now of the atrocities that both regimes committed not only against their own people but to people outside of their countries I don’t believe one was worse than the other but that both were equally horrendous. They were both set on maintaining power at any costs even if it meant murdering innocent individuals, at least a few million individuals were killed under Stalin and under Hitler's regime 11 million non-combatants were killed. If Hitler hadn't…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Orlando Figes states in ‘The Whisperers’, “ Collectivization was the great turning point in Soviet history.” Stalin put in place collectivization in order to increase agricultural output and also more importantly the state would have control over the agriculture. As 80% of the Soviet Union population were peasants, they would be seen to be a force not to be reckoned with. However the will of the state will crush and bend the peasants. This succeeded in happening through the establishment of the “Kolkhozi” in 1929. This was a collective farms establishment to replace the individual farms owned by the peasants. Many peasants disagreed and refused to give up their land, when they did this they were branded ‘Kulaks’ and were then severely punished. For Stalin there were several successes to collectivization such as the USSR has an agrarian economy as most of its people lived in the countryside and worked the land, so collectivization gave state control to the main source of national wealth. Another is that agriculture would “pay tribute” to industry and cheap food could feed the cities and also be exported to finance the purchase of machinery from abroad.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin and Hitler emerged when political and economic instability had crippled the USSR and Germany in the 1920s. They began making improvements which encouraged their people to believe that prosperity awaited them. This notion was unfortunately a delusion as both figures would eventually rule by decree. Despite treading on different paths of dictatorship, both figures still find some commonalities.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin of Russia

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before Stalin came to power, Russia was at least fifty years behind in relation to industrialisation, compared to its rivals; the westernised capitalist countries. Stalin had planned to abolish this fifty year gap in just a short ten years. In order to achieve this, Russia had to be less dependent on its Agricultural lifestyle and more reliant on industrialisation. The production rate of Russia was low compared to other countries, and Stalin felt that in order to survive a potential attack against an anti-communist country, the USSR needed to invest in materials such as coal, iron, steel and power in order to defend itself. To achieve the vast production of the USSR, Stalin had created a set of plans called the ‘five year plans’. The first of these plans were aimed at expanding and modernising already existing factories, to establish new factories, and relocate those in the west closer to the east. The workers suffered in result to these plans, and were set unrealistic goals which they needed to achieve. They were given no leave and had to work for over 11 hours of intense labour at a time, though there is no doubt that…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s five-year plans and collectivisation policies were not the first attempt to reorganise the soviet workforce. The New Economic Policy was applied in March 1921, which was a mixture of socialism and capitalism. By 1927 the NEP had revived Soviet industry to 1913 levels and was successful in heavy goods, however agriculture was in turmoil. Stalin would no longer allow the peasants to threaten the cities – and the government – with their power to hold back food. He felt he could kill two birds with one stone: agriculture was to be updated on a collective and more politically acceptable basis bringing the still largely peasant population under party control.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Therefore, collectivisation had a negative impact on Russian rural life as the total output by the agronomists dropped until well after they had been sent to the collective farms. This can be seen by the statistics given by Nove as all types of livestock decreased because of how people where eating them to defy Collectivisation and get enough food to live on during the famine. Grain procurement continued to stay at around 60 million tons to help the growing industrialisation of places like Magnitogorsk. Taking this into account, collectivisation had a massive negative short term impact on rural life as Stalin only saw it as bringing the countryside to heel and making sure that ‘it was the countryside, not the towns, which went hungry if the harvest was bad’ as shown by source 7.It was more about collecting what they needed from the farmers rather than improving their standard of…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As many historians – such as Medvedev - point out, eventually the relatively successful NEP (which came into force after the Civil War) potentially could have yielded similar levels of industrialisation as Stalin gained from the Five Year Plans without the human suffering. However under Stalin the attitudes towards industrialisation radically changed to push for a far more rapid policy, the first 'faze' of which was Collectivisation.…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin's Five Year Plans

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stalin’s first of three five year plans was the collectivization of all private farms and lands. Those lands were then given to the government. It was the beginning of the Bolvestic kleptocracy in Russia. Anyone who expressively defied the collectivization was killed. In…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting perspectives

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Five Year Plans were a series of nationalized plans for the economic development of the Soviet Union…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second World War was one of the most devastating conflicts ever encountered, fuelled by two ruthless dictators that aimed to assert their own ideologies on the rest of the world. By comparing Nazism to Stalinism, highlights the similar authoritarian measures they embraced in order to obtain their political goals. Hitler and Stalin were seen as figureheads of their respective states. They had support among their people that enabled them to exert their influence in a corrupt manner and to form powerful militaries that could sustain their ambitious aims. However, it is this juxtaposition that limits our comparison for understanding these two forms of government. It brings notice to the notion that although these two governments possess similar characteristics in terms of oppressiveness to achieve their aims, they actually have different ideologies that are completely opposed one another on the political spectrum.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this extended essay I chose to research about the effects that Stalin’s policy of collectivisation had on the USSR, both short-term and long-term. I chose the topic of collectivisation because it is a very interesting subject, as it had major impacts on the USSR, both short-term like a dramatic famine which is said to have ended the lives of over 6 million Soviet farmers or long-term, like the modernisation of Russia’s industry which resulted, mainly, in it being properly prepared to resist the German invasion in 1941 I researched wether it had a positive or a negative impact on the country at a social and economic level. I took into consideration several facts, like the elimination of entire peasant villages during the transfer of peasants to the collective farms, the famine that was caused by the lack of food in the countryside and the slaughter of cattle, sabotages of crops and burning down of houses, ranches and other property, carried out by the very owners of these. I got to the conclusion that although at first agricultural production seemed to improve as a cause of collectivisation, its negative effects soon became clear when the peasant population became affected by the strong famine in rural areas. I encountered several problems while writting this extended essay, as it was very hard to get a reasonable amount of bibliography, I began my research with Hosking’s The First Socialist Society: A History of the Soviet Union From…

    • 4689 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays