Preview

Socrates The Myth Of Er

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
966 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates The Myth Of Er
The Myth of Er concerns the issue of what happens to us after death. What Socrates is trying to sum up, which he has been mentioning through out the entire book, is that we should all live a wise, strenuous, and philosophical way of life. Socrates’ tale is for people from all walks of life, he only wants us to pursue a just way of life. The way it correlates to politics is that he wants people that hold a high status is politics to make sure they are just in the decisions they make for their people, because they will have to pay for it in the afterlife. The tale is obviously a lie and its only intention is to scare people. The number one way to motivate a large population to listen is through fear, and it’s pretty obvious that this myth is …show more content…
If a person who holds a high political status and truly believes in this tale, he or she would want his people to follow the moral of the story and strive to become better people. Not only would they impose this among their peoples, they would follow it for themselves. From the point of view of a politician with great power, it is very easy to take advantage of your peoples and gain resources, wealth, and power for your own benefits. Now if a politician had a firm belief in this tale they wouldn’t want a guilty conscience, because he would have to pay ten fold for each sin that he commits. This way the society is based on trust. The citizens of that political system can trust in their political leader to make decisions that will benefit the society. This myth is also aimed at people that are peasants in this society. For instance, if a peasant decided to live a just life with out committing any crimes, maybe in the next life they will be able to choose a better life. The same goes for someone that holds a high position in society. For instance, one must ask themselves is a lifetime of wealth, prosperity, and power not enough? That is why maybe in the next life they might choose something that is a lot more humble. “For the most part the choice was made according to the habituation of their former life.” (Plato P. 302) What Socrates was really trying to say with this statement is in the next life we should be choosing the better life for ourselves, not the life that is easier or empty. The only way we can make an educated decision is through wisdom. Hence, that our souls are immortal and knowledge is only recollection. It’s a system of false hope and fear. Which leads me to my next point: the contradictions and lies behind the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates Myth Of The Metals Analysis
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates Myth Of The Metals Analysis

    significant attempt to apply the lie: he needs to “persuade… the rulers… and the soldiers, and then the rest of the city, that the entire upbringing and education we gave them, their whole experience of it happening to them, was after all merely a dream…” (414d). If the myth is to be successful, every citizen must believe the myth and deny his conscious knowledge of the past. The attempt to convince every citizen, particularly the rulers and the soldiers, is crucial in adherence to the myth; without belief in the myth, no individual can fulfill the myth’s purpose. Socrates elaborates on the myth, stating “that in reality they [all people]… [were] formed and raised deep within the earth…. When the process of making them was complete, the earth their mother released them” (414d-e). The citizens’ shared origin forms a common beginning. The unifying force will then prompt each man to regard his peer as…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro And Socrates: An Analysis
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthyphro And Socrates: An Analysis

    In the reading Euthyphro, it is an argument between Euthyphro (the priest) and Socrates (who is being indicted by another man). This reading is a dialogue between the two men arguing on the same topic, even though they each gave examples, they still can’t figure out the answer but going “around and around” with the original question. Since Euthyphro and Socrates gave a lot of examples during the argument, I was really confused when reading it. I couldn’t organize my thoughts on the reading. However with the example of Euthyphro persecuting his own father for “murdering” a drunk murder, I start to have an idea of what they are arguing about, in my opinion, it is a question with no right answer for. No matter which answer was given, the result…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Phaedo Vs Plato Apology
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plato's Phaedo Vs Plato Apology

    “It asserts that Socrates does injustice by corrupting the young and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia ”…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates And Phaedo: A Philosophical Analysis
    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates And Phaedo: A Philosophical Analysis

    At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo, Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates, however, argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized, to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another, a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently, if the harmony of a lyre were to represent the human soul, then the harmony of all lyres must be the same, since no soul is greater nor lesser than another. Now, if virtue represents harmony and wickedness disharmony, then all souls must have the same amount of virtue…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Truth Be Told: Socrates Examinations of Life
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Truth Be Told: Socrates Examinations of Life

    The second reason Socrates believed that his death would be more harmful on the citizens of Athens is that during his trial he referred to them as a big slow horse, and referred to himself as a fly; and this fly is constantly biting the horse to make him move faster. The point of this analogy was to show the people that without him they will suffer. Socrates is always trying to improve the people of Athens. Without him, there will be no one there to find out the truth, to teach the truth. With Socrates gone the…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Definition Of Piety In Plato's Apology
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Definition Of Piety In Plato's Apology

    First, Socrates is an outsider, so even though he preaches many philosophical ideas, he did not grow up with many of the teachings and stories that all Athenians grew up with, potentially causing a difference in their original values. Also, Socrates can be viewed as out of place in Athens because he is not like most other Athenian citizens –by constantly challenging others beliefs, he is attempting to bring the people of Athens out of place with him. Next, Athens is in a state of ruin, coming off a lost war with Sparta which caused the citizens to question many of their ideals and the stability of the state to become fragile. Socrates questioning the citizens on their ideals only adds to the fragility of the state, pushing it closer to a state of crisis. In the play Oresteia, Athena warns the Athenians to be weary of internal threats. During the Apology, Socrates is called and can be viewed as an internal threat, jeopardizing the safety of other Athenians and drawing on their fear to start an uprising against the government. Socrates also shows the virtue of arrogance in Plato’s piece, choosing his punishment to be free meals at the public’s expense which is more like a reward instead of choosing an actual punishment. By his arrogant actions, Socrates is actually harming wisdom because he refuses to listen to the views of other…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro And Socrates Analysis
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euthyphro And Socrates Analysis

    The conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place at the marketplace. Euthyphro is on his way to charge his father for murder, and Socrates is going to his own trial, because he was accused of corrupting the minds of the youth. Before going into his trial, Socrates asks Euthyphro, who claims to be a spiritually enlightened prophet, what exactly makes something of piety or impiety. He asks this, because he wants to be seen as Euthyphro’s student, and so that he can use Euthyphro’s teachings in order to understand the difference between godliness and ungodliness, so that he can represent himself in court. As Euthyphro attempts to define it in clear and general terms, Socrates brings up different flaws and perspectives on his explanations that cause him to delve into it. As they continue to discuss it, Socrates’ questions cause Euthyphro to come full circle back to his first explanation of it, and they never come to a clear conclusion.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparison Between Crito and Apology
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparison Between Crito and Apology

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Allegory Of The Cave Philosophy
    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Allegory Of The Cave Philosophy

    As Socrates is teaching this hypothetical figure to Plato and Glaucon, Socrates starts to talk about how there has been some cases with major powers have started the journey to enlightenment. Socrates tells his students that the major powers, when on the path to enlightenment, should never return to their past life due to the power being blinded like the one individual who was dragged out of the cave. now at this time Socrates is being put on trial for death row for influencing his students way of…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates

    The question of Socrates’ criminality is not straightforward. The truth or falsity of the accusations is not certain. Also, the perspective from which the question is viewed changes its answer. The only certainty is that the philosopher, Socrates, was found guilty and sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for corrupting the youth and a disbelief in the Athenian’s Gods. If the Apology’s origins are to be believed, as in if Plato wrote a true description of events, then it can be said that Socrates does not believe himself to be guilty of these crimes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory of the Cave
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Allegory of the Cave

    What Socrates is saying may relate or connect to our lives in the sense that politics for example does not give…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Myth of Er
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato's Myth of Er

    The purpose of the Myth of Er is to emphasize one of the points that Plato has been making throughout this whole book, that philosophy, or the quest for knowledge is essential in order to have a successful existence, either as a person or a group of people. One cannot work towards something until and unless he knows what that thing is and how to get there. It is only possible to study philosophy up to the point where one fully understands the Form of the Good, which is the ultimate form. Because of there being a limit to how much knowledge one can gain, it is not ridiculous to assume that one is able to reach that level of knowledge. Even though it’s almost impossible to perceive that there is an ultimate form of good, it is not unattainable because everything in existence is striving towards that. The catalyst that moves a soul to that goal is what philosophy is. Philosophy is the pathway to get to the ultimate kind of life: an untroubled and satisfying existence.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates
    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Thrasymachus
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato and Thrasymachus

    Plato has a different sense of justice than what we ourselves would consider to be justice. Justice starts in the heart and goes outward. Justice is about being a person of good intent towards all people, doing what is believed to be right or moral. Plato believes that once a person has a true understanding of justice that they will want to be “just” for its own benefit regardless of good or bad consequence. Though being just is known to have good consequences also makes being “just” a positive trait. (Clark, 2003, 13) Living a “just” life is good and good is the “well being of well living, the best life is supreme good.” (Bao, 2011, 259) The cause of our happiness is better than being happy itself, which is why this is powerful. We can look at supreme good as experiencing all good things without feelings of regret. (Bao, 2011, 259)…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Short essay discusses why Socrates did not fear death.
    • 602 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Short essay discusses why Socrates did not fear death.

    Socrates has valid reasons to not fear death. He says, "Whether life or death is better is known to God, and God only" (CPQ 28). Since God has not told Socrates which is better, he decides that what the Athenians believe will suffice. When Crito suggests that Socrates escape and avoid death, Socrates asks Crito if the Athenians hold to living well, honourably and justly. Crito replies that they do and Socrates explains it is not just for him to escape prison and he must carry out his just agreements so he does not hurt the Athenian people. He wants to set an example and he cares far more for living an honourable life as part of the community, than setting a bad example and doing the citizens an injustice by not abiding by their laws. Socrates' personal reasons for not fearing death are reasonable and moral. Only a person who abides to the laws of the community with such dedication could be so fearless in the face of death. Socrates does not even worry about the world losing a great mind when he is dead. He only has concerns for the overall well-being of Athens. Socrates is a very honourable man in sacrificing his life to better serve his city and it is enough to say that in being honourable and knowing that he is doing the right thing, he has no reason to fear death.…

    • 602 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More