Preview

Socrates And Phaedo: A Philosophical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates And Phaedo: A Philosophical Analysis
At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo, Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates, however, argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized, to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another, a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently, if the harmony of a lyre were to represent the human soul, then the harmony of all lyres must be the same, since no soul is greater nor lesser than another. Now, if virtue represents harmony and wickedness disharmony, then all souls must have the same amount of virtue

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead on the tracks there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are some distance off the tracks on a footbridge standing next to a very large or fat man; we will call him the portly fella. You can push the man off the bridge, and his body will fall onto the tracks and stop the trolley from killing the five people, but will kill the portly fella. You have two options: (1) Do nothing and let the trolley kill the five people. (2) Push the man onto the tracks, where it is likely to kill the one person. What would you do in this situation? Push the portly fella, or just watch as the five people on the tracks reach their own demise.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place at the marketplace. Euthyphro is on his way to charge his father for murder, and Socrates is going to his own trial, because he was accused of corrupting the minds of the youth. Before going into his trial, Socrates asks Euthyphro, who claims to be a spiritually enlightened prophet, what exactly makes something of piety or impiety. He asks this, because he wants to be seen as Euthyphro’s student, and so that he can use Euthyphro’s teachings in order to understand the difference between godliness and ungodliness, so that he can represent himself in court. As Euthyphro attempts to define it in clear and general terms, Socrates brings up different flaws and perspectives on his explanations that cause him to delve into it. As they continue to discuss it, Socrates’ questions cause Euthyphro to come full circle back to his first explanation of it, and they never come to a clear conclusion.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of Socrates’ criminality is not straightforward. The truth or falsity of the accusations is not certain. Also, the perspective from which the question is viewed changes its answer. The only certainty is that the philosopher, Socrates, was found guilty and sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for corrupting the youth and a disbelief in the Athenian’s Gods. If the Apology’s origins are to be believed, as in if Plato wrote a true description of events, then it can be said that Socrates does not believe himself to be guilty of these crimes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Gorgias1, Socrates says, “I think that I am the only or almost the only Athenian living who practices the true art of politics; I am the only politician of my time”, while in the Apology2, he claims that “he who will really fight for the right, if he would live even for a little while, must have a private station and not a public one.” As we know, Socrates did manage to live for over 70 years, and did indeed confine himself to a private stance; but how can one be a politician without being a public figure? Or was Socrates not a true champion of justice, as he maintained to be?…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Callicles claims that we only have to look at nature to find evidence that it is right for better people to have a greater share than worse people. How does Socrates respond to this argument? Who makes the stronger case? Why?…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    what it is to have knowledge. Is there a difference between knowing something and having a…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King talks a lot about justice in this letter to the clergymen. He believes that if everyone is given a chance, everything will be better. He believes in following just laws, just as Socrates believes in doing the right thing. In Plato’s, Crito, Socrates refuses exile from jail because it would have been wrong for him to leave. He believes in justice and escaping would have been an injustice. He does not want to leave because he respects the laws and does not want to disobey them. In addition, Socrates teaches about doing the right thing and how could he continue if he is not living by it when breaking the law. He would rather die an honorable person than live and be judged for the rest of his life(Plato, 1993). For Socrates, coherence was…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates The Myth Of Er

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Myth of Er concerns the issue of what happens to us after death. What Socrates is trying to sum up, which he has been mentioning through out the entire book, is that we should all live a wise, strenuous, and philosophical way of life. Socrates’ tale is for people from all walks of life, he only wants us to pursue a just way of life. The way it correlates to politics is that he wants people that hold a high status is politics to make sure they are just in the decisions they make for their people, because they will have to pay for it in the afterlife. The tale is obviously a lie and its only intention is to scare people. The number one way to motivate a large population to listen is through fear, and it’s pretty obvious that this myth is…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Socrates

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What are the needs of the political community? What must all political communities do to insure their survival? What about Philosophy? What does philosophy seek? How does it go about this process?…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates spent most of his life in Athens. During his life he witnessed the rise and glory of Athens and the rapid decline of Athens during the Peloponnesian war. Socrates met and talked with a variety of people such as politicians, statesmen, sophists, poets, architects, and ordinary citizens. He taught philosophy to the youth of Athens, devoted friends, and pupils like Crito. Plato was one of Socrates’ students, and he is considered to be most brilliant student of Socrates. In fact, Plato is the major source of knowledge about Socrates’ life. Socrates questioned and cross-examined Athenians about their moral, religious, and political beliefs. People found it difficult to understand him. His habits were strange, and his arguments were hard to understand. Socrates created a revolution in Greek philosophy. Plato portrayed this revolution in Defence of Socrates, Euthyphro, and Crito. Socratic Method is characterized by asking questions. When Socrates talks, he asks the questions all the time. He teaches and refutes with questions. He talks to people with questions. The central element that upset the Athenians was the destructive cross-examination of the principles and beliefs that Athenians lived by, which consequently led to Socrates’ death because his contemporaries did not want to admit their own ignorance.…

    • 2204 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death of Socrates

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Crito, you and other people who claimed to be friends to Socrates are all useless! How could you have been so cowardly, or lazy, or stingy, as to allow you 'friend' to die? Surely, with a little courage, energy, and money, you could have saved him."<br><br>Those are strong accusations coming from someone who obviously did not know Socrates as well as his other students or me. Although, I expected that people would react this way to my actions, or lack of actions, regarding Socrates death.<br><br>For Socrates, being executed was the only option available to him. Of course we, his friends, could have helped him to escape, but what would that prove? It would only go against everything that Socrates has taught us. It would also defy everything that Socrates stood for in life. Escaping punishment, would have been an unjust and cowardly act for him. Disobeying the law would set a bad example for his fellow citizens. In addition, it would ruin his reputation for being just and following the laws of the government. <br><br>Socrates believed that, although he was wrongfully accused, he was given a fair trial through the eyes of the law. The fact that he was given a fair trial means that he was given a fair punishment. If this punishment is not carried out, justice will not be served. Escaping punishment would cause a conflict between his teachings and his actions. This would eradicate the moral reputation that Socrates had built for himself throughout his life. The question he would have asked himself would have been, "What kind of example would I be setting if I dishonored my own teachings?" He saw his punishment as a contract between he and the government, and he firmly believed that agreements should not be broken. This is the same government that allowed him to live life as he chose, so why harm an institution that benefited him?<br><br>In addition, what kind of student would I be if I disregarded everything I learned from my teacher and helped him to escape? That…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays